Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
What is the usual rate for a commission only 1099 position through a distributor? I have only worked for direct sales companies. I've heard as high as 50% but I think around 25% is the norm.
What is the usual rate for a commission only 1099 position through a distributor? I have only worked for direct sales companies. I've heard as high as 50% but I think around 25% is the norm.
What is the usual rate for a commission only 1099 position through a distributor? I have only worked for direct sales companies. I've heard as high as 50% but I think around 25% is the norm.
Why would you go to jail for selling pain creams. Stupid comment!!
25% - 35% is the norm. I pay a 35% recurring commission for disposables.
It's not stupid. I can think of three reasons:
1. Paying the prescribing physician a portion of the commissions under the table (criminal and civil violation of the anti-kickback statute);
2. Paying the prescribing physician to enroll the patient in an "outcomes study" (criminal and civil violation of the anti-kickback statute); or,
3. The rep is getting paid commissions on a 1099 basis, and the patient being provided the pain cream is insured through a federally funded program, such as Tricare or Medicaid (criminal and civil violation of the anti-kickback statute; and, fee splitting between the pharmacy and the sales rep).
Reason #3 is probably the least understood and the most common. The 1099 rep is being paid a percentage of government dollars reimbursed the pharmacy, based solely upon the value and/or volume of services rendered.
You are wrong on #3. Every large Ortho company pays their distributors 1099. As long as your company meets all other safe harbors you are fine. Spend some $$ and consult a top healthcare attorney, I did.
25% - 35% is the norm. I pay a 35% recurring commission for disposables.
It's not stupid. I can think of three reasons:
1. Paying the prescribing physician a portion of the commissions under the table (criminal and civil violation of the anti-kickback statute);
2. Paying the prescribing physician to enroll the patient in an "outcomes study" (criminal and civil violation of the anti-kickback statute); or,
3. The rep is getting paid commissions on a 1099 basis, and the patient being provided the pain cream is insured through a federally funded program, such as Tricare or Medicaid (criminal and civil violation of the anti-kickback statute; and, fee splitting between the pharmacy and the sales rep).
Reason #3 is probably the least understood and the most common. The 1099 rep is being paid a percentage of government dollars reimbursed the pharmacy, based solely upon the value and/or volume of services rendered.
I am not wrong on #3.
It is legally kosher for the ortho company to pay their distributor commissions on a 1099 basis. This is because the distributor is not billing a federally funded health insurance program. The distributor is selling their devices to the physician or hospital, and in turn, the physician or hospital is billing for the ortho device.
Now, compare and contrast that to the pharmacy that is billing a federally funded health insurance program, then splitting a portion of the amount reimbursed with the 1099 ISR sales rep.
Nevertheless, I agree with your suggestion: "Spend some $$ and consult a top healthcare attorney, I did."
You may want to read the following, from a well known attorney who specializes in healthcare law:
http://www.medtrade.com/news/genera...utm_term=8333315&utm_content=#sthash.trC0Usmx
Here is the take-away:
"The Medicare anti-kickback statute prohibits offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving any remuneration in exchange for referring (or arranging for the referral of) a patient to a person or entity for any Medicare-covered item or service or in exchange for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering any Medicare-covered item or service."
Although this article is focused on DME suppliers who bill federally funded programs, substitute a DME supplier for a pain cream pharmacy that pays commissions on a 1099 basis to an ISR. The commissions paid the 1099 ISR are a portion of the amount reimbursed by a federally funded health insurance program.
the following text from the article should now be read in context, again, substituting "pain cream pharmacy" for a "DME supplier":
"And so while it is permissible for a DME supplier to pay commissions to a bona fide employee who generates business to the supplier (in which the payer is a government program), it is a violation of the kickback statute if the supplier pays commissions to a 1099 independent contractor who generates business to the supplier (in which the payer is a government program).
The anti-kickback statute cuts both ways: the payer of the money (the DME supplier) and the recipient of the money (the 1099 independent contractor) are both liable under the statute, which is a criminal statute. "
The pain cream pharmacy that pays a 1099 ISR commissions, based upon a percentage of the amount reimbursed by a "government program," is as illegal as the day is long. Both the pharmacy and the 1099 ISR are vulnerable. Think about commissions being paid the 1099 ISR, for the referral of a Tricare or Medicaid insured patient to the pain cream pharmacy.
Really, you linked to a paid advertisement by an attorney with his contact info so he can get business from his "expert" opinion. Dude, you are just plain wrong. One obscure attorney opinion in hillbilly Texas does not make it factual. As I said, as long as you meet all safe harbors you are fine. And I am basing this off the opinion of one of the top healthcare attorneys/practices in N.Y.C. and a 2nd opinion from a practice in Boston. Think I will trust my guys.