http://www.hreonline.com/pdfs/110902Chart_HRsElite.pdf
Look at the link.
Ranked Number one in salary.
Employee stockholders, retail and institutional stockholders are paying this man's salary.
We all wonder about this company's bloated expenses. This is an examply of why.
Look at the people that were brought on under his tenure and passed HR's "background checks."
RR is a perfect example.
The lawsuit at Bayer is easily accessible in any search engine that most 8 year olds know how to use:
The link is here:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/032111bayersuit.pdf
Here are some excerpts of that lawsuit that are public information:
"49. DEFENDANT ROBERT ROSEN (“Defendant Rosen”) is Vice President of
Global Oncology at Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
50. Upon information and belief, Defendant Rosen actively and knowingly took
actions that aided and/or abetted discriminatory actions against members of the Class on account
of their gender and family responsibilities."
"232. During an investigator meeting at a conference in Phoenix, Arizona in 2006, a
male executive made inappropriate and sexist comments to a group of employees and
consulting physicians. Specifically, Defendant Rosen announced the hiring of a male employee
for the head of the oncology medical science group. He stated, “I’m never hiring another
woman over 40 again. They’re all crazy!”
233. Hiding her offense to the remark, Ms. Reilly attempted to defuse the situation by
replying to Defendant Rosen, “Come on, Rob! That means that you’d never hire me!”
Defendant Rosen responded to Ms. Reilly’s statement by confirming that she was correct and
that he would never have hired her.
234. Immediately following this incident, Ms. Reilly reported Defendant Rosen’s
inappropriate and discriminatory comments to HR. She also expressed concerns that Defendant
Rosen had offended and alienated important consulting physicians."
"237. After Defendant Rosen confronted Ms. Reilly, he began subjecting Ms. Reilly to a
campaign of retaliation that continues to the present.
238. This retaliatory treatment has included subjecting her to unwarranted disciplinary
measures, increased scrutiny, denial of promotion, reduction of work responsibilities, and an
increasingly hostile work environment.
239. For example, a few months after Ms. Reilly’s complaint to HR regarding
Defendant Rosen’s statements, Defendant Rosen called a one-on-one meeting with her in her
office. During that meeting, Defendant Rosen berated her for approximately thirty minutes.
During his rant, he stated that she “sucked” and that she was “terrible.” He further stated, “You
haven’t done a damn thing” and “I don’t know why we’re paying you.”
240. Defendant Rosen’s comments regarding Ms. Reilly’s work product and work
ethic were baseless. Since joining the Company in July 2005, she had made outstanding
progress in marketing her brand. She prepared for two launch meetings and moved forward as
soon as approval from the Food and Drug Administration was granted. During the first year,
she did not taken a single vacation day and worked several nights and weekends.
241. However, Defendant Rosen recruited other managers and employees for
assistance in building a case against Ms. Reilly and creating an uncomfortable work
environment for her in an effort to push her out of the Company."
Look at the link.
Ranked Number one in salary.
Employee stockholders, retail and institutional stockholders are paying this man's salary.
We all wonder about this company's bloated expenses. This is an examply of why.
Look at the people that were brought on under his tenure and passed HR's "background checks."
RR is a perfect example.
The lawsuit at Bayer is easily accessible in any search engine that most 8 year olds know how to use:
The link is here:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/032111bayersuit.pdf
Here are some excerpts of that lawsuit that are public information:
"49. DEFENDANT ROBERT ROSEN (“Defendant Rosen”) is Vice President of
Global Oncology at Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
50. Upon information and belief, Defendant Rosen actively and knowingly took
actions that aided and/or abetted discriminatory actions against members of the Class on account
of their gender and family responsibilities."
"232. During an investigator meeting at a conference in Phoenix, Arizona in 2006, a
male executive made inappropriate and sexist comments to a group of employees and
consulting physicians. Specifically, Defendant Rosen announced the hiring of a male employee
for the head of the oncology medical science group. He stated, “I’m never hiring another
woman over 40 again. They’re all crazy!”
233. Hiding her offense to the remark, Ms. Reilly attempted to defuse the situation by
replying to Defendant Rosen, “Come on, Rob! That means that you’d never hire me!”
Defendant Rosen responded to Ms. Reilly’s statement by confirming that she was correct and
that he would never have hired her.
234. Immediately following this incident, Ms. Reilly reported Defendant Rosen’s
inappropriate and discriminatory comments to HR. She also expressed concerns that Defendant
Rosen had offended and alienated important consulting physicians."
"237. After Defendant Rosen confronted Ms. Reilly, he began subjecting Ms. Reilly to a
campaign of retaliation that continues to the present.
238. This retaliatory treatment has included subjecting her to unwarranted disciplinary
measures, increased scrutiny, denial of promotion, reduction of work responsibilities, and an
increasingly hostile work environment.
239. For example, a few months after Ms. Reilly’s complaint to HR regarding
Defendant Rosen’s statements, Defendant Rosen called a one-on-one meeting with her in her
office. During that meeting, Defendant Rosen berated her for approximately thirty minutes.
During his rant, he stated that she “sucked” and that she was “terrible.” He further stated, “You
haven’t done a damn thing” and “I don’t know why we’re paying you.”
240. Defendant Rosen’s comments regarding Ms. Reilly’s work product and work
ethic were baseless. Since joining the Company in July 2005, she had made outstanding
progress in marketing her brand. She prepared for two launch meetings and moved forward as
soon as approval from the Food and Drug Administration was granted. During the first year,
she did not taken a single vacation day and worked several nights and weekends.
241. However, Defendant Rosen recruited other managers and employees for
assistance in building a case against Ms. Reilly and creating an uncomfortable work
environment for her in an effort to push her out of the Company."