NICE - http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=42209
Anonymous Guest Anonymous   Jun 20, 2013 at 02:08: PM #1 Anonymous Guest NICE - http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=42209
Anonymous Guest Anonymous   Jun 24, 2013 at 01:35: PM #3 Anonymous Guest It's the same as the existing cautery hook with the exception they fixed all the first gen problems! But I guess it's substantially equivalent huh?
It's the same as the existing cautery hook with the exception they fixed all the first gen problems! But I guess it's substantially equivalent huh?
Anonymous Guest Anonymous   Jun 24, 2013 at 01:40: PM #4 Anonymous Guest Anonymous said: It's the same as the existing cautery hook with the exception they fixed all the first gen problems! But I guess it's substantially equivalent huh? Click to expand... Here's the correct link just incase you get questioned by your docs on why the Single Site Cautery Hook needed to get reapproved by the FDA. They must have fixed major problems. I bet it looks totally different. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=42255
Anonymous said: It's the same as the existing cautery hook with the exception they fixed all the first gen problems! But I guess it's substantially equivalent huh? Click to expand... Here's the correct link just incase you get questioned by your docs on why the Single Site Cautery Hook needed to get reapproved by the FDA. They must have fixed major problems. I bet it looks totally different. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=42255
Anonymous Guest Anonymous   Jun 26, 2013 at 12:15: AM #5 Anonymous Guest who cares, its not a game changer
Anonymous Guest Anonymous   Jun 26, 2013 at 12:42: PM #6 Anonymous Guest One more sand in the vagina complainer! Anonymous said: who cares, its not a game changer Click to expand...
One more sand in the vagina complainer! Anonymous said: who cares, its not a game changer Click to expand...