Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Re: Sally Sussman/Pfizer Lobbyists subject of congressal investigation of Obamacare d
Can't take another four years of this insanity
Can't take another four years of this insanity
Then she should go work for Obama and leave Pfizer. This company needs to clean up it's act and get back to it's founding principles.
Sussman did nothing to break the law.
She did her job and she did it well. Kindler, according to my sources, was the one who was in on back door deals and very heavily involved with the Democratic Party.
If anyone is the blame it's the Pres. for partaking in the backdoor deals and leaving Congress out of it. ObamaCare would have never passed Congress if they had known about all the different backdoor, sweetheart deals to healthcare industry. Obama, according to Congressmen, also alledgedly bribed some members of Congress with PORK that would benefit their states.
ObamaCare is not a good deal for America but obviously neither is Capitalistic Healthcare because of the excessive greed in every corner which has driven costs out of sight.
You're pathetic; your self-righteous demeanor impresses no one!
What?? I agree with the comment, AND fact is if Obama is reelected it would surprise no one if like her daddy she got a job from the administration for all her fundraising...Obama and politics is her first priority, Pfizer is just a way to line her pockets with some spending money...Susman is the poster child for what is wrong with this company...
Like I said, you're pathetic; your self-righteous demeanor impresses no one! Sally is a great person and has brought many benefits to Pfizer Inc. You're just jealous of her success!
Like I said, you're pathetic; your self-righteous demeanor impresses no one! Sally is a great person and has brought many benefits to Pfizer Inc. You're just jealous of her success!
Like I said, you're pathetic; your self-righteous demeanor impresses no one! Sally is a great person and has brought many benefits to Pfizer Inc. You're just jealous of her success!
I am not at all jealous of people who use other people's money to buy and spotlight politicians, in return for their own agendas. This is my opinion. I also believe that anybody affiliated in an Industry who "lobbys" for public policy, needs to be registered as a "lobbyist". An unregistered "lobbyist" who "lobbys" is like a Dr. who practices medicine without a lisence; or a person who drives a car without a registration.
Personally, I would rather be self-righteous; than self-serving.
I think her biggest mistake was getting her name plastered all over the Media for being an Obama Campaign Bundler.
I don't have so much of a prob with back door deals regarding policy that can benefit the company and industry. She was doing her job. If anybody is to fault it is the White House who alledgedly, decided to keep these deals hidden from Congress.
The extra monies to the O campaign, and organizing a very high profile campaign dinner as a bundler, under the Pfizer name,(Sally Sussman of Pfizer) seemed self serving. One could argue it was done on her personal time, but having the Public Position of being "Pfizer's Face, PAC handler and Poster Woman"...not so cool. But that's my opinion.
I think her biggest mistake was getting her name plastered all over the Media for being an Obama Campaign Bundler.
I don't have so much of a prob with back door deals regarding policy that can benefit the company and industry. She was doing her job. If anybody is to fault it is the White House who alledgedly, decided to keep these deals hidden from Congress.
The extra monies to the O campaign, and organizing a very high profile campaign dinner as a bundler, under the Pfizer name,(Sally Sussman of Pfizer) seemed self serving. One could argue it was done on her personal time, but having the Public Position of being "Pfizer's Face, PAC handler and Poster Woman"...not so cool. But that's my opinion.
The question is -- when Sally guides Pfizer's policy efforts, is she doing what's best for Obama and the Democrats or is she doing what's best for Pfizer? It's hard to believe that Obama's interests and Pfizer's are aligned. This sort of conflict of interest is really quite damaging to her reputation.
I think the rumours of her departing within the month must be true. How else can one explain her recent, overt, very high profile political activities in any other way than she just does not care how bad it makes Pfizer look. Perhaps this is her way of say F U Pfizer on her way out. Because of her, Jeff, and Sandy Beatty, the Republicans (our traditional allies and protectors) are now out to get us more than even the Democrats are. Nothing good will come from this.
The question is -- when Sally guides Pfizer's policy efforts, is she doing what's best for Obama and the Democrats or is she doing what's best for Pfizer? It's hard to believe that Obama's interests and Pfizer's are aligned. This sort of conflict of interest is really quite damaging to her reputation.
Jeff K. is known as a big democrat, not a republican. Last I heard he is an advisor to the POTUS along with other CEO's.
I think the rumours of her departing within the month must be true. How else can one explain her recent, overt, very high profile political activities in any other way than she just does not care how bad it makes Pfizer look. Perhaps this is her way of say F U Pfizer on her way out. Because of her, Jeff, and Sandy Beatty, the Republicans (our traditional allies and protectors) are now out to get us more than even the Democrats are. Nothing good will come from this.