60 Minutes

Michael, you stupid teabagger: what about "well regulated militia"? You are a twat.

 

Great... You regulate the militia.
Now, moron, what does this mean... "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”?

 

Michael, it's a sentence...read it carefully, no Cliff Notes for AHoles!

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It doesn't mean that every imbecile in the land needs to be armed like a Ninja!!

 

CP: Show some integrity and take DOWN this worthless thread!! It has nothing to do with Novartis!! It is dominated by morons!

 

Ok... So we now know what you think The Second Amendment does NOT mean, but what do you think it DOES MEAN?

This is gonna be GREAT!!!

 

i am not the moron you are responding to, but you do know what context means?

what may have made great sense in a bygone era does not imply it carries the same sense and applicability in today's era.

ignoring context for a minute, i would argue that it means anyone can keep and bear arms, including those who have a prior felony conviction.

instead of better understanding the meaning, let alone import, of the second amendment in an industrialized, western "civilized society", we should consider the following:

why are we #1 in the 1st world for mass shootings and other acts of gun violence?
why would we want to stay #1?

 

do you know why the # of page views is important to a website?

 

what agenda is not personal?

elaborate why disregarding the constitution constitutes someone as totalitarian?
or, is it only applicable when that someone is a "libtard"?
is it not totalitarian that the constitution grants the federal government a monopoly on violence, taxation power, and currency creation?

personally, i find the constitutional fetish a tad misplaced in a modern, late-stage capitalist, industrialized world.

are you also one of those types that believes moses was not high when he heard voices whispering from a burning bush?

 

HUH?????????????????????????????????????????????

 

Look, I get it, you aren't the first nor the last "living and breathing" Constitution moron.
A "living and breathing" Constitution is a DEAD CONSTITUTION.
And, with a Dead Constitution, it's a Free-for-all... The government has no guared-rails.
Say GoodBye to individual liberty and "RIGHTS".

 

Michael, you are a moronotwat.

 

MICHAEL I LOVE YOU!

 

You are a teabag moron.

 

I know neither Michael nor Loosie, but it is painfully obvious, Loosie is out of her league. Michael is eating her lunch everyday of the week and twice on Sundays.

 

" In a regulated militia" you boring twat.

 

So... "The people" only refers to the ones in a "militia"?
I wonder what you think the term "well regulated" means.

It is so interesting to hear how libtards think.

Apparently, The Constitution can mean whatever libtards want it to mean.

Got it!

 

Amen! To have our site polluted by tea baggers and libtards is too much! Get a life and start your own site!!

 

Get a life and don't visit this thread moron.

 

I wonder how libtards interpret "We the people".

Or this ONE...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of THE PEOPLE peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

They were probably just talking about THE PEOPLE in "the press".

Aw fuck it... The Constitution is outdated, let's just get rid of or ignore THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

But don't anyone touch The Constitutional RIGHT and CLEAR LANGUAGE that protects BABY KILLING.

 

It's simply a historically relevant statement referring to a civilian sponsored "militia" (State or Federal)...as opposed to a "royal" army of occupation. It's got nothing to do with imbecile yahoooos buying up assault weapons and high powered firearms to display their "manhood" HA!!!
I've no problem whatsoever with individuals owning weapons (to a reasonable and sane limit), but if you want to be an uneducated caricature of some sort of freedom fighter, join one of the armies in the Third World. Then you'll see what "personal freedom" feels like.