One million dollars to embarass Perry







Larry Flynnt can keep his money. The embarassment is letting Perry debate. He proves it every time he opens his stupid mouth, now I hope he is the nominee, because Obama will embarass so much, he will have to slink off of the stage.
Perry make Bawwkmann sound almost sane

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/...ds-1-million-dollar-quest-to-embarrass-perry/

The purpose of the debates is to expose weaknesses and accentuate strengths. Unfortunately this GOP group is really big on weaknesses. They may think that appealing to the extreme right will get them the nomination, and it may, but it will lose the center and the election.

Maybe Rick Perry should just quit the debates and claim that they are no longer debates since everyone is just 'piling on' him.
 






Why am I not surprised Rock would support this kind of action? If someone targeted her messiah this way, though, it would be racist! Of course we are supposed to think obama has never even had a girlfriend because his past is a closed book, silenced completely. Unless you are in witness protection, there is more history on you than his.

Perry is a strong candidate because he claimed to represent the views of the tea party. Unfortunately, his record is telling a different story. He's still the front runner though, so would be a fool to quit. He's gone through tough elections before. He needs to stay in the race. There are options in the GOP and the party will need to decide who they feel will best represent the needs of the country - needs which include getting obama out of office.
 
Last edited by a moderator:






Why am I not surprised Rock would support this kind of action? If someone targeted her messiah this way, though, it would be racist! Of course we are supposed to think obama has never even had a girlfriend because his past is a closed book, silenced completely. Unless you are in witness protection, there is more history on you than his.

Perry is a strong candidate because he claimed to represent the views of the tea party. Unfortunately, his record is telling a different story. He's still the front runner though, so would be a fool to quit. He's gone through tough elections before. He needs to stay in the race. There are options in the GOP and the party will need to decide who they feel will best represent the needs of the country - needs which include getting obama out of office.

Good post, I just need to make one correction.

You're post should have stated, "Of course we are supposed to think Obama has never even had a BOYFRIEND....."

Now why would I say such a thing? Because if we apply the liberal standard for what constitutes a "legitimate" story such as all the ginned up Sarah Palin "sex scandals", there is at least as much if not more evidence that Obama has had BOYFRIENDS in the past, but of course liberals and their allies in the media would never trade in such "unfounded" rumors, UNLESS it involves a Republican and especially conservatives.

Obama's "man dates" started long before he became president!:D
 






Why am I not surprised Rock would support this kind of action? If someone targeted her messiah this way, though, it would be racist! Of course we are supposed to think obama has never even had a girlfriend because his past is a closed book, silenced completely. Unless you are in witness protection, there is more history on you than his.

Perry is a strong candidate because he claimed to represent the views of the tea party. Unfortunately, his record is telling a different story. He's still the front runner though, so would be a fool to quit. He's gone through tough elections before. He needs to stay in the race. There are options in the GOP and the party will need to decide who they feel will best represent the needs of the country - needs which include getting obama out of office.

Dude or Dudette, whatever you are, you and the rest of the conservaturds constantly attack Obama, with mocking his name, his appearance, his color, and then you and the rest of the 'tards express outrage and confusion when you become the target for your own stupidity, so I'll make you a deal, quit trying to ridicule the president, and I will quit ridiculing teabagger 'tards. I am not worried, because 'tards just can't suppress their ignorance and hatred.
 






Good post, I just need to make one correction.

You're post should have stated, "Of course we are supposed to think Obama has never even had a BOYFRIEND....."

Now why would I say such a thing? Because if we apply the liberal standard for what constitutes a "legitimate" story such as all the ginned up Sarah Palin "sex scandals", there is at least as much if not more evidence that Obama has had BOYFRIENDS in the past, but of course liberals and their allies in the media would never trade in such "unfounded" rumors, UNLESS it involves a Republican and especially conservatives.

Obama's "man dates" started long before he became president!:D

So what? We have 2 female candidates for President. Using actual and real statistics: 50% of all women are bi-curious, therefore one of the 2 has had a girl/girl experience. That would be beautiful on film. :cool:
 






Dude or Dudette, whatever you are, you and the rest of the conservaturds constantly attack Obama, with mocking his name, his appearance, his color, and then you and the rest of the 'tards express outrage and confusion when you become the target for your own stupidity, so I'll make you a deal, quit trying to ridicule the president, and I will quit ridiculing teabagger 'tards. I am not worried, because 'tards just can't suppress their ignorance and hatred.

It is rather amusing how the cons think that this board is their personal bitch and moan forum. They expose themselves as the ultimate hypocrites when they complain that the 'libs' mock their so called 'leaders'. The cons here on CP can't have it both ways, but they sure try hard as hell to do so.
 






Dude or Dudette, whatever you are, you and the rest of the conservaturds constantly attack Obama, with mocking his name, his appearance, his color, and then you and the rest of the 'tards express outrage and confusion when you become the target for your own stupidity, so I'll make you a deal, quit trying to ridicule the president, and I will quit ridiculing teabagger 'tards. I am not worried, because 'tards just can't suppress their ignorance and hatred.

It is rather amusing how the cons think that this board is their personal bitch and moan forum. They expose themselves as the ultimate hypocrites when they complain that the 'libs' mock their so called 'leaders'. The cons here on CP can't have it both ways, but they sure try hard as hell to do so.

First of all, I'm over 12 so I'm not a dude or dudette and don't use those asinine terms. I'm a lady.

I don't care that you think Bachmann is stupid or that Perry can't debate. My post was in response to Rock's support of Flynt's actions. Can you imagine if someone put up a bounty to dig up dirt on your fearless leader? You would be crying for them to take the white hoods to court. Yet Flynnt, a scourge on humanity, and you support.

I suppose I should consider the source, Rock and Flynnt. Such upstanding examples of good citizens! The rock solid part of obama's base!
 












So what? We have 2 female candidates for President. Using actual and real statistics: 50% of all women are bi-curious, therefore one of the 2 has had a girl/girl experience. That would be beautiful on film. :cool:

Yeah, you love to talk about the gals, but you don't have the courage of your "convictions" enough to go "brokeback" C'mon Vag, quit being such a hypocrite and give the gals a treat since you seem to think that homosexuality for voyeuristic kicks is such a great thing!:D

But as to politics, let's go with your "so what?" If it's so OK, then let Barry admit to his boyfriends and then let's see if he gets re-elected. I'm fine with that!:D
 






It is rather amusing how the cons think that this board is their personal bitch and moan forum. They expose themselves as the ultimate hypocrites when they complain that the 'libs' mock their so called 'leaders'. The cons here on CP can't have it both ways, but they sure try hard as hell to do so.

You live in a world of hypocrisy and delusion.
 






Yeah, you love to talk about the gals, but you don't have the courage of your "convictions" enough to go "brokeback" C'mon Vag, quit being such a hypocrite and give the gals a treat since you seem to think that homosexuality for voyeuristic kicks is such a great thing!:D

But as to politics, let's go with your "so what?" If it's so OK, then let Barry admit to his boyfriends and then let's see if he gets re-elected. I'm fine with that!:D

A man sharing intimacy with 2 women at the same time is a beautiful thing and a fundamental right protected by our Bill of Rights.
 












Wow! What a sexist hypocrite you are Vag! Some of your lefty lady friends should be taking you to task, if they had any intellectual integrity!:D

Why would they take me to task? I think they should enjoy their sexuality whether it includes a menage a trois now & then or whether it doesn't. What could be more fair?
 






Good post, I just need to make one correction.

You're post should have stated, "Of course we are supposed to think Obama has never even had a BOYFRIEND....."

Now why would I say such a thing? Because if we apply the liberal standard for what constitutes a "legitimate" story such as all the ginned up Sarah Palin "sex scandals", there is at least as much if not more evidence that Obama has had BOYFRIENDS in the past, but of course liberals and their allies in the media would never trade in such "unfounded" rumors, UNLESS it involves a Republican and especially conservatives.

Obama's "man dates" started long before he became president!:D

If we had a conservative Woodward and Bernstein this common knowledge would have long ago hit the front page of the Washington Post.