anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Is it true that Pfizer is requiring Reps. to be vaccinated before being able to return to the field?
Very easy to fake card. Just say you have and move onYes. You have to attest you have been vaccinated and submit a copy of your card to HR. But also involves each state’s vaccination rates. If less than 50% then mandatory. Think only 2 states were over 50% am they were tiny. If u r in multiple states the state u resends in takes precedent. If u r looking at other companies some are stating on application you need to be vaccinated.
It's to cover their asses politically. They don't give a shit about their employees
Reps are so damn stupidLooking forward to suing them and including as many managers as possible.
Which company is this?I'm here snooping around bc I heard same thing from a friend. Wanted to see how reps are handling it. I work for another company who just came out and said it is required for all immediately or else. also requiring proof to HR.
To say nothing of the fact that there is NO data whatsoever that getting the shot reduces the spread of the virus. This has been such a power trip by collectivist minded people and organizations it's almost ghastly. I definitely know who to avoid now, starting with this company and it's smarmy little band of snot nosed lawyers.I refuse to “fake a card” I will not give into this nonsense, and you shouldn’t either. It is borderline unethical to require reps to get a shot that has only been approved for emergency use. We now have the lowest number of COVID cases since the virus started. Some of us have already had the virus. Some people cannot take the shot, also there is NO DATA on how the immune system responds when getting a vaccine if you’ve already had COVID. What’s wrong with the world is people that would rather “fake a card” instead of standing up for what they believe in.
Let me guess, you voted for TrumpTo say nothing of the fact that there is NO data whatsoever that getting the shot reduces the spread of the virus. This has been such a power trip by collectivist minded people and organizations it's almost ghastly. I definitely know who to avoid now, starting with this company and it's smarmy little band of snot nosed lawyers.
Let me guess, you voted for TrumpTo say nothing of the fact that there is NO data whatsoever that getting the shot reduces the spread of the virus. This has been such a power trip by collectivist minded people and organizations it's almost ghastly. I definitely know who to avoid now, starting with this company and it's smarmy little band of snot nosed lawyers.
I read the study, there is no data on transmission. Here's the deal:To say nothing of the fact that there is NO data whatsoever that getting the shot reduces the spread of the virus. This has been such a power trip by collectivist minded people and organizations it's almost ghastly. I definitely know who to avoid now, starting with this company and it's smarmy little band of snot nosed lawyers.
Ok please help me understand this part- can a pharmaceutical company have a 3rd party pull immunization data without our consent?
- Federal EEO laws do not prevent or limit employers from offering incentives to employees to voluntarily provide documentation or other confirmation of vaccination obtained from a third party (not the employer) in the community, such as a pharmacy, personal health care provider, or public clinic. If employers choose to obtain vaccination information from their employees, employers must keep vaccination information confidential pursuant to the ADA.
maybe then the stock price will go up .50They are going to make $26 billion off this thing and still let more than half of us go by the end of the year.
No, unfortunately it will not. It will crack $45 then quickly tumble back into the lower 40's, then upper 30's.maybe then the stock price will go up .50