Is your boss a bully?







Fúćķ yes, mine was. There are crappy people who happened to become boss with ego bigger than the universe.

http://msn.careerbuilder.com/Articl...sl42537&sc_extcmp=JS_2537_spotlight&gt1=23000

That's spot on! I had a couple really bad bosses at Lilly - neither of them had even close to the capacity or temperament - but then, only a complete fool or a glutton for punishment would be a "leader" at Lilly. Can't give any details publicly but if I did, it would be in a Comedy Club.... hmmm comedychannel ... maybe.
 






That's spot on! I had a couple really bad bosses at Lilly - neither of them had even close to the capacity or temperament - but then, only a complete fool or a glutton for punishment would be a "leader" at Lilly. Can't give any details publicly but if I did, it would be in a Comedy Club.... hmmm comedychannel ... maybe.

which makes even jack in the box cl a fool - - - okay, but a rich one.
 






which makes even jack in the box cl a fool - - - okay, but a rich one.

Most rich fools are just beneficiaries of dumb luck, but look at their lifespan (more indicative of intelligence on average) - most die at 45-60 y.o., so if you are right, the grim reaper is waiting and smiling. I hope you are not right. It was so sad to see Gus blow his head off. When something so completely foolish like that occurs, you really have to wonder, "do I really want to work for this company" - especially if you have options.

Personally I like the advice of older guys whose heads are still intact, maybe 80+ years old ... even Warren Buffet does not qualify - yet. Because, time is more valuable than money, and all those millions won't buy you another day if you have sold your soul.
 






Fúćķ yes, mine was. There are crappy people who happened to become boss with ego bigger than the universe.

http://msn.careerbuilder.com/Articl...sl42537&sc_extcmp=JS_2537_spotlight&gt1=23000

I can think of a number of boss and management that could be thought of as good people and good bosses who were respected.

I can no longer think of anyone, including current and recent bosses, who is a good person or a good boss. The last 2 bosses have been bullies and narcisits who were allowed to manage since they have been willing to do the dirty work that is required. All that matters now is their survival and to not be held accountable for anything. Always make sure there is someone in place to blame if needed, but be able to take credit for whatever they can.

Who are Bullies at Lilly right now? Know of any? Initials or names will work.

One famous bully at Lilly is CIO MH. A classic bully.
 






I can think of a number of boss and management that could be thought of as good people and good bosses who were respected.

I can no longer think of anyone, including current and recent bosses, who is a good person or a good boss. The last 2 bosses have been bullies and narcisits who were allowed to manage since they have been willing to do the dirty work that is required. All that matters now is their survival and to not be held accountable for anything. Always make sure there is someone in place to blame if needed, but be able to take credit for whatever they can.

Who are Bullies at Lilly right now? Know of any? Initials or names will work.

One famous bully at Lilly is CIO MH. A classic bully.

I would not give the incompetents such attention. They will only get promoted and sell out more of their "friends" ... he's my friend, she's my friend ... yeah right ... you need friends like that like you need a Gus-hole-in-your-head.
 






Leadership by fear or bullying is a thing of the past, most managers lead this way when they are incapable of being intelligent enough to seek solutions and work with their teams. It is just a cycle that repeats until the business goes under, because the bullying lion usually pushes their way to the management position but when there don't have the intelligence to do anything with it. If the senior executives recognize this, they would have respectable, intelligent and leaders that have integrity and accountability versus being a bully. Sad thing is, they will bring down a business and the people under them.
 






Leadership by fear or bullying is a thing of the past, most managers lead this way when they are incapable of being intelligent enough to seek solutions and work with their teams. It is just a cycle that repeats until the business goes under, because the bullying lion usually pushes their way to the management position but when there don't have the intelligence to do anything with it. If the senior executives recognize this, they would have respectable, intelligent and leaders that have integrity and accountability versus being a bully. Sad thing is, they will bring down a business and the people under them.

All that matters in the new world is that the manager will pretend to care and pull the trigger without missing their next meeting.

The playbook looks something like this:

Observe and acknowledge what happened.

Most people experience the impact as a loss (never considering it a gain as we do). Acknowledge their experience (admit nothing), listen to what's important to them (not us), and (just) demonstrate (don't actually believe) that their views matter.

Allow feelings to surface.

Provide people with (temporary) nonthreatening environments to express their feelings (so we can gage them on the surface). (Any kind) of conversations can be helpful in creating a safe (estimation as to where they all stand) without emotions hiding underground.

Get and give support.

Help people recognize where (in the heirarchy) they are stuck and how they can shift from blaming (us) to problem solving (the unintended side effects we created). Also, make sure that no one is moving ahead blindly (without us knowing and controlling every step this time). Share key information and insights (only as needed) to help employees (seemingly) feel involved and “in the know.” And seek support for yourself (in defense against them) through fellow leaders (for there is strength in numbers and lawyers).

Reframe the experience.

Put the experience into a larger context. Don't let them focus on individual experiences. Help people to see the bigger picture (because misery loves company and will help difuse the individual sense of loss). Help people to consider the individual choices and opportunities (we are forcing) in front of them, including "potential" benefits (as if keeping
their existing jobs or returning to a lost job is actually a "new" gift/opportunity).

Take responsibility.

Own up to what is yours to own (on a personal level but don't blame the company as a whole). Determine the lessons learned and the actions you can take to improve (the swiftness and decisiveness of the actions in the future). Hold yourself accountable (until they've signed the unilateral waiver from the legal office), plus help others take responsibility and hold themselves accountable (for having voted for the officials that enabled the expansion of the NAFTA treaty to include PACRIM and allow the outsourcing to Asian territories).

Forgive yourself and others.

Acknowledge the impact of broken trust and then agree to move through (quickly without apologizing because some of them might be getting desperate). Learn from it and do better going forward (so that next time this will go more smoothly for us). Ask people, “What needs to happen for forgiveness to take place?” (It will make them "feel" better to get it off their chests.) Additionally, ask yourself the same question if you need to forgive yourself. (You should after all. Jesus forgave. Still got nailed for it, but he forgave.)

Let go and move on.

There is a difference between remembering and “hanging on.” Employees may not forget what happened, but they can choose to look forward rather than ("hang on" to the notion that we'll do this again). Help people in letting go and moving on with a sense of shared responsibility (because somehow, it is their fault too).
 












Someone tell philanthropist George Soros, who owns a large block of Lilly stock, which is "cooked" to appear as if the business is doing better every year. Cutting expenses only goes so far, as the New FDA is more concerned with reality after 8 ostrich years, head in sand...
 






J Reid Smith, Steve Paul, Bill Chin, Mark Harman, Joseph Klinefelter, Meredith Glasstone, Miriam Byrd, Sventa Popolikulis, J Yingling, Bharvin KR Patel, Wayne Shoemaker, Uwe Horowitz and name I have collecxted from several divisions finance, regulatory, DCRT, Global IT, Management and HR.
 






J Reid Smith, Steve Paul, Bill Chin, Mark Harman, Joseph Klinefelter, Meredith Glasstone, Miriam Byrd, Sventa Popolikulis, J Yingling, Bharvin KR Patel, Wayne Shoemaker, Uwe Horowitz and name I have collecxted from several divisions finance, regulatory, DCRT, Global IT, Management and HR.

At least you have been bullied by diversity.
 


















Speaking of which, there are now two VP's of Cancer Research? How does JY fit into the scheme with the new VP of Cancer Research in NYC over Onc Res & ImClone?

Only two VP's? That's way understaffed. My FIPNET plans call for two VP's for every Lilly worker bee. You can never have too much management watching over those minions I always say. A couple $700,000 a year VP's will keep those minions from stealing a stapler or #2 pencil. Those VP's are worth every penny.

$$ JL $$
 


















Most schools have anti bully programs as they have learned lessons from school shooting and other violence that bullying yields violence and tragedy. Bullys are sent home from school. It seems like the corporate world would learn from the schools. Instead Lilly selects bully to be management and encourages supervisors to bully people and make their lives miserable to encourage people to leave.

Given the following definition, there are a lot of bullies at Lilly. They are the survivors at Lilly.

bul·ly1    
[bool-ee] Show IPA
noun, plural -lies, verb, -lied, -ly·ing, adjective, interjection
–noun
1.
a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people.
2.
Archaic . a man hired to do violence.
3.
Obsolete . a pimp; procurer.
4.
Obsolete . good friend; good fellow.
5.
Obsolete . sweetheart; darling.
–verb (used with object)
6.
to act the bully toward; intimidate; domineer.
–verb (used without object)
7.
to be loudly arrogant and overbearing.
 






Whistleblower Law is to protect people from companies and corporations that hire and develop bullys.

In every whistleblow case that I have known, the subordinates are induced, conduced, and forces to hide the truth which can be injurious to corporate income. Take Zyprexa case. Only a threatened worker revealed the bully, for which he was unjustly fired, and then we got the 1.6billion one time charges.

Same thing with Enron, Philip Morris, AT&T (the NSA tap of american phones), etc.. are all due to bully.

Lilly is under tremendous pressure no doubt. But presence of bullys cannot and should not be tolerated, or else spilled beans will cost far more than traditional houseblend coffee-like situation.
 






Diversity

Yet another plea for diversity, but what we need is time and tolerance as a company. Time to do the experiment, tolerance to allow the experiment to take place and then robust critique. It’s the western tradition. I could buy diversity of culture in a company if diversity of thought equated to diversity of culture. Is history not taught any longer? The Persian, Greek, Roman, Renaissance and Enlightenment cultures moved the world forward due to the accretion of like minded thinkers prepared to critique the ideas of that culture not by saying, sorry people cant answer that question got to attract a whole new diverse culture. In short the critical problems once identified need to be broadened to the problem solving culture that already exists and solution finder rewarded