“I’ll kill them. I’ll kill his friends, I’ll kill his family..."







While the less-than-rational are chasing down examples of everything that's not relevant to the current climate of hate, here's a recent, real and viable threat to another lawmaker. This trust-fund baby was smart enough to leave his name and number on said threatening messages.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...ts-to-Rep.-Jim-McDermott-I-ll-kill-his-family

Since McDermott is a Dem, and since he was threatened for having voted FOR a Republican bill, the only possible conclusion is that the person making the threats is a whacked out Liberal.

You never were very good at putting two and two together, Set.
 












Since McDermott is a Dem, and since he was threatened for having voted FOR a Republican bill, the only possible conclusion is that the person making the threats is a whacked out Liberal.

You never were very good at putting two and two together, Set.

instead of mocking your obvious inability to comprehend a story when presented in full, I'll simply quote from it in the hopes that the small paragraph alone will help you grasp the story.

"Habermann took issue with McDermott’s characterization of the issues in the tax debate. He said Democratic members of Congress were “stealing” money from “the wealthy” and giving it away to “losers.” He said McDermott would never get away with it."
 






instead of mocking your obvious inability to comprehend a story when presented in full, I'll simply quote from it in the hopes that the small paragraph alone will help you grasp the story.

"Habermann took issue with McDermott’s characterization of the issues in the tax debate. He said Democratic members of Congress were “stealing” money from “the wealthy” and giving it away to “losers.” He said McDermott would never get away with it."

Don't even bother, in case you haven't noticed, he is in the middle of a massive online breakdown.
 






instead of mocking your obvious inability to comprehend a story when presented in full, I'll simply quote from it in the hopes that the small paragraph alone will help you grasp the story.

"Habermann took issue with McDermott’s characterization of the issues in the tax debate. He said Democratic members of Congress were “stealing” money from “the wealthy” and giving it away to “losers.” He said McDermott would never get away with it."

Well, you got it partly right. Where the argument falls is that McDermott voted FOR the Bush tax cuts. The threatener was an extreme leftist who didn't want the tax cut bill to pass.

Next.
 






instead of mocking your obvious inability to comprehend a story when presented in full, I'll simply quote from it in the hopes that the small paragraph alone will help you grasp the story.

"Habermann took issue with McDermott’s characterization of the issues in the tax debate. He said Democratic members of Congress were “stealing” money from “the wealthy” and giving it away to “losers.” He said McDermott would never get away with it."

Most of us are ignoring his posts. I feel bad enough contributing to his meltdown, I just can't send him reeling.
 






I HAVE LOOKED EVERYWHERE. I'VE ASKED EVERYONE I'VE SEEN, BUT...

NOBODY HAS ONE IOTA OF OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE CONNECTING THE CONSERVATIVES, REPUBLICANS, TEA PARTY SPLINTER GROUP MEMBERS OR ANYBODY ELSE WITH THE LOUGHNER ATTROCITY DESPITE THEIR VOCIFEROUS PROTESTATIONS TO THE CONTRARY. DENIAL OF THESE FACTS ARE INDICATIVE OF THE MORAL BANKRUPTCY OF THE POLITICAL LEFT IN THE UNITED STATES.

I THINK THIS MUST BE SCORED AS AT LEAST A 100 POINT BEAT DOWN. NOW LIE DOWN AND TAKE IT LIKE THE SWINE YOU ARE.

PLEASE LINE UP AND TAKE A NUMBER TICKET:

TAKE A RED TICKET IF YOU INTEND TO WHINE AND CRY.

TAKE A DARK RED TICKET IF YOU'RE GOING TO TRY TO PRETEND YOU DIDN'T JUST GET YOUR ASSES KICKED.

TAKE A BLUE TICKET IF YOU ARE HONEST AND WISH TO CONFESS THAT YOU ARE A SLIMEBAG WHO TELLS INTENTIONALLY INFLAMATORY LIES IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE AND MANIPULATE UNEDUCATED YOUNG VOTERS.


OOPS...WE SEEM TO HAVE RUN OUT OF BLUE TIKETS. THEY ALL SEEM TO TAKE THOSE. SORRY.

DICKHEADS TO THE LEFT..MORONS TO THE FAR LEFT. NO HORSEPLAY IN LINE, PLEASE.
 






Well, you got it partly right. Where the argument falls is that McDermott voted FOR the Bush tax cuts. The threatener was an extreme leftist who didn't want the tax cut bill to pass.

Next.

lol you have really gone off the deep end or you are engaging in a deliberate campaign of lying about everything.
 












I suggest you do what I did. Don't just rely on the one article, but research the incident further from several other sources. It might also help if you knew a little about McDermott's history.

um, no you didn't. McDermott was against the tax cuts, adamantly. He railed against them.
 
Last edited:
























Yes he did. Right up to the last second. But then when push came to shove he voted for Obama's position because he is, after all, a Democrat.

So you really didn't read the story, or research different sources. The terrorist clearly stated that he wanted to kill McDermott, his family, and friends because of his stance on the tax cuts. Again, you are either willfully ignoring the substance of the matter, or you're extremely ignorant. I'm going with the former, as the lot of you have proven to be abject liars when it comes to dealing with truth and facts.
 






So you really didn't read the story, or research different sources. The terrorist clearly stated that he wanted to kill McDermott, his family, and friends because of his stance on the tax cuts. Again, you are either willfully ignoring the substance of the matter, or you're extremely ignorant. I'm going with the former, as the lot of you have proven to be abject liars when it comes to dealing with truth and facts.

Sadly for you, it's you that has proven to be the abject liar when it comes to dealing with truth and facts. The truth hurts........liberals, such as yourself!
 






instead of mocking your obvious inability to comprehend a story when presented in full, I'll simply quote from it in the hopes that the small paragraph alone will help you grasp the story.

"Habermann took issue with McDermott’s characterization of the issues in the tax debate. He said Democratic members of Congress were “stealing” money from “the wealthy” and giving it away to “losers.” He said McDermott would never get away with it."

That's a pretty weak hand to go all in on. You lose.

Some people want to pretend that McDermott voted against extension of the Bush Tax Cuts, because it supports their theory that McDermott was shot at by a Tea Party member.

Here is the record of how McDermott voted on the issue:

http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/house/2/604

Think about it. Tea Partiers want lower taxes, and McDermott voted for tax cuts. Why would the Tea Party be against him? How he spoke prior to the vote is immaterial. What counts is how he voted.

The assassin was purely and simply nuts. Just like the Losercrats on this board.
 






That's a pretty weak hand to go all in on. You lose.

Some people want to pretend that McDermott voted against extension of the Bush Tax Cuts, because it supports their theory that McDermott was shot at by a Tea Party member.

Here is the record of how McDermott voted on the issue:

http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/house/2/604

Think about it. Tea Partiers want lower taxes, and McDermott voted for tax cuts. Why would the Tea Party be against him? How he spoke prior to the vote is immaterial. What counts is how he voted.

The assassin was purely and simply nuts. Just like the Losercrats on this board.

you have pretty much proven to me that you are another one of the indoctrinated. Ignoring facts and posting nonsensical rants day and night in caps and color is the status quo for right-wingers who simply want to dumb-down the discussion, which you do very effectively.
 






While the less-than-rational are chasing down examples of everything that's not relevant to the current climate of hate, here's a recent, real and viable threat to another lawmaker. This trust-fund baby was smart enough to leave his name and number on said threatening messages.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...ts-to-Rep.-Jim-McDermott-I-ll-kill-his-family

Can you imagine if McDermott had been a republican and this happened to him? ILA and sbelle's fingers would be bloody from posting about it non-stop. Instead, since he is a Dem, the cons have no use for this story since it doesn't support their myopic views.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...eath-threats-against-seattle-congressman.html
 






you have pretty much proven to me that you are another one of the indoctrinated. Ignoring facts and posting nonsensical rants day and night in caps and color is the status quo for right-wingers who simply want to dumb-down the discussion, which you do very effectively.

How did McDermot vote on the issue? He voted for the extension. What was in the mind of the shooter? We don't know.

One side, that which helps the Democrats, is illogical.

The other side, that which supports the contention that the shooter didn't even understand what was going on, is probably more truthful but liberidiots like Pail/Vag (same person), BN, RAB, Set, can't accept it because it goes against what they would like the truth to be.