Bubble Burster
Guest
Bubble Burster
Guest
I find it fascinating that left-wingers can almost never argue the validity of their positions on the merits.
Like little children, liberals have a limited attention span, which explains why they post so many threads along the lines of "[insert conservative name] is a(n) [insert offensive epithet here]".
Take a look at the posts on this board. Rather than logically arguing the benefits of their positions, left wingers usually go immediately into attack mode. When confronted with a conservative who insists on fact-based dialogue, liberals will:
1. Abandon the thread.
2. Call the other guy a scoundrel, then abandon the thread.
There are two reasons why left-wingers don't discuss the validity of their positions:
1. Their positions have no validity.
2. Liberals are unable to explain their positions.
Like little children, liberals have a limited attention span, which explains why they post so many threads along the lines of "[insert conservative name] is a(n) [insert offensive epithet here]".
Take a look at the posts on this board. Rather than logically arguing the benefits of their positions, left wingers usually go immediately into attack mode. When confronted with a conservative who insists on fact-based dialogue, liberals will:
1. Abandon the thread.
2. Call the other guy a scoundrel, then abandon the thread.
There are two reasons why left-wingers don't discuss the validity of their positions:
1. Their positions have no validity.
2. Liberals are unable to explain their positions.
Rational, adj. Devoid of all delusions save those of observation, experience, and reflection. - Ambrose Bierce