A new era of television advertising...

Quote

anonymous

Guest
Imagine the first zepbound television commercial followed by a television commercial stating, in a roundabout way, that the drug mentioned in the previously aired commercial is the pussy-ass way of trying to lose weight, and it comes with unnecessary risks. Moreover, while the makers of that drug provide the false illusion that you are becoming stronger from their drug, the fact is you are becoming weaker.

Every time a zepbound commercial is aired, my idea for a commercial will follow. This new form of advertising (advertising the truth) will make television commercials interesting, for at least a brief moment, until you hear and/or see the same fucking commercial aired over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

I'd pay a premium to air that commercial and I'd unmute my TV.
 






anonymous said:
Imagine the first zepbound television commercial followed by a television commercial stating, in a roundabout way, that the drug mentioned in the previously aired commercial is the pussy-ass way of trying to lose weight, and it comes with unnecessary risks. Moreover, while the makers of that drug provide the false illusion that you are becoming stronger from their drug, the fact is you are becoming weaker.

Every time a zepbound commercial is aired, my idea for a commercial will follow. This new form of advertising (advertising the truth) will make television commercials interesting, for at least a brief moment, until you hear and/or see the same fucking commercial aired over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

I'd pay a premium to air that commercial and I'd unmute my TV.
Click to expand...

Cool story bro
 






anonymous said:
Imagine the first zepbound television commercial followed by a television commercial stating, in a roundabout way, that the drug mentioned in the previously aired commercial is the pussy-ass way of trying to lose weight, and it comes with unnecessary risks. Moreover, while the makers of that drug provide the false illusion that you are becoming stronger from their drug, the fact is you are becoming weaker.

Every time a zepbound commercial is aired, my idea for a commercial will follow. This new form of advertising (advertising the truth) will make television commercials interesting, for at least a brief moment, until you hear and/or see the same fucking commercial aired over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

I'd pay a premium to air that commercial and I'd unmute my TV.
Click to expand...
stfu
 






anonymous said:
Imagine the first zepbound television commercial followed by a television commercial stating, in a roundabout way, that the drug mentioned in the previously aired commercial is the pussy-ass way of trying to lose weight, and it comes with unnecessary risks. Moreover, while the makers of that drug provide the false illusion that you are becoming stronger from their drug, the fact is you are becoming weaker.

Every time a zepbound commercial is aired, my idea for a commercial will follow. This new form of advertising (advertising the truth) will make television commercials interesting, for at least a brief moment, until you hear and/or see the same fucking commercial aired over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

I'd pay a premium to air that commercial and I'd unmute my TV.
Click to expand...


Why advertise at all for Zepbound? Can’t keep up with the demand as it is
 


















anonymous said:
Why not drastically increase the amount of exercise while decreasing the amount of food you eat per day if you're serious about losing weight? Why is zepbound better than doing those things?
Click to expand...

if it was that easy, everyone would be doing it.
90 percent of people who lose weight eventually put it back on.
Willpower alone doesn’t work. Chalk it up to the evolutionary need to survive
 






anonymous said:
If it was that easy, everyone would be doing it.
90 percent of people who lose weight eventually put it back on.
Willpower alone doesn’t work. Chalk it up to the evolutionary need to survive
Click to expand...

You just contradicted yourself. You said 90% of people regain the weight and that willpower alone doesn't work. Willpower worked for at least 10% of the people in your situation. 100% of the people who stop zepbound will regain weight because they never had to use their willpower to lose it. zepbound users will never have to fight off their cravings. It's not an evolutionary need. It's a defect in the approach and with society. Something tells me that there isn't a widespread want for these drugs and you are trying to artificially create it. My record over the last several days, not including these points, is 8-2. At least one of your problems is you think you're smart, but you are not.
 






anonymous said:
You just contradicted yourself. You said 90% of people regain the weight and that willpower alone doesn't work. Willpower worked for at least 10% of the people in your situation. 100% of the people who stop zepbound will regain weight because they never had to use their willpower to lose it. zepbound users will never have to fight off their cravings. It's not an evolutionary need. It's a defect in the approach and with society. Something tells me that there isn't a widespread want for these drugs and you are trying to artificially create it. My record over the last several days, not including these points, is 8-2. At least one of your problems is you think you're smart, but you are not.
Click to expand...
These Karens are out in droves today
 






anonymous said:
You just contradicted yourself. You said 90% of people regain the weight and that willpower alone doesn't work. Willpower worked for at least 10% of the people in your situation. 100% of the people who stop zepbound will regain weight because they never had to use their willpower to lose it. zepbound users will never have to fight off their cravings. It's not an evolutionary need. It's a defect in the approach and with society. Something tells me that there isn't a widespread want for these drugs and you are trying to artificially create it. My record over the last several days, not including these points, is 8-2. At least one of your problems is you think you're smart, but you are not.
Click to expand...


Say whatever you want. It doesn’t change the fact that people are getting fatter every year.
Willpower alone doesn’t work for most obese people.
If you have a medicine that can help lower obesity related illness, so be it.
 






anonymous said:
Say whatever you want. It doesn’t change the fact that people are getting fatter every year.
Willpower alone doesn’t work for most obese people.
If you have a medicine that can help lower obesity-related illness, so be it.
Click to expand...

Why do you care about obesity-related illnesses? Because pretending to care can make you rich. Look at food labels, are you surprised that people are gaining more weight year after year? The FDA does nothing about the amount of fat, sugar, and calories in commonly consumed food and beverages, but they go after vaping companies and approve your drug. Why isn’t Lilly lobbying for reform? Because you don’t really care about anything other than money. More to the point, your drug will not put even the slightest dent in the obesity numbers. Why? Because obese people don't give a fuck. If I had obesity-related illnesses, it would be easier for me to take 6 to 15 drugs without many side effects than it would be to take your weight loss drug where I would feel sick to my stomach. As you just witnessed, everything can be situated perfectly for something to happen, but it doesn't because you have to rely on other people to perform. If four more free throws were made, the over 71.5 hits. What the fuck do I care? Hopefully, you lost money. I didn’t.

It's hypocrisy that bothers me. You are the easiest target because you are a bunch of hypocrites just like the people in our government.
 






anonymous said:
Why do you care about obesity-related illnesses? Because pretending to care can make you rich. Look at food labels, are you surprised that people are gaining more weight year after year? The FDA does nothing about the amount of fat, sugar, and calories in commonly consumed food and beverages, but they go after vaping companies and approve your drug. Why isn’t Lilly lobbying for reform? Because you don’t really care about anything other than money. More to the point, your drug will not put even the slightest dent in the obesity numbers. Why? Because obese people don't give a fuck. If I had obesity-related illnesses, it would be easier for me to take 6 to 15 drugs without many side effects than it would be to take your weight loss drug where I would feel sick to my stomach. As you just witnessed, everything can be situated perfectly for something to happen, but it doesn't because you have to rely on other people to perform. If four more free throws were made, the over 71.5 hits. What the fuck do I care? Hopefully, you lost money. I didn’t.

It's hypocrisy that bothers me. You are the easiest target because you are a bunch of hypocrites just like the people in our government.
Click to expand...

Dude, you need to learn to relax a bit. I don’t work for Lilly nor am I fat.
I did, however buy a few shares of Lilly stock last year which doesn’t amount to much.
You can’t possibly think the government can regulate or ban junk food.
Government tried prohibition with alcohol and you see how that went.
Most obese people aren’t lazy shits who don’t care.
Nothing wrong with having a med like Zepbound out there to aid people to a healthier life
As an adjunct to exercise and diet.
 






anonymous said:
Why not drastically increase the amount of exercise while decreasing the amount of food you eat per day if you're serious about losing weight? Why is zepbound better than doing those things?
Click to expand...

The fact you would even present that question confirms you are an ignorant troll who knows nothing about the complex multifactorial disease state of obesity.
I would suggest you educate yourself on metabolic adaptation, hormone regulation & other conditions that can disrupt the chemical homeostasis that largely determines an individuals ability to control his/her body weight, but I’m afraid you’re more interested in making childish, schoolyard jokes than actually understanding the nature & inherent challenges of treating & defeating obesity.
 






anonymous said:
The fact you would even present that question confirms you are an ignorant troll who knows nothing about the complex multifactorial disease state of obesity.
I would suggest you educate yourself on metabolic adaptation, hormone regulation & other conditions that can disrupt the chemical homeostasis that largely determines an individuals ability to control his/her body weight, but I’m afraid you’re more interested in making childish, schoolyard jokes than actually understanding the nature & inherent challenges of treating & defeating obesity.
Click to expand...

You're speaking about what percentage of the obese population? Maybe 5% max. What is childish is approving a weight loss drug while allowing a 591ml "sports drink" to contain
 






anonymous said:
You're speaking about what percentage of the obese population? Maybe 5% max. What is childish is approving a weight loss drug while allowing a 591ml "sports drink" to contain
Click to expand...

34g of added sugar. That's beyond childish. Just because you possess a photographic memory does not mean you have common sense or are an ethical physician.
 






The fact that over 40% of the U.S. population is considered obese proves that you don't know how to treat or defeat obesity. What is possibly more scary is the fact that a large number of young adults are technically obese but represented as being overweight. Those that are overweight, which is a risk factor for becoming obese, are represented as having a "normal" bmi.
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote