QTR3 was worst than announced

Quote

Anonymous

Guest
Valeant organic growth is most worst than announced. B+L +10% vs. PY? This is not true! Real figures are worst than that, 2013 are inflated with ISTA that was not in 2012. Game is getting into its end. Run fast,...this was a dream
 
























B+L grew 10%!!! Heard most regions were flat at best, many markets were in serious decline after all the folks who knew how to run the business were let go or were told they are about to go...
How does he get away with telling the analysts this rubbish?
 






Don't know what you all are talking about - VRX is up 3% right now. Wall Street doesn't care about one time charges. They look for income from operations and income excluding one time charges such as acquisition impact and lawsuit settlements. So all is good in Valeant land. For now....
 
























Anonymous said:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/zacks/2013/10/15/solid-growth-strategy-pays-off-for-valeant/
Click to expand...

Quote:

"I have owned VRX since July for my Follow The Money (FTM) portfolio, where I track institutional buying in stocks with a strong Zacks Rank. I actually traded this name a few times in 2012 between $45 and $55, but when the stock popped from $75 to $95 on the B&L buyout in May, I took quick notice of how institutions really wanted to own VRX and how analysts were ramping up earnings estimates. Neither of those trends has changed."

He also mentioned Goldman Sachs' buy rating as if they were objective. I put this artical in the paid promotion or pump and dump category.
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote