Obama beats Perry and Romney in new poll

Quote

Rocknwolf

Guest
Many conservatards are gleeful with the Turner win in NY 9. The idiots on the right blab and slobber about this was a vote against Obama, when the fact is that Weprin was not the best candidate. He didn't even live in the district, but what is more important, if Weiner hadn't disintegrated, he would have won easily, but not to worry folks, the seat will be eliminated.
On the big picture, Obama is regaining support among democrats, who are starting to realize just how bad a conservatard in the white house will e. After Bush and his band of banshees, this country cannot and will not elect another, no matter how many dirty tricks the conservatards and teabagger try to play.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/poll-obama-romney-perry
 






A fiscal conservative is desperately needed.

Many on the dem side are so disillusioned that they will stay home. Considering there are few liberals in the US overall, obama is at very high risk of losing.

The same poll showed his approval with independents dropping and 68% of American's stating the nation is on the wrong track.
 






Rocknwolf said:
Many conservatards are gleeful with the Turner win in NY 9. The idiots on the right blab and slobber about this was a vote against Obama, when the fact is that Weprin was not the best candidate. He didn't even live in the district, but what is more important, if Weiner hadn't disintegrated, he would have won easily, but not to worry folks, the seat will be eliminated.
On the big picture, Obama is regaining support among democrats, who are starting to realize just how bad a conservatard in the white house will e. After Bush and his band of banshees, this country cannot and will not elect another, no matter how many dirty tricks the conservatards and teabagger try to play.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/poll-obama-romney-perry
Click to expand...

1 poll? Take your head out of the sand. If either party thinks this next election is in the bag, they're nuts. The Republicans have omentum going but that momentum is theirs to lose as well. It's entirely possible that either party can lose this election.

James Carvile (a very intelligent strategist said it best) when he said, "I'd rather watch a Republican debate than listen to Obama - and I'm a Demopcrat."
 






Think about that for a minute. Any dem could have won in 2008, any one. Now just 3 very long years later and people are fed up with their messiah. Most analysts state it will just require the right republican candidate for the win. I personally don't think the nation will accept someone far, far right. BUT, they will endorse a fiscal conservative.
 












Here's a great article. It doesn't say he will lose but does point out the key things wrong and why it appears he is heading that way.

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Emerging-Obama-strategy-will-increase-2117286.php

To be safe, a president needs a Gallup job approval of 50 percent or better on Election Day.

The extension of payroll tax relief would literally do nothing new — continuing an existing policy. The infrastructure bank would require significant new spending by Congress as it simultaneously makes difficult, dramatic cuts in discretionary spending. Even in this unlikely event, it is hard to imagine how tens of billions of dollars devoted to roads and bridges would dramatically succeed in boosting job creation where an $800 billion stimulus package did not. Both patent reform and trade agreements are good ideas with little short-term effect on jobs.

Obama may be preparing unexpected policy wonders at Martha's Vineyard, but he cannot change the fact that he made a bad bet. In 2009, he assumed that a staggering economy would recover in a normal cyclical fashion, just in time for his re-election. So he spent his political capital on health care.

The second element of Obama's recovery strategy is to distance himself from a divided, dysfunctional, unpopular Congress. This, of course, is not fully consistent with element one — getting legislative achievements out of an institution you are savaging.

Third, the Obama camp has previewed a campaign of personal attacks against their Republican opponent, whomever it happens to be. As president, Obama has been comfortable practicing the Chicago way of politics.

Obama's cause is far from hopeless. His support has declined but not collapsed. A weak Republican opponent would help. And this emerging strategy — proposing symbolic measures on jobs, bashing an unpopular Congress and discrediting rivals — may be Obama's only option.

For voters, however, this prospect is daunting. Obama's least attractive public attributes are his peevishness and blame shifting.
And this strategy must be a comedown for at least some of the idealists who elected Obama in the first place. There is little distinctive, elevated or inspirational about his message or tactics.
 












Rocknwolf said:
Many conservatards are gleeful with the Turner win in NY 9. The idiots on the right blab and slobber about this was a vote against Obama, when the fact is that Weprin was not the best candidate. He didn't even live in the district, but what is more important, if Weiner hadn't disintegrated, he would have won easily, but not to worry folks, the seat will be eliminated.
On the big picture, Obama is regaining support among democrats, who are starting to realize just how bad a conservatard in the white house will e. After Bush and his band of banshees, this country cannot and will not elect another, no matter how many dirty tricks the conservatards and teabagger try to play.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/poll-obama-romney-perry
Click to expand...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txlXcJDtDwM
 






Bubble Burster said:
You guys are way to quick to jump on Rock just because he lives in a dillusional world. Personally, I rather enjoy watching him engage in his little masturbatory fantasies. My hunting dog can hardly wait to lick his nuts.
Click to expand...

Lady bb, you are just a disgusting old wench. You should be ashamed of practicing bestiality. I think the ASPCA should investigate you and your hunting dog.
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote