This is one individual exercising her constitutional right.
It’s not even a big deal.
Go bundle for Trump if you don’t like it.[/
Sure, ok. Her constitutional right to be an unregistered lobbyist for Dems. She can support whoever she wants, fundraising for them is a different story.
This is one individual exercising her constitutional right.
It’s not even a big deal.
Go bundle for Trump if you don’t like it.[/QUOT
It is her right, as long as she doesn’t coerce Pfizer employees to vote Democratic or to use her position within the company to push corporate decisions that harm Pfizer. Also, she has no right to Incorporate her political viewpoints into Pfizer internal communications.
Time to get out of the PAC
Because our ELT are corrupt commies. That's why. It's that simple. If you can just accept it, then everything makes sense once you learn about the leftist's brain and their agendas.
You'd think the 20th century and the world wide leftists' evils would be a sufficient education for all, but obviously it's not.
You just aren't credible. You claim a missile hit the pentagon. You claim OKC was black flag operation. You claim Parkland didn't happen and was staged by "actors".
Go back to InfoWars you clown.
Credible? You make up pure bullshit about me and call me a clown?
Your post is right out of the leftist handbook utilizing the tactic of deflection from the truth and calling your enemies (people who resist leftists) liars and names. You are a useful idiot. That's what the Soviets called the leftists in the west who supported them.
As I said, learn about these evil leftists or you'll repeat history.
Go rescue some kids from a pizza parlor dungeon or better yet solve Bengahzi
Butter Emails!!!
Lock her up!
I think the OP point was that Ms. Susman seems to have a conflict, has a history of such conflicts as well as high profile failures at PFE. Not sure how this evolved into left-right argument, they both have their nuts.
her constitutional right to to be a democrat bundler, fundraiser for the democratic party? Her conflict is that she endorses and fundraises for candidates that advocate policies that will hurt the Pharma industry, they very people who fund her lifestyle. then she turns around and is involved in the PFE PAC...we are to believe that she will be objective in who gets PFE PAC money?How does Sally have a conflict? A private citizen exercising her Constitutional rights.
Look at Gillebrand - the hypocrite democrat accepting those contributions. She’s going to lose fast to more pure dem candidates anyway.
and I agree on Gillebrand, she has zero shot of getting the nomination...How does Sally have a conflict? A private citizen exercising her Constitutional rights.
Look at Gillebrand - the hypocrite democrat accepting those contributions. She’s going to lose fast to more pure dem candidates anyway.
her constitutional right to to be a democrat bundler, fundraiser for the democratic party? Her conflict is that she endorses and fundraises for candidates that advocate policies that will hurt the Pharma industry, they very people who fund her lifestyle. then she turns around and is involved in the PFE PAC...we are to believe that she will be objective in who gets PFE PAC money?
