Is this a serious question? Our stock is down 14% since November. She may be able to charm people in MN but her guidance isn't exactly making stockholders any money and if you work at Patterson your a stock holder. I realize its not all her but the FSS division is a trainwreck and no matter how "nice" or "smart" she is, it amounts to nothing when I look at the way our company is being run overall. Lets look at things shall we. Anderson the day after the qtrly earnings report came out and said we have to cut expenses, if you travel, stay as inexpensive as possible, eat as cheaply as possible, " the next 6 months are going to be a real test for our people blah blah blah" etc... They're not going to hire (unless its in MN and its another VP) to save money. If we're put on "rations" so to speak out in the field then how good of a financial guru is she? I mean lets look at this, if we have to watch our pennies then whats she doing? Whats her team of people doing there in MN? I guess one could say she's awesome, she's made a ton of money here at Patterson, last I checked several million dollars. But thats not the issue. If we want to discuss leadership then we need to start with those actually leading the company, Anderson and Misiak.