Well, Jack Welch, while head of GE, would annually fire the bottom 10% of staff who were apparently the poorest performers. At the same time, GE became increasingly reliant upon the Chinese for their outsourcing needs. Why did they need to outsource so much if the poor performers were regularly purged from the workforce?
This approach needs to be examined, I agree. Sometimes it's "the fox guarding the henhouse" when it comes to compensation. For a good answer, I would probably not ask employees. I would probably hire an outside firm (yes, I would use the FIPNET approach) to determine where to cut expenses. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results. If you don't bring some fresh opinions, the only choice is to get new opinions through mergers or acquisitions, in the manner which new drug science and technology is sourced through acquisitions. Why not obtain new management through acquisitions? Just a thought. Nothing that has to happen overnight, or even this year, but soon - your retirements depend upon a fiscally sound Eli Lilly.