NEW Dear Healthcare Provider Letter

Anonymous

Guest
What happened? Anyone?

***
Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Registrant") issued on December 7, 2011 a Dear Healthcare Provider Letter containing new guidance regarding the concurrent use of oral urate-lowering therapies and KRYSTEXXA(R) (pegloticase). In this letter, the Registrant recommends that oral urate-lowering medications be discontinued before a patient begins treatment with KRYSTEXXA, and that therapy with oral urate-lowering agents should not be instituted while the patient is taking KRYSTEXXA. It is important to note that during KYSTEXXA's clinical studies, patients discontinued oral urate-lowering therapy before commencing treatment with KRSYTEXXA. While it is difficult to draw finite conclusions from post-marketing adverse events reporting rates, to date, the Registrant has not seen any unexpected rates of infusion reactions and/or anaphylaxis, which to date remain consistent with the labeling for KRYSTEXXA, and the Registrant continues to closely monitor these events.

This new recommendation relates to an important safety warning already contained in the approved labeling for KRYSTEXXA, which highlights the need to monitor the serum uric acid levels of patients being treated with KRSYTEXXA, as patients who lose therapeutic response, defined as a rise in serum uric acid above 6 mg/dL, are at a higher risk of infusion reaction and anaphylaxis. The monitoring recommendation and its inclusion in the KRYSTEXXA labeling was the result of a post-hoc analysis of data from the KRYSTEXXA Phase 3 clinical trials and an open-label extension study, which further characterized the signs and symptoms of infusion reactions and anaphylaxis and their management in the context of the KRYSTEXXA clinical studies.

The Registrant's review of recent routine post-marketing safety surveillance indicates that some physicians are concurrently prescribing and some patients are concurrently using KRYSTEXXA and oral urate-lowering therapies, primarily allopurinol and febuxostat. The Registrant believes that the concurrent use of these therapies could prevent the detection of patients who have lost therapeutic response to KRYSTEXXA by blunting the rise in serum uric acid and thus interfere with the recommended monitoring of serum uric acid levels in KRSYTEXXA patients. As a result, this concurrent use could mask the detection of those patients who are at a higher risk for developing infusion reactions and/or anaphylaxis and could result in such patients not being discontinued from KRSYTEXXA treatment when warranted.

To ensure that physicians are informed of the risks of concurrent use, the Registrant has notified the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and issued a Dear Healthcare Provider Letter to provide these new recommendations.
 


















what dope used the two together

Some "dopes" who wanted to do what was best for their long-suffering patients without thinking about how that might influence implementation of the stopping rule for KRYSTEXXA. This sounds like another physician education challenge for us -- but we can handle it! It's not that difficult to say that ULTs should be stopped when KRYSTEXXA begins.
 












You shut the fuck up shit for brains, the reason for the FDA involvement and required letter from Savient to the medical community is because off label talk is being shit out by desperate reps to save their jobs and their managers ass.....in the end it is the rep who will get the shaft, remember savient is all about no accountability and finger pointing the other way. Record your every move and document your manager, reps are getting this message the hard way and it is a shame. The sledge bag RBD's and DM's should be careful what they are threatening reps with, it will all come back to bite, and bite that ass hard. If some of the reps would teach and educate and not just vomit up a meaningless canned message than doc's would not be infusing this shit with all the other on boarded meds. Now go fuck yourself, savient understood the REMS agreement, the FDA was clear about micro managing this launch and this is just another fuck up in the long list of errors by a pompous irresponsible senior leadership. That is a fact.
 






You shut the fuck up shit for brains, the reason for the FDA involvement and required letter from Savient to the medical community is because off label talk is being shit out by desperate reps to save their jobs and their managers ass.....in the end it is the rep who will get the shaft, remember savient is all about no accountability and finger pointing the other way. Record your every move and document your manager, reps are getting this message the hard way and it is a shame. The sledge bag RBD's and DM's should be careful what they are threatening reps with, it will all come back to bite, and bite that ass hard. If some of the reps would teach and educate and not just vomit up a meaningless canned message than doc's would not be infusing this shit with all the other on boarded meds. Now go fuck yourself, savient understood the REMS agreement, the FDA was clear about micro managing this launch and this is just another fuck up in the long list of errors by a pompous irresponsible senior leadership. That is a fact.


Yes yes yes, I hear ya dude! I did not come to this place for accountability or leadership, I came to this company the same reason you did, a temporary paycheck in an awful industry and out of necessity. Lets not confuse things here. When the average Savient rep is working 10-2 on Mon and Wed, one really cannot bitch and moan to much can they? Keep your trap shut, we are all in on the take here don't rock the boat, collect the free money and ride the gravy train as it is going to come to a screeching halt next quarter so enjoy your holiday time!!!
 












The problem with Svient is thta none of the Imclone/J&J crew know the data. They listen to what they think are KOLs but their KOLs were never KOLs before but whores that are gracious to speak on behalf of Savient, put their names on manuscripts and take the large checks.
 






The problem with Svient is thta none of the Imclone/J&J crew know the data. They listen to what they think are KOLs but their KOLs were never KOLs before but whores that are gracious to speak on behalf of Savient, put their names on manuscripts and take the large checks.

Do new non-sales hires, especially mngmnt roles, take the product training tests, including disease state, reimbursement etc, to know the info firsthand, or do the newbies just get a waiver ?
 






The old Imcloners are clueless.

Lots of computer spend as JJ thought a Macintosh was an Irish name.
Same with manufacturing; spending millions on second site and still being led by the Brit that didn't know about the problems in Israel so didn't find any of the 483s that delayed approval for 15 months.
The "gal" from legal thinks she knows business development because she can spell it. She ahs nice legs which JJ appreciated.
Rick is clueless.
Our CMO doesn't know the data.