• Thurs news: Lilly’s weight-loss drug prevents diabetes. Merck pays $588M for bispecific. Amgen speaks out about bone density issues with obesity drug. PTC gets gene therapy approval. JNJ’s 340B legal fight. See more on our front page

Proper Theology

Breakingnews

Breakingnews

Well-Known Member
What is 'Proper Theology'?

The dictionary defines 'proper' as: Of the required type, exactly correct, correct according to social or moral rules.

Theology is defined as: A system or school of opinions concerning God and religious questions.

On another thread the term 'Proper Theology' was used by MFAS to describe Orthodox Christianity.

http://www.cafepharma.com/boards/sho...d.php?t=547637

(Post #27 thru #31)

Combining the definitions, Orthodox Christianity, according to MFAS, can be defined as the required or correct theology.

The trouble with MFAS 'definition' is that is leaves out all other religions, including Judaism. To define Orthodox Christianity is quite a weighty opinion and, if indeed it is an opinion, that is acceptable even though people of other faiths will disagree. Where does MFAS definition leave all other form of religion? Are they considered 'Not Proper Theology'?

The issue here is that MFAS has put forth his opinion of Orthodox Christianity being Proper Theology as fact. When asked to provide proof to back up his assertion, MFAS dropped two fictional works as his 'sources' and most anyone knows that fiction does not back up fact.

With his definition of 'Proper Theology', MFAS actually disrespects all other forms of religion in stating that Orthodox Christianity is the only correct belief system. If indeed his definition of Proper Theology is his opinion, then that is acceptable as MFAS can think Orthodox Christianity is Proper Theology for him. If he continues to state that his opinion, in this case, is fact - He is wrong.

It's really quite simple, MFAS needs to provide valid proof for his claim or admit that it was only his opinion, which is acceptable.

Anyone, including MFAS, on this issue, is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. ALL religions are considered 'Proper Theology' in the eyes of their believers.

What is it going to be MFAS? Please try to answer this thread with the same respect and consideration that you have been given here, not with stock responses that include diversions, attacks and continued attempts to portray your opinion as fact.

The board awaits your response . . .
 




You undermined any credibility you may have had and exposed yourself as an unserious person, despite your attempt at a high tone by referring
to my proof sources as "fictional works" when they were absolutely nothing of the sort.

I stand by my statement and provided more than ample proof.
Seeing as how this thread has already been pulled once already, this will be the extent of my reply but this is more than sufficient to prove my point.

When will you learn not to try me? You always lose.
 




Man For All Seasons said:
You undermined any credibility you may have had and exposed yourself as an unserious person, despite your attempt at a high tone by referring
to my proof sources as "fictional works" when they were absolutely nothing of the sort.

I stand by my statement and provided more than ample proof.
Seeing as how this thread has already been pulled once already, this will be the extent of my reply but this is more than sufficient to prove my point.

When will you learn not to try me? You always lose.
Click to expand...

You underline your own credibility with trying to pass off opinion based works as proof for your opinion.

Let's take a look at your 'proof sources' :

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." It does nothing to back up your claim of 'Proper Theology'.

The Case For Christianity by C.S. Lewis is a transcript from the BBC broadcasts of C.S. Lewis' program during WWII. This book explains the reasons that God must exist, and then moved on to easily describe the major beliefs of Christians, and does not prove that Christianity is 'Proper Theology'

Both works are the opinions of the authors and are by no means supported by facts. I have no problem with their opinions, but they are far from factual.

You have not provided any credible proof beyond the above works and saying that this is the 'extent of your reply' is a sure sign that, in this case, you are wrong.

Another question that need to be answered is - In stating that Orthodox Christianity is Proper Theology, do you feel that other forms of religious faith such as Judaism are inferior to Christianity?

I am trying to have a respectful conversation with you on this issue and your continuous deflections do nothing to help the readers understand how you came to your 'Proper Theology' opinion.

If your above response is the extent of you reply on this thread, it is a sure sign that you can't admit that your statement on 'Proper Theology' is only your opinion and by no means a proven fact.
 




AnswerMan4Ever! said:
OK, so BN and vag can run around using a label on me and MFAS, but when I point that they are that very same label, my post gets deleted? Twice now in 2 days? Really?
Click to expand...

That is something you need to take up with the mods as far as the deletions are concerned.

As usual, you show up and throw up more wrong answers and contribute nothing of substance to a respectful conversation on this thread.
 
















AnswerMan4Ever! said:
You're obviously the boss of CP and make the rules.
Click to expand...

Not by any means -Do you ever get tired of providing wrong answers?

So far, your posts on this thread have done nothing to advance the discussion, only serve to divert and attack which is typical of your participation here on CP. I can understand your frustration as your buddy is drowning in his lack of credible proof for yet another one of his wild claims.

Care to comment on the OP or will you continue to exhibit troll like behavior?
 
















AnswerMan4Ever! said:
You're a good boy Anthony.
Click to expand...

Translation: AM4E has nothing of substance to offer in what is an attempt to have a respectful discussion on this thread. Instead, he chooses his usual diversion/dodging tactics and comes up lame in a vain attempt to help the floundering MFAS.
 




Well look what happened before I even got out of bed this morning. Moment of clarity: MFAS uses orthodox synonymously with proper.

Orthodoxy (from Greek orthos means "right", "true", "straight") + doxa ("opinion" or "belief", related to dokein, "to think").

Now I'm beginning to understand that old saying, "Don't bend over in front of a Greek!"
 




Breakingnews said:
You underline your own credibility with trying to pass off opinion based works as proof for your opinion.

Let's take a look at your 'proof sources' :

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." It does nothing to back up your claim of 'Proper Theology'.

The Case For Christianity by C.S. Lewis is a transcript from the BBC broadcasts of C.S. Lewis' program during WWII. This book explains the reasons that God must exist, and then moved on to easily describe the major beliefs of Christians, and does not prove that Christianity is 'Proper Theology'

Both works are the opinions of the authors and are by no means supported by facts. I have no problem with their opinions, but they are far from factual.

You have not provided any credible proof beyond the above works and saying that this is the 'extent of your reply' is a sure sign that, in this case, you are wrong.

Another question that need to be answered is - In stating that Orthodox Christianity is Proper Theology, do you feel that other forms of religious faith such as Judaism are inferior to Christianity?

I am trying to have a respectful conversation with you on this issue and your continuous deflections do nothing to help the readers understand how you came to your 'Proper Theology' opinion.

If your above response is the extent of you reply on this thread, it is a sure sign that you can't admit that your statement on 'Proper Theology' is only your opinion and by no means a proven fact.
Click to expand...

You undermined any credibility you may have had and exposed yourself as an unserious person, despite your attempt at a high tone by referring
to my proof sources as "fictional works" when they were absolutely nothing of the sort.

I stand by my statement and provided more than ample proof.
Seeing as how this thread has already been pulled once already, this will be the extent of my reply but this is more than sufficient to prove my point.

When will you learn not to try me? You always lose.
 








Man For All Seasons said:
You undermined any credibility you may have had and exposed yourself as an unserious person, despite your attempt at a high tone by referring
to my proof sources as "fictional works" when they were absolutely nothing of the sort.

I stand by my statement and provided more than ample proof.
Seeing as how this thread has already been pulled once already, this will be the extent of my reply but this is more than sufficient to prove my point.

When will you learn not to try me? You always lose.
Click to expand...

Your proof sources in no way back up your statement that Orthodox Christianity is Proper Theology. It is fine if that is your opinion, but to portray it a fact is misleading and false. In making such a claim, you discount all other religions that have followers who are also of the opinion that their faith is Proper Theology for them.

You accuse me of taking a high tone, when in fact, this thread is calling you out for taking a high tone in falsely stating that Orthodox Christianity being Proper Theology is a fact - It shows a blatant disregard for others spiritual beliefs.

To cut and paste your pervious response shows a serve lack of credibility on your part and further exposes your sources as not being able to back up your opinion.

I have been respectful in debating this topic with you and your concession is graciously accepted.
 




Breakingnews said:
Your proof sources in no way back up your statement that Orthodox Christianity is Proper Theology. It is fine if that is your opinion, but to portray it a fact is misleading and false. In making such a claim, you discount all other religions that have followers who are also of the opinion that their faith is Proper Theology for them.

You accuse me of taking a high tone, when in fact, this thread is calling you out for taking a high tone in falsely stating that Orthodox Christianity being Proper Theology is a fact - It shows a blatant disregard for others spiritual beliefs.

To cut and paste your pervious response shows a serve lack of credibility on your part and further exposes your sources as not being able to back up your opinion.

I have been respectful in debating this topic with you and your concession is graciously accepted.
Click to expand...

I win. You lose! That is my concession!
 








He won't do it, he sees the hole in his line of thinking and can't cope with it. As Fuckie say, it's a shame because it would be an interesting debate but then again, as DD says, we may just all have to ignore him because attempting a discussion with him on the topic is like going 100 mph in neutral.

Who is this freak anyway? He's incapable of commenting on the sports thread, never makes a word association, is a stick in the mud when it comes to talking about the birds and the bees, never comments on the stock market, a total stiff on getting a buzz, never starts a thread of his own - I mean who the fuck is he?

It's like the Christian Taliban Light - right here on CP.
 








You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back