From the CHURCH of AL GORE





































You have to hand it to these global warming nutjobs, they have all their bases covered. The cold and snow, rain, sleet, melting glaciers, frozen glaciers, mudslides, floods, high tide, low tide, tornadoes, earthquakes, sunamis all are a cause of global warming.

These libtards know that after years and years of doing it in politics, it is hard to argue a point when you make anything and everything a biproduct of your initial argument.
 






I find it truly amazing that anyone actually believes in Goober Warming. I realize why Algore is pushing the scam. He stands to make billions off of it.

But, the loser libtardiots here stand to gain nothing and are only being used as the fools they are.
 


















The idot AGW morons say everything is caused by global warming. Don't be surprised if they say if the Steelers win...global warming. If the Packers win...global warming.


You understand, of course, that things get linked back to Global Warming because its a scientific fact. And the rationale for increased moisture in the atmosphere because of warming is pretty solid, if you know anything about basic physics.
 






You understand, of course, that things get linked back to Global Warming because its a scientific fact. And the rationale for increased moisture in the atmosphere because of warming is pretty solid, if you know anything about basic physics.


Then why did they get it wrong when they predicted that there would be less snow and more droughts?

Seems to me you guys attribute EVERY single weather event to Goober Warming.

I am still surprised that so called intelligent people still believe these lies. Come on, tell me the truth. You don't really believe this shit do you? Come on.
 






Then why did they get it wrong when they predicted that there would be less snow and more droughts?

Seems to me you guys attribute EVERY single weather event to Goober Warming.

I am still surprised that so called intelligent people still believe these lies. Come on, tell me the truth. You don't really believe this shit do you? Come on.

I heard Rush Limbaugh say this yesterday. You repeat his thoughts very well.

When a scientific idea is confirmed by multiple lines of science and has a very solid theory that has been challenged and upheld for a few decades, and the evidence clearly points toward the truth of that idea, I end up believing it. Thats how science works.

It up to you to explain how dumping gigatons of CO2 into the atmopshere is magically not having the effects that have been OBSERVED AND PREDICTED over the last two or three decades.

Or you can just prattle on about Al Gore and pretend that there is not reams of real science behind this theory, which is about as solid as the germ theory of disease at this point.
 






I heard Rush Limbaugh say this yesterday. You repeat his thoughts very well.

When a scientific idea is confirmed by multiple lines of science and has a very solid theory that has been challenged and upheld for a few decades, and the evidence clearly points toward the truth of that idea, I end up believing it. Thats how science works.

It up to you to explain how dumping gigatons of CO2 into the atmopshere is magically not having the effects that have been OBSERVED AND PREDICTED over the last two or three decades.

Or you can just prattle on about Al Gore and pretend that there is not reams of real science behind this theory, which is about as solid as the germ theory of disease at this point.


See Post #10 in this thread and that should blow away your typical libtardiot Rush Limbaugh nonsense. Do all of you libtardiots operate from the same manual?

Tell us what the percentage of man made CO2 is in our atmosphere? Can you?

The science is on quicksand. Everyone knows it. It is settled science. Goober Warming is a scam
 






See Post #10 in this thread and that should blow away your typical libtardiot Rush Limbaugh nonsense. Do all of you libtardiots operate from the same manual?

Tell us what the percentage of man made CO2 is in our atmosphere? Can you?

The science is on quicksand. Everyone knows it. It is settled science. Goober Warming is a scam

You ignore the fact that the actual scientists who are doing the work have no doubt that global warming is taking place. Climatologists, Biologists, Physicists, Chemists all agree on the basics of the mechanisms and effects. The magnitude is also known, and the only thing that isnt settled is the magnitude in the future.

Libtardiot is a mildly amusing name, but I can assure you that the basis of this issue is neither conservative or liberal. Its hard science.

I can show you reams of internet links showing homeopathy works. I can even cite experts who belive it and lots of anecdotes to show it is effective. But only someone with a serious bent on ignoring all science would belive in that crap. And thats what you are doing with global warming... denying obvious science because it interferes with your predetermined beliefs.
 






You ignore the fact that the actual scientists who are doing the work have no doubt that global warming is taking place. Climatologists, Biologists, Physicists, Chemists all agree on the basics of the mechanisms and effects. The magnitude is also known, and the only thing that isnt settled is the magnitude in the future.

Libtardiot is a mildly amusing name, but I can assure you that the basis of this issue is neither conservative or liberal. Its hard science.

I can show you reams of internet links showing homeopathy works. I can even cite experts who belive it and lots of anecdotes to show it is effective. But only someone with a serious bent on ignoring all science would belive in that crap. And thats what you are doing with global warming... denying obvious science because it interferes with your predetermined beliefs.


Well, since it is all settled as you say, then you can quickly answer a few questions.

1) What is the percentage of man made CO2 in our atmosphere?
2) What should it be?
3) What is the ideal "global temperature"? What are we shooting for?
4) How will you know that reducing carbon will work?
5) How does the cloud formation fit into the global warming models?

I await your "scientific" answers ;)
 






Well, since it is all settled as you say, then you can quickly answer a few questions.

1) What is the percentage of man made CO2 in our atmosphere?
2) What should it be?
3) What is the ideal "global temperature"? What are we shooting for?
4) How will you know that reducing carbon will work?
5) How does the cloud formation fit into the global warming models?

I await your "scientific" answers ;)

Why dont you look this stuff up in non biased, non conservative sources?
They all look like goofy 'talking point' questions to which you think you have the answers, but you really dont.

For example, question #3 just shows absolute ignorance about the problem, and if you can't understand why, your abject cranial emptiness can not be filled in a forum like this.
 






Why dont you look this stuff up in non biased, non conservative sources?
They all look like goofy 'talking point' questions to which you think you have the answers, but you really dont.

For example, question #3 just shows absolute ignorance about the problem, and if you can't understand why, your abject cranial emptiness can not be filled in a forum like this.

Thanks for making an absolute fool of yourself. You are the very epitome of the term "useful idiot"!
 






Why dont you look this stuff up in non biased, non conservative sources?
They all look like goofy 'talking point' questions to which you think you have the answers, but you really dont.

For example, question #3 just shows absolute ignorance about the problem, and if you can't understand why, your abject cranial emptiness can not be filled in a forum like this.


Well, I would like to hear your answers since you claim to be so knowledgable on the subject. Come on puddin. Edumacate me.

Now how is question #3 showing absolute ignorance about the problem?

You and your ilk are the ones claiming that we are getting warmer. Well, that begs the question, warmer than what? What is the temperature you seek to achieve? Lets use medical examples.

If we say one is hypertensive, we know that thier BP is higher than 130/90. And we know what goal we are shooting for when we impart medical intervention.

So surely if you are asking us to give up those things that have made us prosperous and comfortable, then you must have a target we can all shoot for.

Right?

Seems like a pretty straightforward question, unless of course you are a complete dupe and can't answer it.

I presume you fall into the latter category.