Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Re: Sally Sussman/Pfizer Lobbyists subject of congressal investigation of Obamacare d
Stick to the subject, people.
Stick to the subject, people.
I have learned of your company's leadership in the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the organization’s undue influence on state lawmaking. It is time you joined Pepsi, Coke and Kraft to publicly disclaim all association with ALEC.
Why would you want to cozy up behind closed doors with the Koch Brothers and Big Tobacco to financially underwrite an organization whose agenda is to rewrite state laws throughout the country in a venue where the American people have no vote and no voice?
Please sever all ties with ALEC and stop underwriting their agenda.
if Pfizer management put half as much effort into growing the business that they do trying to play politics and and being on the forefront of social progressiveness we might actually have a future...
I have learned of your company's leadership in the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the organization’s undue influence on state lawmaking. It is time you joined Pepsi, Coke and Kraft to publicly disclaim all association with ALEC.
Why would you want to cozy up behind closed doors with the Koch Brothers and Big Tobacco to financially underwrite an organization whose agenda is to rewrite state laws throughout the country in a venue where the American people have no vote and no voice?
Please sever all ties with ALEC and stop underwriting their agenda.
So true! I read somewhere that Pfizer spend over 120Million Dollars last year to influence politicians. No wonder why they are doing away with our pensions.
No Pension. No PAC. And this ALEC organization sounds pretty creepy. Any politician who is a member of that should be ousted. Huge conflict of interest.
"NO PENSION
"NO PAC"
I can see the Posters and the T-Shirts in my head right now!
Pfizer has plenty of Political Representation and always will. Regardless of employee PAC, they would Bundle, instigate campaign dinners and entertain legislaters through ALEC. When a company or industry has too many lobbyiests it can backfire and cause public dissent.
What the posters are proposing (and its most likely fantasy of their part) is that if Pfizer, gives back their PENSION, then they would feel more engaged and willingly give to the PAC. It's called Negotiation and Pfizer ELT, Pfizer legal does it all the time, why can't employees?
Pfizer had no reason to take away the Pension Plan for those grandfathered in. The company is vibrant, has plenty of money rakes in massive profits. There are other areas that can be cut and areas that can even be Sold off.
I'd rather have a nice, portable, well matched 401K.
Someone told my DM that they heard Sussman was leaving Pfizer. I guess she will be the fall guy for the Obamacare deal.