Matrix vs. Spark

Quote






Spark isn't that good.
1) A full week after to see attainment. Matrix typically was a day or two delayed
2) Access data is wrong. Very wrong. Both for Med D and commercial
3) Can't see how you are measuring up vs. other territories, district and nation.
4) No way to graph out over a longer period of time. All you see is a 13W volume snapshot
5) The deep dive tab is difficult to read especially when you add columns.

I know you asked for one of two but there were too many negatives. I'm sure there are more but these are off the cuff.
 






I'm with you. Spark is a half empty glass of water. Why no listing of the actual trialists/adopters?
Try to do a sort of access plans to see who are the top writers in the plan. Oh wait, you can't.
Someone sold AZ a lemon. Those CBD's, DSM's and PSS's who were part of this roll out should be ashamed.
 






Spark data is par for the course at AZ. “What can we do to further complicate things for those that look at data?” Hey let’s roll out a platform that makes looking at the most simple elements of data, seem difficult and cumbersome. I want to see what my numbers are, my writers and my account data and which customers are writing my competition. Matrix did that and you could look at it all in about 3 minutes. Spark is trash.
 






Some giant plan somewhere will make a decision that the company has nothing to do with and people will end up going on trips.

The more these plans consolidate, the more laughable this becomes.
 












Top Bottom
Back
Quote