Brazillian Floods Must Be Worse Than Reported

Quote
ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

Active Member
The region already has seen the largest rainfall since 1967, according to the government’s Inmet meteorology agency.

Well, the Libtards teach us that thermometers were under-developed 35 years ago when temperatures were indicating a coming ICE AGE (Brrrrrrrr). They said 35 year old weather data is just irrelevant. Therefore, the Brazilians surely were incapable of measuring rainfall 44 years ago. Hence, according to our resident libtards, this must really be the worst rainfall since the beginning of the Universe.

Cold fronts tend to be stationed above Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro for longer periods of time because of the (Drum roll please) ====>>>> La Nina <<<<==== meteorological event, he [Marco Antonio dos Santos, a meteorologist for Somar Meteorologia] said.

What???? Officials say this flooding is caused by La Nina?? No mention of Man-made Climate Change???

What is a libtard supposed to think??




http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...as-rio-declares-official-mourning-period.html
 












4DView said:
The region already has seen the largest rainfall since 1967, according to the government’s Inmet meteorology agency.

Well, the Libtards teach us that thermometers were under-developed 35 years ago when temperatures were indicating a coming ICE AGE (Brrrrrrrr). They said 35 year old weather data is just irrelevant. Therefore, the Brazilians surely were incapable of measuring rainfall 44 years ago. Hence, according to our resident libtards, this must really be the worst rainfall since the beginning of the Universe.

Cold fronts tend to be stationed above Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro for longer periods of time because of the (Drum roll please) ====>>>> La Nina <<<<==== meteorological event, he [Marco Antonio dos Santos, a meteorologist for Somar Meteorologia] said.

What???? Officials say this flooding is caused by La Nina?? No mention of Man-made Climate Change???

What is a libtard supposed to think??




http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...as-rio-declares-official-mourning-period.html
Click to expand...

THERE it is.

It is always cute when Libtards accuse conservatives of not relying on science. Nothing could be further from the truth, at least in my case.

The scientific models cannnot account for:

1. Cloud formation
2. La Nina
3. El Nino
4. The Jetstream
5. The Sun
6. When volcanoes erupt
7. Massive forest / brush from lightening storms

Already, we have 7 MAJOR variables which so-called science is settled climate models cannot account for. Add this into shitty data being input into the models coming from disparate sources, and even being selectively biased, along with data smoothing, data reduction, etc. and basically you have jack shit.

Garbage in, garbage out.

It is the Libtards who lack ANY critical thinking / scientific training to even have a shred of understanding of why this is such a hoax.

Oh, and here is just 1 or 2 scientists who disagree with the global warming fraud.

http://petitionproject.org/

Because the libtards don't want to kill their own deeply held, emotionally driven beliefs, here is what the above link leads to:

31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs

Yep. The science is settled alright.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

And libtards, if you STILL doubt me, show me ONE ARTICLE / PAPER from your Climate Priests that showed that we would have no warming increase since 1998? Even the lead scientists on the IPCC are "disappointed" that they couldn't account for this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fCP_nHRjP8&feature=related
 
Last edited by a moderator:












This is pretty funny that libtards, with their silence, acknowledge how baseless their whole AGW ruse has proven to be. 63 views, and the best the libtards can do is just hope the evidence of their folly just goes away.
 












4DView said:
This is pretty funny that libtards, with their silence, acknowledge how baseless their whole AGW ruse has proven to be. 63 views, and the best the libtards can do is just hope the evidence of their folly just goes away.
Click to expand...

Or wait until another "Warmest 250 years since records began" article from the New York Times.

:rolleyes:
 






DING, DING, DING....Over 100 views now, and not a single comment by the AGW drones.

Imagine, the worst natural disaster in Brazil (libtards teach us we can't believe 1967 data) and the meteorological AUTHORITIES give NO credit to AGW. Go figure.
 












This is a very telling experience. Over 125 Views, 700+ dead, thousands homeless, and no mention of AGW and no expression of concern by the libtards.

Message: If the libards can't use you for advancement of their AGW ruse, you are shit out of luck. Swim for your natural disaster life...by your unbelieving self.
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote