Any thoughts on the future of the B&S division?









































































Confirms my suspicions. No one knows about the Biologics & Spine division. There really isn't a Clinical Therapies division although we still use the term.

First, when we set up the B&S division on paper everyone hopped on the bandwagon. Now that we realize we can't play in the same sandbox with big pharma everyone is scrambling back to Clinical Therapies which doesn't even exist.

Funny we started a Biologics & Spine division then immediately sold off all of our spine products which Marky Mark brought over just 3 years ago from Endo. Brilliant.

Now we have no products but around 100 employees on the payroll including 14 VPs, 10 directors and 5 managers. I thought the tip of the org chart is supposed to be pointing up.
 












Confirms my suspicions. No one knows about the Biologics & Spine division. There really isn't a Clinical Therapies division although we still use the term.

First, when we set up the B&S division on paper everyone hopped on the bandwagon. Now that we realize we can't play in the same sandbox with big pharma everyone is scrambling back to Clinical Therapies which doesn't even exist.

Funny we started a Biologics & Spine division then immediately sold off all of our spine products which Marky Mark brought over just 3 years ago from Endo. Brilliant.

Now we have no products but around 100 employees on the payroll including 14 VPs, 10 directors and 5 managers. I thought the tip of the org chart is supposed to be pointing up.


What the heck are you talking about? The clinical therapies division or BS, (whatever they are calling themselves this week) has more employees than 100.