Demalquedacrat beatdown



















What was worse, the Scott Brown win, or this one for the Libtards?

In an area that is democrap by a 3:1 ratio, what does it say that a republican won Wiener's old seat?

It says that Obama is going down and has taken the Dimocrat party with him!

This is a ANOTHER clear signal that people are tired of the Dims and their destructive, heavy-handed policies.
 












I'm still not saying whether I'd rather have Obama in the WH w/ a Repulican Congress (like the Clinton era) or one of the Republicans that's in the running but make no mistake boys and girls, this is huge and the Republican party now clearly has the momentum. What's interesting is how much this is getting like the last election - which was more of a rebuke of Bush than anything else. Now we have a rebuke of Obama.

Rebuke, rebuke, it sure would be nice to be voting for someone instead of against someone.
 












I'm still not saying whether I'd rather have Obama in the WH w/ a Repulican Congress (like the Clinton era) or one of the Republicans that's in the running but make no mistake boys and girls, this is huge and the Republican party now clearly has the momentum. What's interesting is how much this is getting like the last election - which was more of a rebuke of Bush than anything else. Now we have a rebuke of Obama.

Rebuke, rebuke, it sure would be nice to be voting for someone instead of against someone.

In an ideal world, you have a balance of power between the parties. But obama is not the right person. His approach and tactics the first two years cemented the relationship with republicans and the man has no idea how to work 'with' other people. He should leave the country and be a dictator since that would suit him much better.

You've hit on the key issue - obama's election was a rebuke of Bush. It was NOT, as obama and party thought, an endorsement of extreme left and socialistic policies for the nation.

Gay "marriage", the mosque by the WTC, and relationships with Israel also played into this vote.
 












Gay marriage, the mosque, medimar & abortion all had their beginnings before Obama. I had a Medimar card while Bushwhacker was in office. The whole issue (IMHO) centers around his thinking that 'printing money' will get us anywhere and out of the whole. He had some good ideas, he had spome terrible ones. I never gloated when he became president although I was thrilled to see the Bush gang go and the lying team of McPalin lose. I will be equally pleased to see him out.

My focus now is on getting the best replacement - either a sensible Dem or a Republican that doesn't want to be an emporer like Bush did. I don't see anything constructive in bashing the last 2 losers anymore, let's see some constructive thinking on a suitable replacement. This pendulum swing back and forth makes each party's gfans feel good for 4 years but all it is is taking 3 steps fporward, 2 steps back - ad infinitum.

Anyway, I now officially predict that Jobama is out not matter how it happens.....

I think a dem contender would have a real chance but it will never happen.
 










































That's why most of us have her on ignore. She's just like a little puppy that humps your leg, yaps, then piddles on the floor.

You are too funny to ignore - Reading your posts is like slowing down to see a car fire on the side of the road.

Now, run along and finish putting your make-up on.
 


















Almost on cue, the reality challenged MFAS proves my point from Post #18 - Most of the cons here have quite a circle jerk going and it is a riot to watch them fumble and stumble like a drunk holding onto a street pole.