Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm249025.htm
well, this is quite a mixed message
well, this is quite a mixed message
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm249025.htm
well, this is quite a mixed message
Not really. They are saying KV had no business threatening pharmacies with what what the FDA may or may not do. And what's more, because KV was so presumptious, they've forced the FDA's hand into publicly declaring they WON'T take enforrcement action against the pharmacies!
Whoever came up with that strategy at KV has cost the company hundereds of millions of lost Makena dollars and should be shot (publicly)!
But if the agency granted the rights to a substance , wouldnt they go with what they granted , vs a possibly non compliant drug?
But if the agency granted the rights to a substance , wouldnt they go with what they granted , vs a possibly non compliant drug?
Not really. They are saying KV had no business threatening pharmacies with what what the FDA may or may not do. And what's more, because KV was so presumptious, they've forced the FDA's hand into publicly declaring they WON'T take enforrcement action against the pharmacies!
Whoever came up with that strategy at KV has cost the company hundereds of millions of lost Makena dollars and should be shot (publicly)!
So far, this is looking like a disaster.