Bill O'Oily's new book on Trump

[Vagitarian]

Just bought it - O'Oily is annoying but as interesting on the right as Maher is on the left and here's his comments on ze book:

“This fact-based account of a sitting president, in our lifetime, as history unfolds, will bring backlash. My book’s neither pro nor con. Every word true. I sent it to him and will probably hear from him at his usual 2 a.m.”

 

[SnarkyCon]

I'm thinking about getting it, but just got Dan Bongino's book...

 

[Vagitarian]

I'm thinking about getting it, but just got Dan Bongino's book...

Got through 6 chapters yesterday - damned good book. It's actually a very good read and whether you like Trump or not, he is president and the book offers some important insight into what makes him tick. He describes public's general feelings on Trump as ranging from loathing to adulation. I don't fall into either those 2 categories. I have a very good friend whose company worked with Trump on designing and building casino projects years ago. While he would vote for him again, when I asked about his impression of the man, he described him to me as 'a good businessman but very difficult to like'. O'Oily's book makes a similar point. Trump is a man with very few friends. But he got elected.

 

[anonymous]

Got through 6 chapters yesterday - damned good book. It's actually a very good read and whether you like Trump or not, he is president and the book offers some important insight into what makes him tick. He describes public's general feelings on Trump as ranging from loathing to adulation. I don't fall into either those 2 categories. I have a very good friend whose company worked with Trump on designing and building casino projects years ago. While he would vote for him again, when I asked about his impression of the man, he described him to me as 'a good businessman but very difficult to like'. O'Oily's book makes a similar point. Trump is a man with very few friends. But he got elected.

I like 0’Reilly and have no problem with him writing a book on Trump, and while he may have sources, it’s not like he’s close to Trump. He’s merely observed him for several decades from a considerable distance.

The fact that he has very few friends is neither here nor there. He works a lot and is very involved with his family.

What is important is that he’s a good businessman and that’s been substantiated in the great way he’s managed the economy.

 

[Vagitarian]

I like 0’Reilly and have no problem with him writing a book on Trump, and while he may have sources, it’s not like he’s close to Trump. He’s merely observed him for several decades from a considerable distance.

The fact that he has very few friends is neither here nor there. He works a lot and is very involved with his family.

What is important is that he’s a good businessman and that’s been substantiated in the great way he’s managed the economy.

Considerable distance? You throw out stuff like that without even doing your homework. Much of the book involved a personal interview on Air Force One. Then that interview was woven into his observations so you are half correct which is more than you usually are.

 

[anonymous]

Considerable distance? You throw out stuff like that without even doing your homework. Much of the book involved a personal interview on Air Force One. Then that interview was woven into his observations so you are half correct which is more than you usually are.

LOL! One interview hardly makes him a Trump expert or confidant. As usual, I’m completely right and you make an absolute fool of yourself.

 

[anonymous]

Hey Bill O'Riley isn't he the guy who got fired for sexual harnessing all those women, like anybody cares what he has to say about anything, just another freak.

 

[anonymous]

Hey Bill O'Riley isn't he the guy who got fired for sexual harnessing all those women, like anybody cares what he has to say about anything, just another freak.

Nobody knows tis loner president freak - that was O'Reilly's point - I read the whole thing in 2 days. Interesting read.

 

[anonymous]

Considerable distance? You throw out stuff like that without even doing your homework. Much of the book involved a personal interview on Air Force One. Then that interview was woven into his observations so you are half correct which is more than you usually are.

Wow, you like reading a actual book, shoot the way you talk most of the time I thought you would be reading hustler or karma sutra.

 

[anonymous]

Hey Bill O'Riley isn't he the guy who got fired for sexual harnessing all those women, like anybody cares what he has to say about anything, just another freak.

If that’s your standard then nobody cares what Bill Clinton has to say and it’s a good thing we kept him out of the White House by electing Trump over Hitlery.

 

[anonymous]

If that’s your standard then nobody cares what Bill Clinton has to say and it’s a good thing we kept him out of the White House by electing Trump over Hitlery.

Can't sexual harass or assault the willing. There's a difference between a philanderer and a sexual predator but I would not expect someone like you to know difference.

 

[anonymous]

Can't sexual harass or assault the willing. There's a difference between a philanderer and a sexual predator but I would not expect someone like you to know difference.

Idiot! Clinton payed out almost a million to someone who wasn’t willing! He’s also been credibly accused of rape.

You don’t know anything!

 

[Vagitarian]

Can't sexual harass or assault the willing. There's a difference between a philanderer and a sexual predator but I would not expect someone like you to know difference.

Bingo - the women flocked to Bill and fawned over him - all the while hoping - then later when their fairy tale dreams didn't come true? Sour grapes - big time sour grapes.

 

[anonymous]

Bingo - the women flocked to Bill and fawned over him - all the while hoping - then later when their fairy tale dreams didn't come true? Sour grapes - big time sour grapes.

See most people are not honest about what they really want, but if they are sooner or later they meet someone that will be cool with it. Most people if they know from the jump that they should not have expectations with the situation than no one gets hurt. But a usual most people just lie to others to get what they want out of them and that is where all the gun play comes in.

 

[anonymous]

Bingo - the women flocked to Bill and fawned over him - all the while hoping - then later when their fairy tale dreams didn't come true? Sour grapes - big time sour grapes.

Some did! Some didn’t!

The only fairy tale is your idiotic post!

 

[anonymous]

See most people are not honest about what they really want, but if they are sooner or later they meet someone that will be cool with it. Most people if they know from the jump that they should not have expectations with the situation than no one gets hurt. But a usual most people just lie to others to get what they want out of them and that is where all the gun play comes in.

Did Bubba get shot??????

 

[Vagitarian]

Some did! Some didn’t!

The only fairy tale is your idiotic post!

Name ONE woman who was 'supposedly' sexualized by Bill Clinton who responsibly reported the violation to law enforcement immediately after it happened - just name ONE - go!

 

[anonymous]

Name ONE woman who was 'supposedly' sexualized by Bill Clinton who responsibly reported the violation to law enforcement immediately after it happened - just name ONE - go!

LOL! Let’s get something straight right now you mysoginist little piss ant. It’s not up to you to tell a traumatized woman who’s been sexually harassed or raped what is responsible.

Second, your post drips with stench of extreme hypocrisy. The standard you just proposed in a vain attempt to shield dirty Bubba your BJ hero you chose not to employ when Kavanaugh and Moore had women who hadn’t “responsibly” gone to law enforcement immediately.

There’s one critical difference though. When Kavanaugh and Moore were accused of these sexual misdeeds, they were powerless nobodies. When Bill Clinton was accused he was the number 1 or number 2 law enforcement officer in the state! Huge difference, Idiot Boy!

Now go stick a fork in yourself cause your done! And Goofy Grin coming along to try to prop you up won’t help you!

Only God and yourself can help you!

 

[anonymous]

LOL! Let’s get something straight right now you mysoginist little piss ant. It’s not up to you to tell a traumatized woman who’s been sexually harassed or raped what is responsible.

Second, your post drips with stench of extreme hypocrisy. The standard you just proposed in a vain attempt to shield dirty Bubba your BJ hero you chose not to employ when Kavanaugh and Moore had women who hadn’t “responsibly” gone to law enforcement immediately.

There’s one critical difference though. When Kavanaugh and Moore were accused of these sexual misdeeds, they were powerless nobodies. When Bill Clinton was accused he was the number 1 or number 2 law enforcement officer in the state! Huge difference, Idiot Boy!

Now go stick a fork in yourself cause your done! And Goofy Grin coming along to try to prop you up won’t help you!

Only God and yourself can help you!

More quaking in the tall grass!

 

[Vagitarian]

LOL! Let’s get something straight right now you mysoginist little piss ant. It’s not up to you to tell a traumatized woman who’s been sexually harassed or raped what is responsible.

Second, your post drips with stench of extreme hypocrisy. The standard you just proposed in a vain attempt to shield dirty Bubba your BJ hero you chose not to employ when Kavanaugh and Moore had women who hadn’t “responsibly” gone to law enforcement immediately.

There’s one critical difference though. When Kavanaugh and Moore were accused of these sexual misdeeds, they were powerless nobodies. When Bill Clinton was accused he was the number 1 or number 2 law enforcement officer in the state! Huge difference, Idiot Boy!

Now go stick a fork in yourself cause your done! And Goofy Grin coming along to try to prop you up won’t help you!

Only God and yourself can help you!

Moore was a powerless nobody? What are you smoking?