Redbook - does it matter?

[Anonymous]

With economy all over the world is so laggard that to push any more drugs would require Redbook violations. So, my questions is - are there any Redbook violations? Or, simply people are acceptably afraid to blow the whistle for loss of everything? If image and brand-name is everything, is Lilly holding up to the average standards, or just because Pfizer, GSK or Merck does poor at ethics, we can allow "certain" lapses in our ethics and then blame on inividual ethics violations? What do the DM have to say..

 

[Anonymous]

With economy all over the world is so laggard that to push any more drugs would require Redbook violations. So, my questions is - are there any Redbook violations? Or, simply people are acceptably afraid to blow the whistle for loss of everything? If image and brand-name is everything, is Lilly holding up to the average standards, or just because Pfizer, GSK or Merck does poor at ethics, we can allow "certain" lapses in our ethics and then blame on inividual ethics violations? What do the DM have to say..

Firstly, who gives a shit about what DM's have to say about anything?

Secondly, Lilly has no standards or ethics.

Poke a fork in it.....Lilly is done.

 

[Anonymous]

Did it matter, does it now, John would answer if he only knew how.

 

[Anonymous]

With economy all over the world is so laggard that to push any more drugs would require Redbook violations. So, my questions is - are there any Redbook violations? Or, simply people are acceptably afraid to blow the whistle for loss of everything? If image and brand-name is everything, is Lilly holding up to the average standards, or just because Pfizer, GSK or Merck does poor at ethics, we can allow "certain" lapses in our ethics and then blame on inividual ethics violations? What do the DM have to say..

It only matters when HR & executive leadership wants it to. They ignore it if there is enough money involved. For the menial workers it always matters as Lilly is always looking for a reason to can more people, especially if it means getting rid of someone before pension eligibility (age).

 

[Anonymous]

It only matters when HR & executive leadership wants it to. They ignore it if there is enough money involved. For the menial workers it always matters as Lilly is always looking for a reason to can more people, especially if it means getting rid of someone before pension eligibility (age).

True. The CIA required by the DOJ did not require such draconian measures, which delve into every aspect of work and personal life. It's just part of the Lilly game. You are guilty and should feel guilty as long as you are employed by Lilly, and even thereafter for a very long time. Some say, it's like a pact with the devil, your very soul gets whooshed up by that sucking sound. Sure there will be money, there will be plenty of money -- Al Pacino.

 

[Anonymous]

"The REDBOOK makes for fine entertainment when acted out in interpretive dance by desperate, forclosed-up redeployees. They perform in the antechamber of my modest 35,000 sq.ft. living quarters in the indy skyline. It's a good thing....for ME!"$$$J¢£$$$

 

[Anonymous]

You mean the magazine?

 

[Anonymous]

You mean the magazine?

No. The Lilly REDBOOK is a protocol for acceptable business behavior and practices. Breaking REDBOOK rules usually means termination unless you are on the executive staff, then it means a bonus.