Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Bonus and Evaluations Ratings = Garbage IN Garbage OUT
The major flaw with PDI’s bonus and new evaluation system that is based 70% on sales performance is that the basic sales data entered to compute these things are majorly flawed. I can think of a dozen times I just missed bonus or did not make as much sales bonus because I was evaluated on doctors who were not in my territory. There is a major disconnect between Sales Management, IMS, Veeva and Incentials.
I have spoken to several representatives who did not make any money on fast start contests because PDI did not bother removing doctors that have died, moved or retired before they calculated results.
There have been several occasions when I reviewed an Incentials report and it said you did not see the required % of doctors to make bonus or your bonus was reduced because you did not see the optimum % of doctors so you are getting a reduced bonus.
The problem as I see it is , even though the sales representatives delete these doctors through propper channels on Veeva they never get removed by the Incentials people and therefore many times you get jack squat in fast start contests or receive less bonus in other IC programs.
You can’t have a fair bonus system or evaluation system based on growth and performance if you are including doctors not in a representative’s territory and holding them accountable for it.
I am tired of hearing "it is what it" is from my last few district managers. Any fellow reps out there please comment.
The major flaw with PDI’s bonus and new evaluation system that is based 70% on sales performance is that the basic sales data entered to compute these things are majorly flawed. I can think of a dozen times I just missed bonus or did not make as much sales bonus because I was evaluated on doctors who were not in my territory. There is a major disconnect between Sales Management, IMS, Veeva and Incentials.
I have spoken to several representatives who did not make any money on fast start contests because PDI did not bother removing doctors that have died, moved or retired before they calculated results.
There have been several occasions when I reviewed an Incentials report and it said you did not see the required % of doctors to make bonus or your bonus was reduced because you did not see the optimum % of doctors so you are getting a reduced bonus.
The problem as I see it is , even though the sales representatives delete these doctors through propper channels on Veeva they never get removed by the Incentials people and therefore many times you get jack squat in fast start contests or receive less bonus in other IC programs.
You can’t have a fair bonus system or evaluation system based on growth and performance if you are including doctors not in a representative’s territory and holding them accountable for it.
I am tired of hearing "it is what it" is from my last few district managers. Any fellow reps out there please comment.