National Meeting

Anonymous

Guest
What a great time to pull everyone out of the field for a week!! I thought the 4th Qtr was do or die.. ?? Yes it is only 3 full days but the west won't get back in the field on Th. Thanks for making us travel all day on Sunday too. What is the point of this meeting?
 






What a great time to pull everyone out of the field for a week!! I thought the 4th Qtr was do or die.. ?? Yes it is only 3 full days but the west won't get back in the field on Th. Thanks for making us travel all day on Sunday too. What is the point of this meeting?

August sales were only $20M, big brainstorm meeting to figure out how to keep the whole company from going down too fast.
 






August sales were only $20M, big brainstorm meeting to figure out how to keep the whole company from going down too fast.

If that 20M number is accurate, then next earnings could sink this ship. Don't forget September 30 is the end of the quarter and some funds may have to sell due to price being under 5.
 


































































August sales were not $20 million. July was 28.23 and August 26.43 with September projected at 26.5 for a total just over $81 million.

With so few days in September, the D'Enron forecasters are at it again!

Those are specific numbers, but I'd be shocked at a Sept that was stronger than August.

It looks like a steady month to month slide since early in the year.
 












With so few days in September, the D'Enron forecasters are at it again!

Those are specific numbers, but I'd be shocked at a Sept that was stronger than August.

It looks like a steady month to month slide since early in the year.

Agree but if that 20M number wasn't accurate, it shouldnt be here unless that was really thought to be the number by the poster.

Does anyone know if the specific numbers with decimals are right or the 20M number? They seem to be far off and I'm trying to figure out who is more credible on this.

Either way, I have no problem with D'Enron forecasters. They couldnt help when CEO and others didn't use their forecasts.
 












Agree but if that 20M number wasn't accurate, it shouldnt be here unless that was really thought to be the number by the poster.

Does anyone know if the specific numbers with decimals are right or the 20M number? They seem to be far off and I'm trying to figure out who is more credible on this.

Either way, I have no problem with D'Enron forecasters. They couldnt help when CEO and others didn't use their forecasts.

I've heard they've been "running in the low 20's" each month. That might be an optimistic
way of saying "barely over 20", but would certainly be out of line with the numbers with decimals.

We know Greg posts here, repeating his $49M of cash burn in Q2 claim (gotta be him since nobody else believes it), so maybe the decimals are right, or maybe they are like the $49M number (which is really $76M or $81M) and will become the official fudge numbers. (I can imagine it now: "this quarter we counted as sales, well, stuff we made up since it wasn't working to only make up future numbers")
 












We know Greg posts here, repeating his $49M of cash burn in Q2 claim (gotta be him since nobody else believes it), so maybe the decimals are right, or maybe they are like the $49M number (which is really $76M or $81M) and will become the official fudge numbers. (I can imagine it now: "this quarter we counted as sales, well, stuff we made up since it wasn't working to only make up future numbers")

And we all know from past actions he doesn't care/know law so might think its ok to post inside information. If those numbers with the decimals are true, the poster (whoever it is) broke federal securities laws. If those numbers turn out to be accurate, GS can be asked under oath with a federal subpoena if those numbers came from him or if not him, who else would know those numbers so specifically. The post is screenshotted and ready to be turned over to authorities if those numbers turn out accurate.