i'm looking at a job with CN but i hear various opinions about the quality of the leadership, particularly the VP of sales. Good leader? I'm concerned because i've heard it's a difficult place for women. Can someone give me the straight story?
Ask yourself why would you consider this company when a) Continuous back order b) Due to limited devices, one cannot open a new account, unless approved c) Company not selling trademark devices - instructing all AED's to convert to lower ECAT device d) Companies comp plans only favorable for select few e) Pay on pt starts yet entire company still on backorder -figure that 1 out f) To many reputable reps have left since January due to BS g) Lets just say management prefers having female reps around H) VP is nothing but a YES BOY and he can't even do that right Hope this helps but is the straight up truth
I've been away from the madness for a while but the one thing I do remember is that the number of hot women there could be counted on one hand
And the others wouldn't classify as nightly images. Some of them have more bags than a stocked walmart
You got that straight! Looks like a French Fashion House; Givenchy, Chanel, Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Cardionet!
There are a handful of hot females that work here. I can think of a few. One in Florida and one in the MidAtlantic.
if two is a handful then you must have taken the same online math class as the people who got us into the backorder. All the hot ones have left in case you didn't take a good look around at the NSM.
did KN get a new computer or does he just have a lot of time on his hands? If I get one more rehashed email I may be forced to block him from my contacts
LifeWatch Services Facing FCA Charges on Use of Foreign Personnel Posted October 20, 2015, 3:14 P.M. ET By Eric Topor A federal district court in Illinois deniedcardiac monitoring company LifeWatch Services Inc.'s motion to dismiss a whistle-blower's lawsuit accusing the company of using uncertified technicians in India to perform monitoring services in violation of federal health-care regulations. False Claims Act whistle-blower Matthew Cieszynski, a technician with LifeWatch, alleged that his employer was using technicians in India to perform cardiac monitoring services to patients in the United States, and then switching the technician's name with a LifeWatch certified technician in the U.S. before submitting the claims for payment to Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the Veterans Administration Health Care. Cieszynski said LifeWatch knew that federal health-care program regulations require patients located in the U.S. to be treated by persons also located in the U.S., and that it falsely certified that it was in compliance with regulations with every claim submission. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said the whistle-blower's allegations, which included four specific claims submitted to Medicare that involved Indian technicians whose names were switched with U.S.-based technicians before submission to a referring physician, plausibly alleged that LifeWatch submitted false claims to the government. The court also pointed to forms LifeWatch allegedly submitted with each claim that certified compliance with federal health-care regulations as sufficient to establish liability under an express certification theory of liability.
LifeWatch Services Facing FCA Charges on Use of Foreign Personnel Posted October 20, 2015, 3:14 P.M. ET By Eric Topor A federal district court in Illinois deniedcardiac monitoring company LifeWatch Services Inc.'s motion to dismiss a whistle-blower's lawsuit accusing the company of using uncertified technicians in India to perform monitoring services in violation of federal health-care regulations. False Claims Act whistle-blower Matthew Cieszynski, a technician with LifeWatch, alleged that his employer was using technicians in India to perform cardiac monitoring services to patients in the United States, and then switching the technician's name with a LifeWatch certified technician in the U.S. before submitting the claims for payment to Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the Veterans Administration Health Care. Cieszynski said LifeWatch knew that federal health-care program regulations require patients located in the U.S. to be treated by persons also located in the U.S., and that it falsely certified that it was in compliance with regulations with every claim submission. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said the whistle-blower's allegations, which included four specific claims submitted to Medicare that involved Indian technicians whose names were switched with U.S.-based technicians before submission to a referring physician, plausibly alleged that LifeWatch submitted false claims to the government. The court also pointed to forms LifeWatch allegedly submitted with each claim that certified compliance with federal health-care regulations as sufficient to establish liability under an express certification theory of liability.