Boston MFM trial

Anonymous

Guest
How are things going? Seriously, your lab reported out fetal fraction on two non pregnant women!

Outstanding!!!!!

Good luck spinning that into "we should be diagnostic"
 


















Not Natera, that test also showed fetal fraction in non pregnant women. True, they did not make a call like you morons did, but they still found fetal DNA in non pregnant women.

You guys are all screwed.

How do you remember to breathe moron?


When you use a test outside of it's intended patient population don't be surprised when you get erroneous results. For instance if you took an IQ test and it might determine that you're a savant .... an Idiot Savant but still a savant!
 






How do you remember to breathe moron?


When you use a test outside of it's intended patient population don't be surprised when you get erroneous results. For instance if you took an IQ test and it might determine that you're a savant .... an Idiot Savant but still a savant!

Amy Shea was behind all this. True post!
 


















Amy is a customer service champion who owns her performance and adds value at every turn.

You, on the other hand, are a total nobody.

Hope this helps.

Yes she is and yes she does...just ask Mike Vacari! Every time she gets her turn she performs well! Me, on the other hand...no thanks I am good.
 






Yes she is and yes she does...just ask Mike Vacari! Every time she gets her turn she performs well! Me, on the other hand...no thanks I am good.

You sure talk big on an anonymous website, junior. No wonder your wife craves the bbc and you're relegated to hiding under the bed when Tyrone shows up.
 












Actual scientist here.

Assuming the results were verified by an independent laboratory, I can think of a few possible explanations why/how fetal DNA might be found in a "non-pregnant "person, just off the top of my head. I.e:
-Teratoma
- cancer, other (tumor metastasis=Can also be thought of as Differentiated cells taking on stem cell properties again, abberently)
- microchimerism
-vaccines?
etc

Quite interesting, really!
The sorts of unexpected weirdness that we researchers live for. :)
It happens! You'd be surprised...
 






Actual scientist here.

Assuming the results were verified by an independent laboratory, I can think of a few possible explanations why/how fetal DNA might be found in a "non-pregnant "person, just off the top of my head. I.e:
-Teratoma
- cancer, other (tumor metastasis=Can also be thought of as Differentiated cells taking on stem cell properties again, abberently)
- microchimerism
-vaccines?
etc

Quite interesting, really!
The sorts of unexpected weirdness that we researchers live for. :)
It happens! You'd be surprised...

"Actual scientist here" ... oh, brother

Next time do a better job of chopping a copy/paste job and actually list a real credential or two, and people might take you seriously. Including your flabby wife.
 






Not a scientist, but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

I would accept "actual scientists" explanation if it were isolated to one lab and one lab only. The problem is, it was not just one lab that blew the results, the testing was done over two different months, and the only labs that blew the results all used the same MPSS technology.

The MPSS technology is flawed.
 






"Actual scientist here" ... oh, brother

Next time do a better job of chopping a copy/paste job and actually list a real credential or two, and people might take you seriously. Including your flabby wife.

Scientist please go find you own board. This thread was about Amy sucking mike's dick so please allow us to continue to have entertainment.