New Article about state of Dendreon's Balance Sheet

Anonymous

Guest
Exactly what I have been saying about the need to raise capital and SOON. Additionally the article tells us the TRUE cash burn rate. Another poster says 49M is not a legitimate number and this article agrees with him. If there is no legitimate definition of cash burn that can lead to a 49M million number, then once again investors are being mislead.

Also be ready for the lunatic fanatic to dismiss the article because it's from Seeking Alpha. The spectrum disorder makes him think that everything is a conspiracy if it might mean he may have finality in his massive Dendreon losses by way of a takeover. It does not matter that a takeover is better for cancer patients. It's all about chasing his losses.

"Dendreon (DNDN) is your typical biotech story, where stagnant sales, a competitive landscape, and a high cash burn ultimately leave the company in the hands of a creditor committee consisting of bond holders. Looking back at history, in the early 2000s, banks were more willing to provide financing to companies such as these in the biotechnology sector. Although banks are lending today, companies such as DNDN will have to provide attractive deal terms to investors who will be willing to take the balance sheet risk. Our thesis here remains that a restructuring of the balance sheet is the only means of survival for the company. All bets are off if this is not dealt with immediately. To illustrate our point, we will discuss the company's balance sheet and its influence on the company's survival.

Competitive landscape for DNDN's Provenge
Recently, the FDA approved Medivation's (MDVN) prostrate cancer drug, which will be sold under the name "Xtandi." This drug will be used for advanced stage prostrate cancer. Its competitiveness has been enhanced by the fact that it was approved a lot sooner than it was originally expected -- approval was anticipated in October or November. Also, Johnson & Johnson's (JNJ) drug, Zytiga will add to the challenge for Provenge. Zytiga generated $432 million in revenues in 2H2012, and Xtandi could possibly generate close to $300 million in revenues by 2013. Provenge has a lot of catching up to do, as sales for 2H2012 were only $160 million. The company claims that there were holes in the sales force and new patients failed to materialize. For us, one thing seems clear -- currently, Provenge is not a preferred option for oncologists and urologists.

State of the balance sheet
As off quarter end June 30, 2012, DNDN has $433 million in cash and short-term investments, and $548 million in long-term debt, which consists of $521 million of 2016 convertible senior notes and $28 million of convertible subordinated notes, due in 2014. Cash burn averages $90 million a quarter, which translates to sufficient liquidity for less than five quarters. Dendreon does not have access to any additional liquidity in the form of a term-loan or credit facility.

Additionally, the company expects to realize $150 million in annual cost savings with its restructuring efforts, which might be a little too late. We always tell companies, "Raise capital when you can, not when you need to." Although the lending environment today does not mirror that of 2008, it is tough environment for companies with lackluster performance. Further, now DNDN has to answer to the convertible holders who are next in line to be paid, too. The Top 3 holders of the 2016 Convertibles are JP Morgan, Camden Asset Management, and Ameriprise Financial. Dendreon will probably need their approval before it can issue more debt or equity.

We can't consider this name as a long-term play until the company is able to resolve its short-term capital needs. We don't think a short idea in the name is relevant today, either. We checked around to find out if one could borrow DNDN stock. We are told there is a -9.95% rebate on anything above 200,000 shares.

Is there hope?
Last quarter, DNDN announced more data analysis on Provenge's effectiveness, saying that it extends the average patient's life by more than a few weeks. This might get the drug some attention, but given the company's liquidity profile, it seems unlikely it can survive without raising new capital. It's possible that DNDN could be bought out by a candidate who truly believes in the growth of Provenge and is willing to take over the $548 million in debt. Finally, DNDN could possibly issue more equity to raise capital. Keep in mind the dilution impact of raising more equity, however.

Conclusion
This leaves us believing that DNDN is a name that has an immediate short-term need to raise capital and clean up its balance sheet. Watch the name closely for management to announce new plans to raise capital.
 






It's clear from the balance sheet that last month's cash burn was $76M with another $5M added to long term debt for a total loss of $81M.

The Seeking Alpha article is a bit odd. They don't point to the large cost of restructuring and the impact that a quarter of lackluster sales will have. That is, the critical point is "one year of cash" which they will hit by the end of this quarter if they account for all of the restructuring costs, but they will say that they have reduced costs by $150M and that they have postponed the restructuring costs (but really, pick one, it's not both!) and claim that this means they aren't there yet.

But, they are and they won't be able to get anyone to loan them money when they are down to 6 months cash.

tic toc
 






Anyone can write a Seeking Alpha article. Anyone. Even an unemployed janitor living in Hollywood.

The $90 million cash usage number is wrong. It was $49 million last quarter and has been falling continously quarter over quarter and the average is well below $90 million. Your lies will not change the facts. From last quarter in $000s:

Total Cash Flow From Operating Activities $43,917
Capital Expenditures $4,671

Total Cash Usage $48,588

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=DNDN

The $49 million number is the correct number. Absolutely the correct number.

The article is idiotic since she can not even get the cash usage number right. You are claiming that the the CFO and the company's auditors lied about historical reported results. You are a lying fool.
 






It's clear from the balance sheet that last month's cash burn was $76M with another $5M added to long term debt for a total loss of $81M.

The Seeking Alpha article is a bit odd. They don't point to the large cost of restructuring and the impact that a quarter of lackluster sales will have. That is, the critical point is "one year of cash" which they will hit by the end of this quarter if they account for all of the restructuring costs, but they will say that they have reduced costs by $150M and that they have postponed the restructuring costs (but really, pick one, it's not both!) and claim that this means they aren't there yet.

But, they are and they won't be able to get anyone to loan them money when they are down to 6 months cash.

tic toc

Agree. The Schiffman cash burn number is so people like this fanatical poster who rode this from 56 to 4 will spread the word. It may be a textbook definition using only operating expenses as cash burn, but the amount cash declines every quarter is much more than that due to expenses that are not operating expenses. When they start giving out severance packages, are billed for massive legal fees, have to pay out settlements if insurance doesnt cover it, having the costs associated with closing down a plant I guess those won't be operating expenses either. Schiffman will still be saying 49M cash burn, this idiot poster will continue to repeat it here and on stock boards but cash will be declining 2 and 3 times the textbook "cash burn" number that Schiffman gives.

The poster that continues to attempt to con people into holding this stock solely to chase his massive losses is the lowest common denominator. The worst kind of scumbag. By trying to prevent a takeover that would be in the best interest of cancer patients, he has blood on his hands.
 






It's clear from the balance sheet that last month's cash burn was $76M with another $5M added to long term debt for a total loss of $81M.

The Seeking Alpha article is a bit odd. They don't point to the large cost of restructuring and the impact that a quarter of lackluster sales will have. That is, the critical point is "one year of cash" which they will hit by the end of this quarter if they account for all of the restructuring costs, but they will say that they have reduced costs by $150M and that they have postponed the restructuring costs (but really, pick one, it's not both!) and claim that this means they aren't there yet.

But, they are and they won't be able to get anyone to loan them money when they are down to 6 months cash.

tic toc

Agree. The Schiffman cash burn number is so people like this fanatical poster who rode this from 56 to 4 will spread the word. It may be a textbook definition using only operating expenses as cash burn, but the amount cash declines every quarter is much more than that due to expenses that are not operating expenses. When they start giving out severance packages, are billed for massive legal fees, have to pay out settlements if insurance doesnt cover it, having the costs associated with closing down a plant I guess those won't be operating expenses either. Schiffman will still be saying 49M cash burn, this idiot poster will continue to repeat it here and on stock boards but cash will be declining 2 and 3 times the textbook "cash burn" number that Schiffman gives.

The poster that continues to attempt to con people into holding this stock solely to chase his massive losses is the lowest common denominator. The worst kind of scumbag. By trying to prevent a takeover that would be in the best interest of cancer patients, he has blood on his hands.
 






"Dendreon (DNDN) is your typical biotech story, where stagnant sales, a competitive landscape, and a high cash burn ultimately leave the company in the hands of a creditor committee consisting of bond holders.

Exactly what I said months ago. The future of this company is in the hands of Jamie Dimon and JP Morgan and they will make sure to do right by the bondholders who are innocent victims.
 






Anyone can write a Seeking Alpha article. Anyone. Even an unemployed janitor living in Hollywood.

The $90 million cash usage number is wrong. It was $49 million last quarter and has been falling continously quarter over quarter and the average is well below $90 million. Your lies will not change the facts. From last quarter in $000s:

Total Cash Flow From Operating Activities $43,917
Capital Expenditures $4,671

Total Cash Usage $48,588

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=DNDN

The $49 million number is the correct number. Absolutely the correct number.

The article is idiotic since she can not even get the cash usage number right. You are claiming that the the CFO and the company's auditors lied about historical reported results. You are a lying fool.

That's the middle of the page, go to the bottom where is say delta cash and cash equivents is over $90. That's the number that counts.
 






That's the middle of the page, go to the bottom where is say delta cash and cash equivents is over $90. That's the number that counts.

He knows that. He wants to repeat the 49M number because its all about chasing his losses.

I do find it funny how that lunatic isnt embarrassed to mention GS as a credible source. This is the same GS who was reaffirming $350-$400 full year guidance and $175-$200 4th q guidance all the way until August 3, 2011.

There is a reason he is still here and it ain't performance or ability. Hmmm....
 






He knows that. He wants to repeat the 49M number because its all about chasing his losses.

I do find it funny how that lunatic isnt embarrassed to mention GS as a credible source. This is the same GS who was reaffirming $350-$400 full year guidance and $175-$200 4th q guidance all the way until August 3, 2011.

There is a reason he is still here and it ain't performance or ability. Hmmm....

I figured it was Greg, he's always in his office on his computer. It can't take that long to make up the numbers, so I figured it was porn, poker, ebay and cafepharma--like all of us in sales. Oops, gotta try to fill a straight in the other window.
 






Two posts in a row of the same stupid nonsense. Now you are having conversations with yourself saying the exact same thing. You truly are an obsessed fool. The $49 million number is exactly the correct number. You are just too fucking stupid to understand basic accounting.


Both short term and long term investments increased from Q1 to Q2 by around $50 million. How to you explain that r*****?

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=DNDN

Are you that clueless that you include purchases of US Treasury Notes in cash usage. Yes you are.


You are a mentally ill obsessed moron with a vendetta against Dendreon. You are here to misinform and lie so that you can profit from your short position.

You are a serial liar that has chased away sales reps. You are the one with blood on your hands. You have harmed cancer patients. I have done nothing against cancer patients.

Don't you have any toilets to clean, or were you fired from that job too?
 






Two posts in a row of the same stupid nonsense. Now you are having conversations with yourself saying the exact same thing. You truly are an obsessed fool. The $49 million number is exactly the correct number. You are just too fucking stupid to understand basic accounting.


Both short term and long term investments increased from Q1 to Q2 by around $50 million. How to you explain that r*****?

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=DNDN

Are you that clueless that you include purchases of US Treasury Notes in cash usage. Yes you are.


You are a mentally ill obsessed moron with a vendetta against Dendreon. You are here to misinform and lie so that you can profit from your short position.

You are a serial liar that has chased away sales reps. You are the one with blood on your hands. You have harmed cancer patients. I have done nothing against cancer patients.

Don't you have any toilets to clean, or were you fired from that job too?


change in cash equivalents over $90M

loss over $80M

rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic all you want, $49M is just that, it's going down
 






change in cash equivalents over $90M

loss over $80M

rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic all you want, $49M is just that, it's going down

Rearranging deck chairs also included moving Gold from CEO to Board of Directors. Obviously he still has a very important connection with Dendreon in his position of Director.

"A board of directors is a group of people legally charged with the responsibility to govern a corporation."

Mitch Gold, of all people, at this very moment has a legal responsibility as part of a group for Dendreon's governance. How is this allowed? How is this possible?
 












Lie all you want the correct cash burn number lasdt quarter is $49 million. Your ignorant lies can not change that. The only thing going down is you mother.

You are crazy. I observe this board and hesitate to post here because of you. You can quote the CFO all you want. He works for the company and made a statement about cash burn that is not a lie but has nothing to do with a company that is quarters away from having to raise cash. You and him keep talking about a cash burn number of 49M but if he doesnt address the balance sheet issues to the public very soon, there is the risk of more and more lawsuits. I am shocked there isn't yet a class action suit about something else not covered in the others that happened later. I bought a lot of shares at 14 this year. Where is my class action? I guess the law firms are so sure of their case as it stands, the one this year won't even matter.
 






It's clear from the balance sheet that last month's cash burn was $76M with another $5M added to long term debt for a total loss of $81M.

The Seeking Alpha article is a bit odd. They don't point to the large cost of restructuring and the impact that a quarter of lackluster sales will have. That is, the critical point is "one year of cash" which they will hit by the end of this quarter if they account for all of the restructuring costs, but they will say that they have reduced costs by $150M and that they have postponed the restructuring costs (but really, pick one, it's not both!) and claim that this means they aren't there yet.

But, they are and they won't be able to get anyone to loan them money when they are down to 6 months cash.

tic toc

Agree about the article being odd. By not mentioning the huge restructuring and possible huge legal costs on the horizon the article seems to have a bias in making things not seem as desperate as they really are.
 






Unfortunately, the CafePharma Dendreon board has been infiltrated by a lot of short sellers who are currently shorting Dendreon stock. The person who is talking about the former CEO and/or about the Board of Directors and/or about the financial situation of Dendreon on CafePharma is probably a Dendreon short.

They know that Provenge is very effective. They also know that the re-org in Dendreon's Sales organization is nearly done and that the new team is doing great.

They have absolutely no interest in a job with Dendreon, and are only here to spread rumors, fear and misinformation. They are not really a candidate for any job with Dendreon. Their only objective here is to create fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD). They are only pretending that they have been interviewed for job, offered a job, or they turned down a job offer.

I would ignore any person who is not posting questions or information about job opportunities with Dendreon.
 












Investment banks that placed the bonds won't let them write any more, so we are stuck with dilution.

We are going to have to dilute, it's just when. We'll be down to an amount of cash less than the next year of losses very soon. (yes Greg, we know about the $49M number you like, but all the same, the whole loss has to be covered, all the cash and cash equivalents is important, you can't keep the accounting tricks going forever).

Seeing the large restructure cost and 3qtr sales will do the usual thing to the stock.

It'd be best to take the both hits of that and the dilution together.

We'll be lucky to place a large shelf for more than $2-$2.50, e.g. something like 70-80% of the share price after the next earnings call. We'll need to place at least 100M shares minimum to kick the can a year down the road.