IRA

anonymous

Guest
If Austedo suffers the wrath of the IRA, does that mean teva will manufacture a generic Ingreza? I saw on fierce pharma that Teva is getting paid by us not to manufacture generic valbenazine. But if they lose Austedo, would Teva market a generic Ingrezza? I also realize none of this could happen since the gov has not listed the second round drugs yet.
 






If Austedo suffers the wrath of the IRA, does that mean teva will manufacture a generic Ingreza? I saw on fierce pharma that Teva is getting paid by us not to manufacture generic valbenazine. But if they lose Austedo, would Teva market a generic Ingrezza? I also realize none of this could happen since the gov has not listed the second round drugs yet.
I dont think the Irish Republican Army is too concerned with Austedo
 










































If Austedo suffers the wrath of the IRA, does that mean teva will manufacture a generic Ingreza? I saw on fierce pharma that Teva is getting paid by us not to manufacture generic valbenazine. But if they lose Austedo, would Teva market a generic Ingrezza? I also realize none of this could happen since the gov has not listed the second round drugs yet.
Teva could choose to use Austendo’s generic version, but there’s no real benefit. A negotiated price won’t start until January 2007, and that price will likely be higher than a price set by the market for generics.

Last year's drug list gave discounts between 38% and 79%, with those prices becoming effective in 2026. However, generic drugs are usually 80% to 85% cheaper than brand-name versions, so keeping exclusivity still has advantages. The competition (other brand-name VMAT2 drugs) will suffer as much or more compared to Austendo given negligible differentiation.

The current pro-business government is expected to reduce or remove the effects of CMS negotiated prices, so it’s probably not something to worry about too m
uch.