Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Just some thoughts on the eve of our downsizing...
Anyone find irony in ZS consultants (as well as others) being brought into all the pharma companies to "right size" sales forces back to the days when territories had one or two reps per territory representing multiple products? I do recall it was these very same companies 15 or so years ago selling pharma on the "larger share of voice" model that began the massive escalation in pharma rep numbers. Just think about how ridiculous it sounds today to have 4 to 6 reps per product...seeing the same doctor everyday...touting the same message...doing the same brand team close. Granted, most of Pharma bought into it and hired more reps to shout down the competition, and it worked for a decade or so. What's really amazing is that so many offices and physicians tolerated this model for so long.
Anyway, it just seems these consulting companies are selling pharma the sales rep staffing model that existed 20 years ago...
Anyone find irony in ZS consultants (as well as others) being brought into all the pharma companies to "right size" sales forces back to the days when territories had one or two reps per territory representing multiple products? I do recall it was these very same companies 15 or so years ago selling pharma on the "larger share of voice" model that began the massive escalation in pharma rep numbers. Just think about how ridiculous it sounds today to have 4 to 6 reps per product...seeing the same doctor everyday...touting the same message...doing the same brand team close. Granted, most of Pharma bought into it and hired more reps to shout down the competition, and it worked for a decade or so. What's really amazing is that so many offices and physicians tolerated this model for so long.
Anyway, it just seems these consulting companies are selling pharma the sales rep staffing model that existed 20 years ago...