Oral Covid Pill Protease Inhibitor Pricey Ivermectin

[anonymous]

!!!

 

[anonymous]

Your an idiot who obviously knows nothing about either drug

 

[anonymous]

CP refused to post my rebuttal. Question: If the jabs are so effective and necessary, why is Pfizer developing PF-07321332/ritonavir, an oral protease inhibitor?

 

[anonymous]

Same reason there’s tamiflu?

 

[anonymous]

Your an idiot who obviously knows nothing about either drug

I agree. Boston once again saves the company. Beyond boston, can we please close all the other research sites. They are just welfare sites that lack the intelligence to get anything done. Why do you think we got a 99 year lease with really no cuts. You keep the best players well paid and happy.

 

[anonymous]

CP refused to post my rebuttal. Question: If the jabs are so effective and necessary, why is Pfizer developing PF-07321332/ritonavir, an oral protease inhibitor?

To make more money. Who cares as long as I make my money. If R&D wants to take a turd, cover it with powered sugar and call it a doughnut, I would sell it. It's called business. If you are looking for some BS right and wrong or justice you came to the wrong place.

Now grow up.

 

[anonymous]

I agree. Boston once again saves the company. Beyond boston, can we please close all the other research sites. They are just welfare sites that lack the intelligence to get anything done. Why do you think we got a 99 year lease with really no cuts. You keep the best players well paid and happy.

Wonderful, great for you, dont care. Just keep pushing out more product. We should get in that whole pain business since that place in NJ went bankrupt. I would sell it. It's a wonder drug. Good for everything.

 

[anonymous]

CP refused to post my rebuttal. Question: If the jabs are so effective and necessary, why is Pfizer developing PF-07321332/ritonavir, an oral protease inhibitor?

couple reasons...one is globally many not vaccinated. second is with variants, vax will need to be modified on a yearly basis most likely, some vaxed will still get new variant Covid

 

[anonymous]

As someone who worked on the clinical development of ivermectin in the 80's; I say Merck had a duty to do a significant clinical trial on the efficacy of ivermectin on early infection of patients with COVID-19. There are published studies on the mode of action of ivermectin against COVID-19. There are enough small trials done around the world to warrant looking at it. Too many Yes men saying there is nothing here. Meanwhile a province of India tamped down COVID-19 with ivermectin. I wonder about criminal willful negligence of Merck in a pandemic.

 

[anonymous]

posted about how much this site censors posts and that got censored too! this site has sold out, I am done.

 

[anonymous]

CP refused to post my rebuttal. Question: If the jabs are so effective and necessary, why is Pfizer developing PF-07321332/ritonavir, an oral protease inhibitor?

Because the US govt has authorized payment for up to $700 per patient, that's why. You work in pharma and really don't know this? It's not about efficacy or patients anymore.

 

[anonymous]

Because the US govt has authorized payment for up to $700 per patient, that's why. You work in pharma and really don't know this? It's not about efficacy or patients anymore.

Never was