He meant to say 75% of this month, not for the year or the target. That would be *astronomical* imrpovement in productivity.
If Lilly is adding 3 employees overseas (China), then reducing ~5500 to save 1billion dollars anally, US job loss could be over 9000 to maintan the steady state kinetics of 38,773 employees sans contractors. In that sense, a monthly lay of of ~700 from US facilities mean adding 2100 overseas. Of course, increase FTE in China will bring good news in about 5 years for the company, if serious business conflikt does not arise with China.