Merck has been ranking reps like this for years...

Anonymous

Guest
No wonder no one collaborates:

Microsoft told employees on Tuesday that it's ending its so-called "stack-ranking" system. Under Microsoft's infamous system, workers were ranked on a curve, and those at the low end would be fired or dealt with in some way. The goal in stopping these rankings is to focus more "on teamwork and collaboration," according to an internal memo human-resources chief Lisa Brummel sent to Microsoft employees, which The Verge got its hands on.
 




No wonder no one collaborates:

Microsoft told employees on Tuesday that it's ending its so-called "stack-ranking" system. Under Microsoft's infamous system, workers were ranked on a curve, and those at the low end would be fired or dealt with in some way. The goal in stopping these rankings is to focus more "on teamwork and collaboration," according to an internal memo human-resources chief Lisa Brummel sent to Microsoft employees, which The Verge got its hands on.

Merck talks big about teamwork then uses a forced ranking system that fosters an "every man for himself" mentality. Two polar opposite concepts if there ever was one. Look no further than Allergan to see the destruction this system creates. One year you're a VP winner flying to Hawaii, the next year you're having multiple ride alongs with everyone from region directors and trainers, to rescue plan visits with your manager. I always thought Allergan had the most toxic demotivating environment in the industry but it looks like Merck is eyeing that top spot