Performance review result

anonymous

Guest
Two or three managers report to a senior manager. Do these managers know the scores that the other managers give to their team members?
What is the scope of the bell curve? Does it apply to the entire senior manager team or just to the group of managers?
 






Two or three managers report to a senior manager. Do these managers know the scores that the other managers give to their team members?
What is the scope of the bell curve? Does it apply to the entire senior manager team or just to the group of managers?
Why dont you just ask your director or VP? Why would you be afraid to ask such a simple question? I will tell you - They should do calibration meetings, where all the managers review, fight about and then finalize all the ratings across the department. That way they can forced rank the team into the different buckets. I know, the company swears that it does not force rank. But it does. Wow, you say, J&J leadership are being dishonest about something as important as peoples careers?!?!? Yep.
 












Two or three managers report to a senior manager. Do these managers know the scores that the other managers give to their team members?
What is the scope of the bell curve? Does it apply to the entire senior manager team or just to the group of managers?
Generally speaking, no the others Ms do not have visibility. But they should.
 












My current role has given me visibility into calibration for a larger (more than 10) team. The above poster is right about ‘balancing’ the reviews. We had to identify folks who could fall into Marginal to coincide with our Exceptional. It wasn’t 1:1 (it was in favor of Exceptional) but surprising that we were forced to ID people for lesser performance reviews.