Fast and Furious Update

[Rocknwolf]

Seems that the investigations are getting closer to bush and his corrupt attorneys general. No wonder ole' Darrell Issa has slowed down and toned down his loud mouth conservatard rhetoric.
But the bigger question remains unanswered. why were gun dealers permitted to sell the military and combat grade weapons in the first place?
Now you will have mental dwarfs and midgets cry and carry on about the second amendment, but really, 1400 weapons, including AK 47 and modifications, assault weapons of various calibers, machine guns, and ammo for same.
Why didn't the witch governor of Arizona use her powers to curtail the dealers? Gun dealers need both state and federal licenses, and the state is responsible for monitoring the retail activity of stores.
The real reason is that the more information that comes out, the more ties to the idiot bush and gonzales, as well as corruption at the state level.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/u...by-democrats-clears-obama-administration.html

 

[Bubble Burster]

Seems that the investigations are getting closer to bush and his corrupt attorneys general. No wonder ole' Darrell Issa has slowed down and toned down his loud mouth conservatard rhetoric.
But the bigger question remains unanswered. why were gun dealers permitted to sell the military and combat grade weapons in the first place?
Now you will have mental dwarfs and midgets cry and carry on about the second amendment, but really, 1400 weapons, including AK 47 and modifications, assault weapons of various calibers, machine guns, and ammo for same.
Why didn't the witch governor of Arizona use her powers to curtail the dealers? Gun dealers need both state and federal licenses, and the state is responsible for monitoring the retail activity of stores.
The real reason is that the more information that comes out, the more ties to the idiot bush and gonzales, as well as corruption at the state level.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/u...by-democrats-clears-obama-administration.html

"Who, me? Gullible? Would you like a nice cup of my Kool-Aid"?

 

[Setracsed]

Seems that the investigations are getting closer to bush and his corrupt attorneys general. No wonder ole' Darrell Issa has slowed down and toned down his loud mouth conservatard rhetoric.
But the bigger question remains unanswered. why were gun dealers permitted to sell the military and combat grade weapons in the first place?
Now you will have mental dwarfs and midgets cry and carry on about the second amendment, but really, 1400 weapons, including AK 47 and modifications, assault weapons of various calibers, machine guns, and ammo for same.
Why didn't the witch governor of Arizona use her powers to curtail the dealers? Gun dealers need both state and federal licenses, and the state is responsible for monitoring the retail activity of stores.
The real reason is that the more information that comes out, the more ties to the idiot bush and gonzales, as well as corruption at the state level.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/u...by-democrats-clears-obama-administration.html

interesting. now that you mention it, Issa has put the proverbial brakes on the
daily rhetoric about this issue. I remember reading something in the news daily about a republican complaining about this, now you hear nary a peep. Funny how these things go.

 

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

Seems that the investigations are getting closer to bush and his corrupt attorneys general. No wonder ole' Darrell Issa has slowed down and toned down his loud mouth conservatard rhetoric.
But the bigger question remains unanswered. why were gun dealers permitted to sell the military and combat grade weapons in the first place?
Now you will have mental dwarfs and midgets cry and carry on about the second amendment, but really, 1400 weapons, including AK 47 and modifications, assault weapons of various calibers, machine guns, and ammo for same.
Why didn't the witch governor of Arizona use her powers to curtail the dealers? Gun dealers need both state and federal licenses, and the state is responsible for monitoring the retail activity of stores.
The real reason is that the more information that comes out, the more ties to the idiot bush and gonzales, as well as corruption at the state level.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/u...by-democrats-clears-obama-administration.html

"...Fast and Furious, which ran from late 2009 to early 2011,..." Remind me...Who was president over that time?

And, you ask why didn't Governor Brewer not prohibit legal gun sales? She's not a Nazi, maybe?

Even if Governor Brewer had known about Obama's gunrunning program and wanted to curtail the legal sales, Obama likely would have filed suit against her for interfering with the incompetence of his administration. He has a penchant for such acts.

 

[Setracsed]

"...Fast and Furious, which ran from late 2009 to early 2011,..." Remind me...Who was president over that time?

And, you ask why didn't Governor Brewer not prohibit legal gun sales? She's not a Nazi, maybe?

Even if Governor Brewer had known about Obama's gunrunning program and wanted to curtail the legal sales, Obama likely would have filed suit against her for interfering with the incompetence of his administration. He has a penchant for such acts.

I think an article has a beginning and an ending so that the reader knows to read everything in between to accurately ascertain the message within. You apparently are not willing to do this.

 

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

I think an article has a beginning and an ending so that the reader knows to read everything in between to accurately ascertain the message within. You apparently are not willing to do this.

You mean the Democratic Message? Got it.

 

[Setracsed]

You mean the Democratic Message? Got it.

Well, "the Democratic Message" was good enough for you to post the quote you did, right?

Again, another fine example of seeing only what you want when other facts are staring you in the face.

 

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

Well, "the Democratic Message" was good enough for you to post the quote you did, right?

Again, another fine example of seeing only what you want when other facts are staring you in the face.

A quote, non-the-less that you would prefer to ignore. What's with you on that. You're not too friendly with facts.

 

[Setracsed]

A quote, non-the-less that you would prefer to ignore. What's with you on that. You're not too friendly with facts.

Point is, you claim that the "Democratic Message" isn't worthy of quoting, yet you quote it when it seemingly agreed with your narrow viewpoint. How does your mind hold on to and process such diametrically opposed viewpoints? Fascinating. If one part is tainted by the "Democratic Message" shouldn't the entire article be unworthy of you quoting it?

Another fine example of you seeing only what you want to see.

 

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

Point is, you claim that the "Democratic Message" isn't worthy of quoting, yet you quote it when it seemingly agreed with your narrow viewpoint. How does your mind hold on to and process such diametrically opposed viewpoints? Fascinating. If one part is tainted by the "Democratic Message" shouldn't the entire article be unworthy of you quoting it?

Another fine example of you seeing only what you want to see.

So, the dates of the program were "viewpoints"?? How do you come up with these? You're pretty funny.

 

[Setracsed]

So, the dates of the program were "viewpoints"?? How do you come up with these? You're pretty funny.

now now, don't run from your convictions. If you consider an outlet to be simply a "Democratic Message", you should stick by your beliefs. So then, why do you believe one part of it, let's go with "dates", but failed to see that there are other "dates" in the article that show that the program goes all the way back to the Bush administration? Your convictions are pretty weak if you ask me.

You're pretty funny.

 

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

now now, don't run from your convictions. If you consider an outlet to be simply a "Democratic Message", you should stick by your beliefs. So then, why do you believe one part of it, let's go with "dates", but failed to see that there are other "dates" in the article that show that the program goes all the way back to the Bush administration? Your convictions are pretty weak if you ask me.

You're pretty funny.

Ha! You're a spinning idiot.

 

[Setracsed]

Ha! You're a spinning idiot.

No, I'm sticking by my original post concerning you. But, feel free to point out the spin, please. I simply answered your question regarding dates and viewpoints.

You're funny.

 

[Doc Who]

No, I'm sticking by my original post concerning you. But, feel free to point out the spin, please. I simply answered your question regarding dates and viewpoints.

You're funny.

She wears too much lipstick.