Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
I can't help but see all the negative comments on this opportunity. Is there anyone who would consider taking the job it were offered to them?
I won't. After long consideration, the hiring strategy just does not make sense. I have worked for several start ups and when they hire this may people at launch, they ALWAYS end up laying a large percentage of them off very quickly. Once the drug launches, the company starts spending money faster than they can make it and when wall street puts on the pressure, the quickest fix is to streamline the sales force. Make no mistake, this is an orphan drug. They do not need 85 reps anyway. Truth be told, they probably know that and are just testing the waters to see how well/quickly the drug is received in areas. Anyone who has launched a drug knows that there are certain areas where the physicians tend to be "early adopters" and certain areas where they will wait to see what their colleagues do first and that it is effective and safe.
I also caution those who have kids- once they decide they need to streamline the sales force, you will be the ones with targets on your heads. Your territories will double or triple in size and your RSM knows that you will be miserable when you're forced to do 3-5 overnights a week.
I know the money is tempting, but look at it as though that $85-100k is your total comp. If you have worked for a start up you know that they always expect much higher revenues than are realistic and therefore the goals they set are not attainable, so if you're looking for that "$36k at plan" or even the much higher bonus possibilities you saw in the interview, you are dreaming. Look at some of the other start up boards here, they were promised the same and are on track to make $300 this quarter. LOL. If you look at it from that perspective, your total comp is a little below average and you will be working twice as hard as you would for any other company making that kind of money, with the very real possibility that your position will be gone in six months or less and you will be going through this all over again.
I won't. After long consideration, the hiring strategy just does not make sense. I have worked for several start ups and when they hire this may people at launch, they ALWAYS end up laying a large percentage of them off very quickly. Once the drug launches, the company starts spending money faster than they can make it and when wall street puts on the pressure, the quickest fix is to streamline the sales force. Make no mistake, this is an orphan drug. They do not need 85 reps anyway. Truth be told, they probably know that and are just testing the waters to see how well/quickly the drug is received in areas. Anyone who has launched a drug knows that there are certain areas where the physicians tend to be "early adopters" and certain areas where they will wait to see what their colleagues do first and that it is effective and safe.
I also caution those who have kids- once they decide they need to streamline the sales force, you will be the ones with targets on your heads. Your territories will double or triple in size and your RSM knows that you will be miserable when you're forced to do 3-5 overnights a week.
I know the money is tempting, but look at it as though that $85-100k is your total comp. If you have worked for a start up you know that they always expect much higher revenues than are realistic and therefore the goals they set are not attainable, so if you're looking for that "$36k at plan" or even the much higher bonus possibilities you saw in the interview, you are dreaming. Look at some of the other start up boards here, they were promised the same and are on track to make $300 this quarter. LOL. If you look at it from that perspective, your total comp is a little below average and you will be working twice as hard as you would for any other company making that kind of money, with the very real possibility that your position will be gone in six months or less and you will be going through this all over again.
I won't. After long consideration, the hiring strategy just does not make sense. I have worked for several start ups and when they hire this may people at launch, they ALWAYS end up laying a large percentage of them off very quickly. Once the drug launches, the company starts spending money faster than they can make it and when wall street puts on the pressure, the quickest fix is to streamline the sales force. Make no mistake, this is an orphan drug. They do not need 85 reps anyway. Truth be told, they probably know that and are just testing the waters to see how well/quickly the drug is received in areas. Anyone who has launched a drug knows that there are certain areas where the physicians tend to be "early adopters" and certain areas where they will wait to see what their colleagues do first and that it is effective and safe.
I also caution those who have kids- once they decide they need to streamline the sales force, you will be the ones with targets on your heads. Your territories will double or triple in size and your RSM knows that you will be miserable when you're forced to do 3-5 overnights a week.
I know the money is tempting, but look at it as though that $85-100k is your total comp. If you have worked for a start up you know that they always expect much higher revenues than are realistic and therefore the goals they set are not attainable, so if you're looking for that "$36k at plan" or even the much higher bonus possibilities you saw in the interview, you are dreaming. Look at some of the other start up boards here, they were promised the same and are on track to make $300 this quarter. LOL. If you look at it from that perspective, your total comp is a little below average and you will be working twice as hard as you would for any other company making that kind of money, with the very real possibility that your position will be gone in six months or less and you will be going through this all over again.
Great post. In my negotiations I had to reming them of this in order to get a 2 year guarantee with my 115K offer.
Food for thought...or is it water???
Great post. In my negotiations I had to reming them of this in order to get a 2 year guarantee with my 115K offer.
Food for thought...or is it water???
Great post. In my negotiations I had to reming them of this in order to get a 2 year guarantee with my 115K offer.
Food for thought...or is it water???
Great post. In my negotiations I had to reming them of this in order to get a 2 year guarantee with my 115K offer.
Food for thought...or is it water???
I sincerely doubt they gave you any sort of guarantee so please stay off this board
Any offers from the Philadelphia interviews yet?
I haven't heard back yet.