Lilly Tests New Schizophrenia Drug

Anonymous

Guest
HEALTH INDUSTRY APRIL 26, 2011

Lilly Tests New Schizophrenia Drug
By PETER LOFTUS wsj.com

Eli Lilly & Co. hopes to introduce the first of a new class of schizophrenia drugs that sidesteps the weight gain linked to current treatments—and which might work best in people with a certain genetic makeup.

After seeing signs of promise in earlier tests, Indianapolis-based Lilly recently started large-scale, late-stage clinical trials of the drug, code-named LY2140023, some of which are expected to be completed by early 2013.

If the trials are successful and regulators approve it, the drug could hit the market in 2014 and eventually generate $1 billion in peak annual sales, estimated BMO Capital Markets analyst Robert Hazlett. "It's a novel approach that appears to be effective, at least modestly," Mr. Hazlett said.

Lilly is betting on the schizophrenia drug and other potential new products to help replace revenue due to be lost in coming years to patent expirations that trigger generic competition for top-selling drugs, including its antipsychotic Zyprexa.

There is no guarantee the Lilly drug's safety, efficacy or genetic link will be born out by the larger clinical trials. While weight gain may not be an issue, there have been other safety and efficacy issues in trials to date. Even if the drug makes it to market, it will face competition from cheaper generics and possibly newer schizophrenia drugs under development at such companies as Roche Holding AG.

Lilly says there is an unmet medical need in schizophrenia, a mental illness in which patients experience hallucinations, delusions and other symptoms. Widely used drugs known as atypical antipsychotics–which include Zyprexa and AstraZeneca PLC's Seroquel–carry safety risks including weight gain and elevated blood sugar (the companies have paid hundreds of millions of dollars to settle lawsuits alleging the drugs caused diabetes and other injuries).

LY2140023 is designed to stimulate substances in the brain known as metabotropic glutamate receptors, or mGlu for short. This approach differs from atypicals, which generally block the effects of the chemical dopamine in the brain.

One midstage study published in Nature Medicine in 2007 showed Lilly's drug improved symptoms versus a placebo and didn't increase the risk of weight gain. "It's actually a side-effect profile that's much more attractive from a long-term view," said Jan Lundberg, head of Lilly's research and development arm.

In another study released in 2009, however, the drug performed no better than placebo. But Lilly deemed the outcome inconclusive because the study's design may have contributed to higher-than-normal improvements in placebo recipients.

In a six-month safety study presented at a medical conference this month, the drug was comparable to standard treatments including Zyprexa in the time to treatment discontinuation due to lack of tolerability. However, discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was significantly greater for LY2140023 compared with standard treatment. Mr. Hazlett, the BMO analyst, said the drug's efficacy is acceptable but not its strong suit.

Lilly's LY2140023 was associated with higher rates of insomnia, vomiting, agitation and indigestion, while patients on standard treatment had higher rates of weight gain and a movement disorder.

One patient in the trial had two seizures a day after discontinuing three weeks of treatment of the Lilly drug and initiating treatment with a conventional antipsychotic. The patient recovered with no residual side effects, researchers reported.

Joseph T. Coyle, a professor of psychiatry and neuroscience at Harvard Medical School who has studied the role of glutamate receptors in schizophrenia, said the Lilly drug has potential to improve treatment of so-called negative symptoms of the disease, which include social withdrawal, and cognitive symptoms, while avoiding weight gain. But he said that needs to be proved in late-stage trials. He has consulted for Lilly previously but isn't directly involved in developing Lilly's mGlu drug.

The potential genetic angle is part of a broader shift toward "personalized medicine," or the use of genetic information to determine whether individual patients are likely to respond to certain drugs.

A study published last year in the Pharmacogenomics Journal found patients with certain DNA sequences treated with the Lilly drug showed the largest reduction in schizophrenia symptoms.

"Intriguing preliminary data suggest it could be possible to identify a subpopulation of patients which responds better," Mr. Lundberg said. Lilly will track how LY2140023 performs in a predefined genetic subpopulation of patients in its late-stage trials, he said.

Dr. Coyle called the potential genetic link "preliminary," and said more comprehensive genetic analysis would be needed before concluding that it will be possible to identify in advance which patients are likely to benefit from the Lilly drug.
 












The heck with how it works on psychosis. The big bucks are in knocking the lights out of seniors in nursing homes so they're not a pain in the ass.

Let's just hope the soon to be constituted FDE sales force bones up on their off-label messaging tactics.

Five at Five!
 






The heck with how it works on psychosis. The big bucks are in knocking the lights out of seniors in nursing homes so they're not a pain in the ass.

Let's just hope the soon to be constituted FDE sales force bones up on their off-label messaging tactics.

Five at Five!

Hey that's pretty mean. You know those kinds of words can get someone canned at best, or another billion dollar fine at worst. Really!
 












Re: Viva mGluRxxa

¡VIVA mGluRXXA!Get ready for blockbuster litigation...perhaps the first $ Trillion damage payouts--and it doesn't even differentiate from placebo!!!

I always wondered where that buzz after cheap Chinese food came from ... until I was in the alley behind the restaurant and saw empty 50-kg drums!
 






Lorabid Redux

A 50 Kg drum of LY2140023 would have COPS of $100,000,000,000 even after FIPNetting to the lowest of 3rd world gutter operations (other than LTC) This is truly a Lorabid-like disaster of complex synthesis folly, only to : 1) Not differentiate from placebo and 2) be up against generic EVERYTHING. What a way to destroy neurons.
 






mGluRgle

Dear Lil'lie brain science geniuses:
Which normal human emotion does this excitotoxic mGluR activator turn into a disease? Please answer quickly, we need to get back to our brokers...OKTHANKSBYE.
 












The heck with how it works on psychosis. The big bucks are in knocking the lights out of seniors in nursing homes so they're not a pain in the ass.

Let's just hope the soon to be constituted FDE sales force bones up on their off-label messaging tactics.

Five at Five!

Is R E the new project manager of this soon to be breakthrough drug? It's time for Lilly to go with the man who has led this company through the nursing home debacle with Zyprexa. Here's to you Bobby!
 


















In some cultures, which I will not name, the "mentally ill" were forced into long marches to exhaust them and make them sleep. Almost 100% success rate.

We have so much to learn, grasshopper.
 












LillyPipeline

The latest news from Eli Lilly Wednesday: another drug has failed to impress, namely its investigational schizophrenia treatment dubbed mGlu2/3. The company said in a statement that it failed to show any big difference between patients taking the drug and those taking a placebo. The treatment addresses schizophrenia from a different angle – interacting with glutamate receptors, as opposed to dopamine receptors. The hope is that the new mechanism would help patients avoid the downsides associated with schizophrenia drugs, including weight gain and diabetes.
The company is going forward with two other clinical trials on the product, but the latest results further dim hopes for Lilly's Phase III pipeline, which includes the Alzheimer's treatment, solanezumab, which analysts have largely written off as a lost cause.
Like its peers, the Indianapolis, IN, company is trying to slow its patent cliff decline. Recent losses include the schizophrenia drug Zyprexa (olanzapine), which went off patent in October 2011 and had first quarter sales plummet 56% this year compared to the same period in 2011. Anti-depressant Cymbalta (duloxetine) continues to be a strong earner, bringing in 23% more in sales during the first quarter compared to the same period in 2011 and $4 billion last year, a 20% increase over 2010. But Cymbalta, which provided 17% of company sales last year, is set to lose exclusivity in 2013, despite a six-month reprieve after two Phase III studies prompted the FDA to grant pediatric exclusivity. Also going off-patent next year is Lilly's diabetes therapy Humalog, whose almost $3 billion in sales represented 10% of revenues last year. This sweep leaves ED drug Cialis (8% of last year's revenues), osteoporosis treatment Evista (4% of last year's revenues) and ADHD drug Straterra (3% of last year's revenues) it its wake.
Lilly has also been battling mediocre results. The company had three years to position its blood thinner Effient as the swap for Bristol-Myers Squibb's Plavix, which went generic this year. Yet the drug's black-box warning has kept physicians at bay, and has become a direct target of marketers for competing products. The company also pulled its drug Xigris (drotrecogin) from the market last year because it failed to help patients with severe shock or sepsis.
The company has reduced its workforce by approximately 25% since 2004, and has pared back its sales force by about 33% since 2009. Its latest annual report reiterates a strategy that has been emphasized since 2009: no massive acquisitions and continued investment in partnerships and R&D. Acquisitions include the 2011 purchase of the animal health business from J&J subsidiary Janssen and, in 2010, those of Avid and Alnara, along with European marketing rights to Pfizer's animal health business. Lilly also boasts partnerships with universities that give the company first-dibs on treatments.
The company releases second quarter results July 25.
 






Re: LillyPipeline

The latest news from Eli Lilly Wednesday: another drug has failed to impress, namely its investigational schizophrenia treatment dubbed mGlu2/3. The company said in a statement that it failed to show any big difference between patients taking the drug and those taking a placebo. The treatment addresses schizophrenia from a different angle – interacting with glutamate receptors, as opposed to dopamine receptors. The hope is that the new mechanism would help patients avoid the downsides associated with schizophrenia drugs, including weight gain and diabetes.
The company is going forward with two other clinical trials on the product, but the latest results further dim hopes for Lilly's Phase III pipeline, which includes the Alzheimer's treatment, solanezumab, which analysts have largely written off as a lost cause.
Like its peers, the Indianapolis, IN, company is trying to slow its patent cliff decline. Recent losses include the schizophrenia drug Zyprexa (olanzapine), which went off patent in October 2011 and had first quarter sales plummet 56% this year compared to the same period in 2011. Anti-depressant Cymbalta (duloxetine) continues to be a strong earner, bringing in 23% more in sales during the first quarter compared to the same period in 2011 and $4 billion last year, a 20% increase over 2010. But Cymbalta, which provided 17% of company sales last year, is set to lose exclusivity in 2013, despite a six-month reprieve after two Phase III studies prompted the FDA to grant pediatric exclusivity. Also going off-patent next year is Lilly's diabetes therapy Humalog, whose almost $3 billion in sales represented 10% of revenues last year. This sweep leaves ED drug Cialis (8% of last year's revenues), osteoporosis treatment Evista (4% of last year's revenues) and ADHD drug Straterra (3% of last year's revenues) it its wake.
Lilly has also been battling mediocre results. The company had three years to position its blood thinner Effient as the swap for Bristol-Myers Squibb's Plavix, which went generic this year. Yet the drug's black-box warning has kept physicians at bay, and has become a direct target of marketers for competing products. The company also pulled its drug Xigris (drotrecogin) from the market last year because it failed to help patients with severe shock or sepsis.
The company has reduced its workforce by approximately 25% since 2004, and has pared back its sales force by about 33% since 2009. Its latest annual report reiterates a strategy that has been emphasized since 2009: no massive acquisitions and continued investment in partnerships and R&D. Acquisitions include the 2011 purchase of the animal health business from J&J subsidiary Janssen and, in 2010, those of Avid and Alnara, along with European marketing rights to Pfizer's animal health business. Lilly also boasts partnerships with universities that give the company first-dibs on treatments.
The company releases second quarter results July 25.

bye bye, NSD...we hardly knew thee...
 






Dr. John Lechleiter has been Chairman, President, and CEO of Eli Lilly(LLY_) since April 2008, although his career with the company stretches back to 1979 and he's been a member of the executive team since 2001. Over the past five years, Lechleiter has received nearly $50 million in total compensation, despite Lilly shares badly underperforming the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and every other pharmaceutical stock in its peer group. The 10-year data look even worse. Lilly outperforms only Pfizer(PFE_), thanks to the albatross-like leadership of former Pfizer CEO Henry McKinnell.
Lilly's persistent underperformance is no fluke. The company has had one failure after the next, both commercially and clinically. Management has earned this track record through a series of strategic missteps and bad decisions. Last week, for example, pomaglumetad methionil failed as a treatment for schizophrenia, joining semagacestat in Alzheimer's disease, Arxxant for diabetic retinopathy, necitumumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, and other drugs in the ranks of recent Lilly R&D flops. Lilly's Alzheimer's drug candidate solanezumab will probably be next to disappoint.
Astonishingly, shareholders have barely lifted a finger in complaint. This speaks in part to the protective power of the dividend -- Lilly's has nearly a 5% yield -- but also to investor unwillingness to speak out against management. Lilly should be restructured aggressively -- the company has one of Big Pharma's most bloated cost structures -- and creatively reimagined. (Management scoffs at any suggestion that its R&D spending might be inefficient.) Unfortunately, much-needed change at Lilly doesn't seem likely until the company's failures become so flagrantly embarrassing that even the most dividend-obsessed shareholder loses patience. That's too long to wait
 






It's as though shareholders have forgotten who actually owns the company.
It's time for investors to stand up and remind management who is boss.
Dr. John Lechleiter has been Chairman, President, and CEO of Eli Lilly(LLY) since April 2008, although his career with the company stretches back to 1979 and he's been a member of the executive team since 2001. Over the past five years, Lechleiter has received nearly $50 million in total compensation, despite Lilly shares badly underperforming the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and every other pharmaceutical stock in its peer group. The 10-year data look even worse. Lilly outperforms only Pfizer(PFE), thanks to the albatross-like leadership of former Pfizer CEO Henry McKinnell.
Lilly's persistent underperformance is no fluke. The company has had one failure after the next, both commercially and clinically. Management has earned this track record through a series of strategic missteps and bad decisions. Last week, for example, pomaglumetad methionil failed as a treatment for schizophrenia, joining semagacestat in Alzheimer's disease, Arxxant for diabetic retinopathy, necitumumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, and other drugs in the ranks of recent Lilly R&D flops. Lilly's Alzheimer's drug candidate solanezumab will probably be next to disappoint.
Astonishingly, shareholders have barely lifted a finger in complaint. This speaks in part to the protective power of the dividend -- Lilly's has nearly a 5% yield -- but also to investor unwillingness to speak out against management. Lilly should be restructured aggressively - the company has one of Big Pharma's most bloated cost structures -- and creatively reimagined. (Management scoffs at any suggestion that its R&D spending might be inefficient.) Unfortunately, much-needed change at Lilly doesn't seem likely until the company's failures become so flagrantly embarrassing that even the most dividend-obsessed shareholder loses patience. That's too long to wait.