ISS Recommends Special Meeting

Anonymous

Guest
LAVAL, Quebec and NEW YORK, Aug. 6, 2014 (Canada NewsWire via COMTEX) -- Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ("Valeant") VRX +0.03% CA:VRX -1.05% and Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. ("Pershing Square") today commented on Institutional Shareholder Services' ("ISS") recommendation in support of Pershing Square's effort to call a special meeting of Allergan shareholders. Pershing Square is seeking to call a special meeting to address a number of important matters, including the removal of six incumbent directors from the Allergan Board, which has failed to do any reasonable investigation of the Valeant offer.

ISS has recommended that shareholders of Allergan, Inc. AGN -0.05% PROVIDE CONSENT and complete and return all necessary documents required to call a special meeting of Allergan shareholders. Earlier this week, Glass Lewis also supported Pershing Square's effort to call a special meeting.

In its report, ISS commented on Valeant's and Allergan's business models and track records:

"Many of the initiatives [Allergan] has announced, moreover--reducing R&D and SG&A expense, looking at acquisitions--are strategies Valeant has used to enormous success over the tenure of its current CEO. This suggests both that there is merit in these business strategies, if Allergan can choose as wisely and execute as well and as boldly as Valeant --and also, perhaps, that Allergan's relentless criticism of the Valeant business model is rooted less in the conviction Valeant's model is dangerously flawed than in the conviction anything outside of the defensive perimeter should be scorched."*

In addition, ISS criticized Allergan's bylaw provisions:

"As a response to the deeper question of why Allergan's bylaw constraints were an appropriate response to the shareholder mandate to provide certain governance rights, by contrast, it appears to have been an exercise in concealing what was never worth finding: the Allergan bylaws are far more restrictive than any of the comparator companies the board apparently reviewed, with no discernable advantage for Allergan shareholders. … The risk from which these bylaws "protect" shareholders, to put it bluntly, is the risk that they will be treated as owners, and asked to make serious and important decisions about the future of their company."

"We are pleased that ISS, along with Glass Lewis, has affirmed that Allergan shareholders deserve the opportunity to have their voices heard and support a special meeting of Allergan shareholders," said Bill Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square. "The ISS Report should cause Allergan shareholders to question the credibility of a Board that is pursuing frivolous litigation tactics and baseless attacks to delay or stop the right for shareholders to fix anti-shareholder bylaws, elect shareholder-friendly directors and to voice their concerns about Allergan's poor corporate governance. The board's approach to the Special Meeting is consistent with how they have handled the Valeant offer - the board continues to ignore its fiduciary responsibilities to engage with Valeant and properly analyze and consider the benefits and shareholder value that can be created by the potential business combination as well as other alternatives."

J. Michael Pearson, Valeant chairman and chief executive officer, commented, "Our offer represents a significant premium to Allergan's unaffected stock price, and shareholders should have the right to determine for themselves whether they want to pursue this enormously value-creating transaction. Given the Allergan board's repeated refusal to engage in good faith negotiations with Valeant, their 'scorched earth' campaign of unjustified attacks on Valeant's business and their efforts to prevent Allergan shareholders from voicing their perspectives on our offer, we believe that the only path forward is to replace a majority of the Allergan board, remove Allergan's anti-shareholder governance provisions and allow investors the opportunity to decide the outcome of this transaction. Valeant remains committed to pursuing this compelling transaction, which will create an unrivaled platform for growth and value creation in healthcare."

It looks like ISS was pretty blunt about the AGN Board. This is getting exciting....I got my popcorn.
 




That's about the most scathing report I can remember from ISS.

when a relatively objective 3rd party with that much influence comes out that far on one side, you can bet investors are listening. Maybe Valeant's not employee friendly, maybe there are some questions, but this basically says we're not exactly the good guys when it comes to shareholder value.

yowzers
 




Yes, surprisingly more critical of Allergan than expected.

The ISS and Glass Lewis recommendations will give cover to institutional shareholders to join the call for a special meeting. If Ackman is on schedule, that call might come next week (Mid August).
 




Actually what the report says, in a few words, is that mgmt has built a fortress around itself and does not care about shareholders messing around with it. This is very common in modern public companies. They are typically run for management's benefit rather than the shareholders. Shareholders are always at the bottom of the pile and they are the ones who actually lose when a company goes bankrupt. This is still very exciting though. I am loving this drama. This is my entertainment nowadays since I cut the cord.
 




Actually what the report says, in a few words, is that mgmt has built a fortress around itself and does not care about shareholders messing around with it. This is very common in modern public companies. They are typically run for management's benefit rather than the shareholders. Shareholders are always at the bottom of the pile and they are the ones who actually lose when a company goes bankrupt. This is still very exciting though. I am loving this drama. This is my entertainment nowadays since I cut the cord.

If shareholders were in the bottom of the shitty pile, then why did Allergan layoff 1500 to increase EPS?
 




The market has spoken with the share prices--the only things that matter. ISS's recommendation is completely irrelevant as both stocks traded downward for hours after it came out--meaning 100% that the deal is dead. Investors don't care about the ISS recommendation, they care about the fact that VRX is going down like the Titanic and they're looking for lifeboats.
 




If shareholders were in the bottom of the shitty pile, then why did Allergan layoff 1500 to increase EPS?

Because Ackman/Pearson came on board and rocked the boat. "Activists" do not go after every company. They pick the ones they think are the easiest. Obviously, they were wrong and AGN board is putting up a fight.
 
















So basically, Pearson and Ackman are trying to play the peoples' champions even though this is all clearly being done to benefit Valeant, more so than Allergan shareholders.
 




All this crap about shareholders, shareholders voice, shareholders must be heard. Understandable, what happens when the shareholders consist of a large portion of arbs and short term interest? Is allowing them to decide really what's best for the company and long term shareholders?
 




All this crap about shareholders, shareholders voice, shareholders must be heard. Understandable, what happens when the shareholders consist of a large portion of arbs and short term interest? Is allowing them to decide really what's best for the company and long term shareholders?

I love u brother/sister
 




All this crap about shareholders, shareholders voice, shareholders must be heard. Understandable, what happens when the shareholders consist of a large portion of arbs and short term interest? Is allowing them to decide really what's best for the company and long term shareholders?

Sorry comrade, they own the company. Read up on capitalism.
 




All this crap about shareholders, shareholders voice, shareholders must be heard. Understandable, what happens when the shareholders consist of a large portion of arbs and short term interest? Is allowing them to decide really what's best for the company and long term shareholders?

Shareholders are owners of our company long term / short term doesn't matter and as owners their rights are unalienable with regards to ownership issues.

Having said that, these recommendations are non binding on the BoD. Our BoD will still wait for the proxies to be delivered by Pershing, validating those proxies, awaiting for result of insider trading + fraud lawsuit, if the lawsuit is not in favor then appeal it, if the lawsuit is in favor then respond to Pershing's appeal, take maximum time i.e 4 months after the lawsuit to call the special meeting etc. This will go well into 2015. Meanwhile the BoD will work on special dividend / buyback / acquisition.

Valeant will have to deploy Plan B / buyback to keep it's stock from falling. No one in the market believes that Valeant can wait till next year without major acquisition / buyback both of which reduce funds available for Allergan. Another very important aspect is that sometime in 2nd quarter of 2015 we should be having interest rate increases which will explode Valeant's debt servicing. Hence Allergan shareholders do not like Valeant's equity.

Keep in mind that all the arbs got in after the April 22nd. So their average acquisition price is well above today's price. Arbs are not "in the money" for this trade. Let's see how long the arbs can endure.
 




Shareholders are owners of our company long term / short term doesn't matter and as owners their rights are unalienable with regards to ownership issues.

Having said that, these recommendations are non binding on the BoD. Our BoD will still wait for the proxies to be delivered by Pershing, validating those proxies, awaiting for result of insider trading + fraud lawsuit, if the lawsuit is not in favor then appeal it, if the lawsuit is in favor then respond to Pershing's appeal, take maximum time i.e 4 months after the lawsuit to call the special meeting etc. This will go well into 2015. Meanwhile the BoD will work on special dividend / buyback / acquisition.

Valeant will have to deploy Plan B / buyback to keep it's stock from falling. No one in the market believes that Valeant can wait till next year without major acquisition / buyback both of which reduce funds available for Allergan. Another very important aspect is that sometime in 2nd quarter of 2015 we should be having interest rate increases which will explode Valeant's debt servicing. Hence Allergan shareholders do not like Valeant's equity.

Keep in mind that all the arbs got in after the April 22nd. So their average acquisition price is well above today's price. Arbs are not "in the money" for this trade. Let's see how long the arbs can endure.

Agreed, Valeant can't wait until 2015. They will probably announce another acquisition (plan B) before the end of the month. What Pershing does will be interesting.
 




This is over guys. Now that ISS and the other one (what's their name?) have chimed in, the board will get scared. They will be worried about personal liability and stab DP in the back. Send resumes folks....
 












This is over guys. Now that ISS and the other one (what's their name?) have chimed in, the board will get scared. They will be worried about personal liability and stab DP in the back. Send resumes folks....

Could you guys please post if you are valeant troll or ackman intern since you spout same stuff