Loan What does it mean?

Anonymous

Guest
Can someone with an advanced degree in finance do an assessment on what this loan agreement will mean for B+L. Does this mean that B+L needs to layoff people to have enough money to payback the loan? Do they have enough money to buy ISTA? What happens if B+L decides to go public. Will this loan decrease the value of the company? Will B+L have to sell its Vision Care division to payback this loan?


http://www.reuters.com/article/2012...0419?feedType=RSS&feedName=rbssHealthcareNews
 






While you wait for somebody to break down what it financially means... This preliminary $3.5b loan looks like it is a way of refinancing debt to allow consolidation of many different loans to B+L, as well as to create the cash to purchase Ista. I equate this move to refinancing your home loan and second loan while creating enough equity to purchase a car. I'm sure Warburg Pincus will get a nice payday if this loan should go through the way they structure it. They will load B+L up with debt and line their pockets with the cash. An acquisition is a good way to filter some money to private equity.
 






While you wait for somebody to break down what it financially means... This preliminary $3.5b loan looks like it is a way of refinancing debt to allow consolidation of many different loans to B+L, as well as to create the cash to purchase Ista. I equate this move to refinancing your home loan and second loan while creating enough equity to purchase a car. I'm sure Warburg Pincus will get a nice payday if this loan should go through the way they structure it. They will load B+L up with debt and line their pockets with the cash. An acquisition is a good way to filter some money to private equity.

Why the banks give out the loans for these risky investments that line Private equity with protected cash from creditors baffles me. Do the banks really think they will make money off the deal? What about losing your shirt if B+L goes bankrupt? Seems like the crazy world of Home mortgages replaying itself.
 






Why the banks give out the loans for these risky investments that line Private equity with protected cash from creditors baffles me. Do the banks really think they will make money off the deal? What about losing your shirt if B+L goes bankrupt? Seems like the crazy world of Home mortgages replaying itself.

You wonder if B+L's only reason for existence is to secure these crazy loans from banks so cash can be diverted to the WP private equity firm.
 






You can read the Wikipedia article on leveraged buyouts, but essentially WP is taking max loans at a low interest rate to (1) get huge returns on the money they invested in 2007 and (2) reduce the tax on the returns to their investment. Since 2007, they have virtually tripled the debt load to buy B&L, Eyeonics, and ISTA, thereby leveraging up their relatively small equity investment. These loans are secured by the hard assets owned by the 3 companies and will be paid back by increasing cash flow through efficiencies (that is, layoffs and site closures). Specifically, "because of the importance of debt and the ability of the acquired firm to make regular loan payments after the completion of a leveraged buyout, some features of potential target firms make for more attractive leverage buyout candidates, including:
A multi-year history of stable and recurring cash flows;
Hard assets (property, plant and equipment, inventory, receivables) that may be used as collateral for lower cost secured debt;
The potential for new management to make operational or other improvements to the firm to boost cash flows, such as workforce reductions or eliminations;
Market conditions and perceptions that depress the valuation or stock price."
 












The usual scenario with PE is that they buy a house worth a million dollars, take out 3 million in loans on it, any way they can, then eventually have the house foreclosed on wherein the creditors end up having to fight over the equity and in such a case get paid 30 cents on the dollar. In the meantime the PE company has made a profit of 2M. This is probably where we're headed as it is no longer set up to be sold. That's why the ISTA price doesn't make sense insofar as strengthening the corporation but merely allowing more cash flow and allowing more of a debt load to placed upon it.
 






IPO is all that is left. Although, bringing a company with this much debt into an IPO does not seem possible. Also the competition does not have the same amount of debt so can put more money into R&D thus out competing bausch in the long run.

WP is doing nothing substantial to contain costs. Multiple facilities doing the same thing. A Mid management that has been in place for years.

This does not look like a viable company. Perhaps the only measurement left is how long this organization can maintain its high salaries for management before it goes bust. I am estimating 5 years left max.