Global Temperatures in 2010 Tied Warmest on Record

Breakingnews

Well-Known Member
NASA weather analysis found 2010 tied 2005 for the title of warmest year on record, according to an analysis released on Wednesday by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS).

http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/story/44423/global-temperatures-in-2010-ti-1.asp

Also, the carbon dioxide level has increased about 40 percent since the Industrial Revolution . . .

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/22/science/earth/22carbon.html?_r=1

Still the deniers will persist with their weak and worn out arguements against AGW.
 












WOW!!!

A tie?

It was a tie?

ROFLMAO

I don't know what is funnier. The headline or the fact that BrokebackChancre is still peddling Goober Warming as if anyone is buying it.

Good stuff
 






WOW!!!

A tie?

It was a tie?

ROFLMAO

I don't know what is funnier. The headline or the fact that BrokebackChancre is still peddling Goober Warming as if anyone is buying it.

Good stuff

I think it is a riot that you chose to respond with yet another Triple U Post.

Unfunny, Uninspired, Unreadable

Keep up the great work, slackjaw.
 






























Translation: I just got takne to the house again and this is the best response I could come up with.

It's still fun pulling your strings like the good little puppet you are.


Maybe you could define what you mean by taken to the house? You posted a thread about a tie in "global temperatures" and that is your idea of "taking someone to the house"?

Seriously?

ROFLMAO. OK Jared, whatever you say
 
























Also, the carbon dioxide level has increased about 40 percent since the Industrial Revolution . . .

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/22/science/earth/22carbon.html?_r=1

Still the deniers will persist with their weak and worn out arguements against AGW.

From the article:

In an interview in La Jolla, Dr. Keeling’s widow, Louise, said that if her husband had lived to see the hardening of the political battle lines over climate change, he would have been dismayed.

“He was a registered Republican,” she said. “He just didn’t think of it as a political issue at all.”

He's right, it shouldn't be a political issue, since we all live on this planet and will all be affected. Repubs are dumb to have politicized this issue, because they've painted themselves into a corner and will no doubt be on the losing side of history one way or another. I’m not optimistic that we will be able to reverse course and save the planets ecosystem, but ones things for sure, if we can’t first acknowledge that there’s a problem, like an alcoholic in denial there will be no chance for solutions.
 






From the article:



He's right, it shouldn't be a political issue, since we all live on this planet and will all be affected. Repubs are dumb to have politicized this issue, because they've painted themselves into a corner and will no doubt be on the losing side of history one way or another. I’m not optimistic that we will be able to reverse course and save the planets ecosystem, but ones things for sure, if we can’t first acknowledge that there’s a problem, like an alcoholic in denial there will be no chance for solutions.

I caught AnalNews saying that CO2 has increased 40% since the IR.

But warming has not.

In fact, it has leveled off in the last 15 years or so, while CO2 has increased even more.

Thanks for playing.