Has HIV FRM Screening Started?

Quote







I told u so said:
What a dead end position, NON-revenue, producing non-revenue producing these are going nowhere and we’re lucky to be viable for two years.
Click to expand...
I told u so said:
Partially correct. Will the position last... probably not. Two years is probably about right but the positions will definitely help pull through in the beginning. If you 've never done the role then you may not fully understand but FRM's will have a significant role at least for the first year and half to two years.
Click to expand...
 


















I keep hearing they're hiring a bunch of ViiV FRM's. They don't do anything over there. All you need to do is ask the reps. So now Gilead is going to hire a bunch of them and pay them more to basically do the same here. It's a joke.
 















anonymous said:
I keep hearing they're hiring a bunch of ViiV FRM's. They don't do anything over there. All you need to do is ask the reps. So now Gilead is going to hire a bunch of them and pay them more to basically do the same here. It's a joke.
Click to expand...
Bad Move!
Although experience has its merits, if the goal is building a high-energy, performance-driven team, to execute a Launch then hiring a hungry, motivated underdog is often the better choice.

Hiring someone with little experience but strong motivation because they have something to prove is often the better choice & here’s why:

1. Higher Drive & Hunger for Success
A person with something to prove is more likely to go the extra mile- working harder, learning faster, and doing whatever it takes to succeed.

They’re less complacent compared to veterans who may have settled into a routine & lost their edge.

2. Greater Adaptability & Willingness to Learn
Newer talent is more willing to try new approaches instead of being stuck in a defeated mindset, the very mindset that harmed the Apretude Launch, that’s locked into this is how we’ve always done it, type of thinking.

3. Fresh Perspective & Innovation
Lack of experience often leads to out-of-the-box creative thinking; questioning outdated processes and looking for more efficient ways to get things done.

4. No Ego, Just Results
Veterans often come with a sense of entitlement or rigid expectations, while someone with something to prove is often humble, eager, and focused on performance rather than status, making them more likely to embrace challenges head-on.

5. Stronger Work Ethic & Passion
When someone is motivated by personal stakes (like proving themselves), they naturally put in more effort.

They often work with a sense of urgency and accountability, whereas veterans might rely more on the fact they they’ve been in the role for years over pushing for daily performance.


A Motivated Underdog is better than an industry veteran in high stakes roles that require adaptability, creativity, and resilience, where work ethic trumps credentials. Positions just like this, a launch that Has To Be Successful, where industry experience isn’t as valuable as drive and innovation. Again, look no further than the launch failure of Apretude.
 



anonymous said:
Bad Move!
Although experience has its merits, if the goal is building a high-energy, performance-driven team, to execute a Launch then hiring a hungry, motivated underdog is often the better choice.

Hiring someone with little experience but strong motivation because they have something to prove is often the better choice & here’s why:

1. Higher Drive & Hunger for Success
A person with something to prove is more likely to go the extra mile- working harder, learning faster, and doing whatever it takes to succeed.

They’re less complacent compared to veterans who may have settled into a routine & lost their edge.

2. Greater Adaptability & Willingness to Learn
Newer talent is more willing to try new approaches instead of being stuck in a defeated mindset, the very mindset that harmed the Apretude Launch, that’s locked into this is how we’ve always done it, type of thinking.

3. Fresh Perspective & Innovation
Lack of experience often leads to out-of-the-box creative thinking; questioning outdated processes and looking for more efficient ways to get things done.

4. No Ego, Just Results
Veterans often come with a sense of entitlement or rigid expectations, while someone with something to prove is often humble, eager, and focused on performance rather than status, making them more likely to embrace challenges head-on.

5. Stronger Work Ethic & Passion
When someone is motivated by personal stakes (like proving themselves), they naturally put in more effort.

They often work with a sense of urgency and accountability, whereas veterans might rely more on the fact they they’ve been in the role for years over pushing for daily performance.


A Motivated Underdog is better than an industry veteran in high stakes roles that require adaptability, creativity, and resilience, where work ethic trumps credentials. Positions just like this, a launch that Has To Be Successful, where industry experience isn’t as valuable as drive and innovation. Again, look no further than the launch failure of Apretude.
Click to expand...
OK. This is the second post on a quest to discredit vets in the field. Are you a new college grad? Are you just trying to cut cost? Is this Elon by any chance? Are there some vets that don't have a good work ethic? Yes, but as a hiring manager, do your homework and research. Ask the right questions in interviews. You can tell when people aren't really putting in the work with their answers. I interviewed someone recently with another RD and red flags went off about this candidate for me. I sensed a potential issue with work ethic but he was hired and sure enough he does not put in the work. He didn't even keep up with training or simply learning how to navigate the sales aid in the iPad. Bad choice.
 









anonymous said:
Bad Move!
Although experience has its merits, if the goal is building a high-energy, performance-driven team, to execute a Launch then hiring a hungry, motivated underdog is often the better choice.

Hiring someone with little experience but strong motivation because they have something to prove is often the better choice & here’s why:

1. Higher Drive & Hunger for Success
A person with something to prove is more likely to go the extra mile- working harder, learning faster, and doing whatever it takes to succeed.

They’re less complacent compared to veterans who may have settled into a routine & lost their edge.

2. Greater Adaptability & Willingness to Learn
Newer talent is more willing to try new approaches instead of being stuck in a defeated mindset, the very mindset that harmed the Apretude Launch, that’s locked into this is how we’ve always done it, type of thinking.

3. Fresh Perspective & Innovation
Lack of experience often leads to out-of-the-box creative thinking; questioning outdated processes and looking for more efficient ways to get things done.

4. No Ego, Just Results
Veterans often come with a sense of entitlement or rigid expectations, while someone with something to prove is often humble, eager, and focused on performance rather than status, making them more likely to embrace challenges head-on.

5. Stronger Work Ethic & Passion
When someone is motivated by personal stakes (like proving themselves), they naturally put in more effort.

They often work with a sense of urgency and accountability, whereas veterans might rely more on the fact they they’ve been in the role for years over pushing for daily performance.


A Motivated Underdog is better than an industry veteran in high stakes roles that require adaptability, creativity, and resilience, where work ethic trumps credentials. Positions just like this, a launch that Has To Be Successful, where industry experience isn’t as valuable as drive and innovation. Again, look no further than the launch failure of Apretude.
Click to expand...
What a clown summary. Apertude failed to launch due to lack of strategy as Viiv diluted their talent pool with a primary care approach and lack of hiv experience and access. Exactly what we are doing with Gilead now..getting some of their bums over here. As for vets, they are assets especially within the G but most people can’t look past their own alphabet soup and get past their ego. Vets are the way to go and not the inexperienced try hard who think they can manifest their way to the top. Sorry pal. You clearly have zero leadership experience and assume you are also a PCP prepster.
 









Top Bottom
Back
Quote