Pfizer sales rep murder vs concealed carry permit

Who cares how easy they are to get? Bad people will find their weapon of choice regardless of the barriers installed by the gun haters.

So you can shoot at a distance? You can bomb at a distance and kill multiple people at a time. You can spear at a distance. You can shoot an arrow at a distance. You can throw a knife at a distance. You can poison someone or multiple people without their knowledge, then watch from a distance. I could go on and on....at least a gun might give the innocent a fighting chance in many scenarios vs. having nothing or a knife or spear or sword only for defense of life.

Your point makes no real point. Life is precious for those who care to protect and defend themselves. How dare you make it difficult for them to do this! You can be a victim don't force it upon the rest of us. This is why we needed a second amendment, due to the many fools among us who prefer to be sheep led to their slaughter. Our forefathers knew this quite well. Human nature has not changed, nor should the clear words of the 2A.

 

The only gun control I support is the proper shooting stance and hand position.

 

Right in your EYE ya MOE troll Bc boy Pfghhhag

 

I wanted a Howitzer and I could not get it. I wanted a fuel-air bomb and I could not get it. I wanted a small neutron bomb and I could not get it. Why?

 

Because you could not afford them or you are not Muslim or Russian or a commie rebel from a 3rd world country.

Good thing we can't get those bombs to fight them back with, huh? We are so much better off being defenseless weaklings in their eyes, huh?

 

I carried all the many years before my retirement. Not only were my DMs aware of this, but as a Certified Firearms Instructor, I offered professional advice on their personal choice when defending self and family. There were many times when it was unavoidable to be in the less desirable parts of my territory with the DM riding along. When we were clearly cased just after opening the trunk by a group of three undesirables, my DM asked if I was carrying. I replied yes and asked him if he wanted me to defend him if we were attacked. The gangbangers were wise to move on when I placed myself between them and my boss. Needless to say, nothing ever appeared in my personnel file.

 

This is America - ONE NATION UNDER GUN. We don't care how many little kids get shot in the face. We don't care how many gun massacres there are. We don't care how many college kids are gunned down. We worship guns, not God. That's the way it is. If you don't like it, move to some country that cares about people coz you're not fitting in here!!!!

 

Damn right. As the famous quote from the 1960's goes: "Violence is as American as apple pie".

 

Idiots kill people, guns are inanimate objects. It is more an issue of mental health and the role of family, friends. You tools fail to look at the number of innocent lives saved by guns, because the media doesn't print the good news- only the Media Matters fed agenda news.
You stay unarmed, I'll stay protected- we shall see who lasts longer in todays world where this administration bolsters class envy and racial divide and self entitlement.

 

Extremely well said.

Not only do these gun haters bathe in victimhood, they want to drown all of us in it.

 

Old pharma industry urban legend. I call BS.

 

Bad analogy because we put a shit ton of restrictions on cars: driver tests, emission controls, seat-belts, etc. We put NO sensible restrictions on guns. We shouldn't ban guns but do what they do in Australia. You don't need to ban guns to make a real difference in getting rid of gun deaths. Use Wiki if you need to.

 

Holy shit you are a nut-toh.

1. It's freaking hard as shit to kill with a spear or knife. It's pretty easy to kill with a gun.
2. We make restrictions on bombs so we only get 2-3 bomb deaths per year. we make no restrictions on guns and we get THOUSANDS of deaths every year.
3. Life is precious and it's a freaking shame that innovent people are gunned down because people have guns.
4. A six year old just shoy his 3 yr old sister dead with his dads gun. Do you think the answer should be arming the 3 year old in order to stop this madness?

Your arguments are cut and pasted from some weird NRA website. What's next. The founding fathers owned oozi guns so we should too?

 

Have you ever even read the Constitution. Not what your friend tells you, but actually opened it up and seriously read the 2A???

If you are not in a Militia of the State you CANNOT possess a firearm. How the Supreme Court think this means EVERYONE is the wildest pie-in-the-eye reading of something so clearly written. Even Alito and Scalia have said that the C doesn't allow ownership but the matter is ruled on and settled. Own then now while you can because America will inevitable be Democrat in the future.

 

Wrong dumbass. Quit lying about the law. Just because you are delusional about what the 2A doesn't make it so. You are the exact reason we havevthe 2A. To protect ourselves from crazy lying bastards like you.

 

Wow, my point went right over your head. You just don't get it.

Even with all of your "lovely" restrictions you so worship on cars, tens of thousands of innocent people, children and pets included, die every year as a direct result of contact by that speeding 3000 lb missile.

But instead you scream like little bitches about gun ownership. There are plenty of criminal laws out there "restricting" the misconduct with a gun, but you won't be happy until we are all disarmed victims. Your insane anger is misplaced. How about properly enforcing the criminal laws on the books by putting nuts in institutions or criminals in jail longer to protect us from them? Stop with your suicidal revolving doors of putting predators back on the streets.

Lol about the fools in Australia. They're victim rate flew through the roof after they banned guns. Now they are re-arming themselves.

 

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compareyears/10/total_number_of_gun_deaths
Gun deaths have fallen by over a 3rd. Do you know the word "google"?

 

No, I got your analogy; it's just that's a piss-poor one. Let me make it clear then.

Cars - have restrictions placed on them.
Cars - without restrictions would be a factor of 100 the amount of car deaths each year but with restrictions they are less by 100x factor.

Guns - have NO restrictions placed on them
Guuns - we don't know what factor the the death rate would plummet if we DID have restrictions placed on them. In Australia it seems to be a factor of 3 that gun deaths fell with 1 decade. Yay Australia!

You are trying to equilibrate an object with restrictions (i.e., cars) with an object with no restrictions (i.e., guns) and this means you have poor logic skills. Let me help you out, you should compare another object with NO restrictions on it to guns. I hope you don't vote.

 

You should look at statistics.


USA = 2013 = 10 gun deaths per 100000 people

 

USA (2013)
10 deaths per 100,000 people = Guns
1 death per 1,000,000 people = Cars

This means CARS are safer than guns by a factor of 10.

Oh, and Australia which has Guns + Gun Laws has
1 death per 100,000 people.

Australia hasn't banned guns, all they did was make you register it and if you don't register you get in trouble. Guess what that means. Criminals don't register guns and get arrested. Hunters who do register guns get to use their guns hunting. So normal people get to use guns but criminals don't. Seems awesome to me, unless you are pro-criminal. Is that why you want no restrictions? Are you pro-criminal? Help me out.