Is Irvine Campus Too Costly to Keep?

Quote




Yes, Irvine is not ideal as a location because of cost but it willl survive this first round after integration...Pfizer's CEO is on record saying they want to keep the talent in the therapeutic areas allergan competes. Site closure is not the issue. Will you like the role, your new management structure, culture those are the concerns at least for the next 18 months.
 




anonymous said:
Yes, Irvine is not ideal as a location because of cost but it willl survive this first round after integration...Pfizer's CEO is on record saying they want to keep the talent in the therapeutic areas allergan competes. Site closure is not the issue. Will you like the role, your new management structure, culture those are the concerns at least for the next 18 months.
Click to expand...
Who will remain in management roles at Irvine?
 








anonymous said:
Yes, Irvine is not ideal as a location because of cost but it willl survive this first round after integration...Pfizer's CEO is on record saying they want to keep the talent in the therapeutic areas allergan competes. Site closure is not the issue. Will you like the role, your new management structure, culture those are the concerns at least for the next 18 months.
Click to expand...
The handful of management that Pfizer wants to keep can be easily relocated. Irvine is not needed at all and nearly all non-management staff will lose their jobs through site closure as this is the logical cost-cutting choice that will cheer shareholders at both Pfizer and Allergan.
 
























anonymous said:
Botox is made in Ireland. Botox research will relocate to Ireland and Irvine shut down completely.
Click to expand...
You have no clue what you are talking about, I would just say that your statement is not accurate. Dont want to talk too much on a public forum. you also don't seem to understand what it takes to do research and how 'easy' it is to move to a different part of the country let alone a different continent.
 




anonymous said:
You have no clue what you are talking about, I would just say that your statement is not accurate. Dont want to talk too much on a public forum. you also don't seem to understand what it takes to do research and how 'easy' it is to move to a different part of the country let alone a different continent.
Click to expand...

+100
 




As far as California goes, though, a couple of key Allergan businesses--aesthetics and eye care--will be staying put even as the company works to integrate with its merger partner on the opposite coast.
 




anonymous said:
The handful of management that Pfizer wants to keep can be easily relocated. Irvine is not needed at all and nearly all non-management staff will lose their jobs through site closure as this is the logical cost-cutting choice that will cheer shareholders at both Pfizer and Allergan.
Click to expand...

I think it's true, and I see jobs that I could commute to - but I've been here 9+years and I don't want to walk awY from the severe money
 








anonymous said:
Yes, Irvine is not ideal as a location because of cost but it willl survive this first round after integration...Pfizer's CEO is on record saying they want to keep the talent in the therapeutic areas allergan competes. Site closure is not the issue. Will you like the role, your new management structure, culture those are the concerns at least for the next 18 months.
Click to expand...

Yup
 




Top Bottom
Back
Quote