Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
It seems like oncology doesn't want outsiders...?
I don't think it's outsiders but Pegasys reps are considered bottom of the barrel in my opinion. Not saying its actually true but i think thats the perception. Pegasys is a primary care sales force, with pre approved messages, call metrics, and non-sales nonsense. Pegasys reps have little total account calling experience do to their lack of reimbursement knowledge. Primary care will have difficulty getting into Bio-Onc. Also i hate to say it but it's Roche folk are not considered strong players. They lack creativity in the field due to big pharma personality. I see it all the time.
I don't think it's outsiders but Pegasys reps are considered bottom of the barrel in my opinion. Not saying its actually true but i think thats the perception. Pegasys is a primary care sales force, with pre approved messages, call metrics, and non-sales nonsense. Pegasys reps have little total account calling experience do to their lack of reimbursement knowledge. Primary care will have difficulty getting into Bio-Onc. Also i hate to say it but it's Roche folk are not considered strong players. They lack creativity in the field due to big pharma personality. I see it all the time.
Ok this is my first post in this thread. I have worked in both BioOnc and Pegasys. To the original poster yes you can get a job in BioOnc if you are qualified and present yourself as the best candidate. There are now close to 20 former Pegasys reps in BioOnc across many different franchises. Anyone interested in BioOnc needs to understand buy and bill, total office calls (there are many more layers in oncology than in Pegasys), working in a large team environment (6-8 BioOnc reps can all call on the same account) and finally the drugs. Learning not only Genentech's drugs but all the competition (which there are lot more players) and yes there is competition.
To the BioOnc person who replied there are many talented people in Pegasys but there are also a lot of bad eggs, just like in BioOnc. To educate you Pegasys in not a primary care sale. First and foremost Pegasys is interferon, which has been widely used buy oncologists. Pegasys in combination with the current oral regimens has a very complex side effect profile, as complex as any in oncology. Pegasys reps have to continually educate and handhold Gastroenterologists (who do not want to treat HCV), their nurses and office staff. The billing side is complicated due to multiple combinations and payers, it is NOT as complicated as buy and bill. Also many Pegasys reps dealt with very large complicated accounts like state and federal prison systems, VA Hospitals and state health organizations.
There is a reason all companies hire people with direct experience in the market. It is an easier transition and you bring in relationships. If a BioOnc rep started in Pegasys they would struggle at first, same as the Pegasys rep would in Oncology. Many other franchises in Genentech struggle to get over to BioOnc for whatever reason. If you want a job in a new franchise, EARN IT. It can and has been done by a lot of other people.
Of course they can. Moved over to BioOnc a year ago and it is as primary care as any Pharma job out there. If you were successful in another franchise and are a good caterer you will do fine.
And yes many of the Gene BioOnc reps (or COS as they like to be called) are as arrogant as they come but no worries they are just drug reps like the Pegasus team.
I don't think it's outsiders but Pegasys reps are considered bottom of the barrel in my opinion. Not saying its actually true but i think thats the perception. Pegasys is a primary care sales force, with pre approved messages, call metrics, and non-sales nonsense. Pegasys reps have little total account calling experience do to their lack of reimbursement knowledge. Primary care will have difficulty getting into Bio-Onc. Also i hate to say it but it's Roche folk are not considered strong players. They lack creativity in the field due to big pharma personality. I see it all the time.
What it really sounds like is someone is just trying to stir up trouble...
If both jobs were at the ‘same level’ then why do so many Peg reps want to break into oncology and no onc reps want to break into hep?
I did it and I can tell you from experience that Onc is 100% harder to grasp then Hep. In hep if you know GI and the Liver you know basically all you need to know. In oncology you are expected to know your tumor type inside and out, all of your competitors inside and out, all of the other treatment modalities(rad onc, surgery, cryo, diagnostics, etc.), and since the drugs are so toxic to some many body systems and organs you need to have a greater understanding of many of those organs and systems, AND this is the big one, a general understanding of EVERY OTHER cancer, solid and liquid , out there – just the terminology can be mind blowing. My first year on the job and oncologists would start drawing comparisons to CRC from how they treated CML, or liver cancer, or myeloma. Which I knew nothing about nor was ever trained on. Not that people can’t grasp the concepts it just takes a heck of a lot more time then understanding Hepatitis/Virology.
Also to the previous poster’s point access is dismal and hence why we and other oncology companies hire tenured reps as generally they are the ones with good access. A new oncology rep is more or less screwed for the first year.
OK, lets just keep it real, oncology reps are NOT "higher", thats just a fact, simply ask your HR rep. Oncology does however offer the more opportunities. Simply put, I had a discussion with the head of training and development at Genentech and she literally told me that with 6 months of training, any good rep can become a more than proficient BioOnc rep. She did not hesitate at all when she said this. In fact, I know of reps that went from derm to Oncology, primary care to oncology, HCV to oncology, and the list goes on and on.
Ask yourself this, how many reps have you seen from another area, transfer to BioOnc, and could not learn the material, etc. I know of none, and am sure that it is no different than BioOnc reps who have transferred to other areas. We in BioOnc sometimes get a little confused and think that we are "oncoloGISTS" and not "Oncology REPS.
We are 95% the same as all other reps, including primary care, the difference being we are trained on different products; and we have much greater access issues. An HCV manager would much sooner higher and HCV rep, for an open position, vs. an oncology rep; this does not mean that HCV is higher.
Lose the ego, and move on, you are simply a drug rep who is trained in a different area. You cater lunches, and give 30 second sound bites just like everyone else, AND we have it worse, as our access is much worse, and we trip all over one another as multiple Genentech BioOnc reps all attempting to call on the same accounts. YOU ARE NOT A DOCTOR, SO STOP ACTING AS YOU ARE!