Why is PFE contributing to Planned Parenthood???

If a "religionist" can't stop a woman from having an abortion, how are they stopping a lady from going on birth control or buying a condom? Do you even think before you write something so stupid? I have a doubt that you're even a functioning adult.

And this isn't even so much about "right to reproductive freedom." I'm anti abortion but I'm not naive enough to believe abortion will ever be illegal. I don't even know exactly how I feel yet about tissues from murdered fetuses being used for research. However, I do know that it is complete wrong to take the tissues, organs, limbs, etc and sell them for a profit. If an adult cannot sell a kidney, why can Planned Parenthood (without the mother's knowledge) sell an organ for a profit. Any group or business that supports Planned Parenthood is flat out wrong and should call for an immediate change in leadership and procedures.

 

Yeah! Let's fire Pfizer!
Hold on... Wait a minute!

They are paying my bills, so... My bad. Let's get back to business as usual. I don't want to appear to have a bad attitude. Gods watching, but I have mouths to feed. He'll understand I'm sure. (??)

 

Guess you've forgotten how worthless George W Bush was on every issue. He was warned that Al Qaeda was planning a major terrorist strike in the USA and he ignored that warning. The result was over 3,000 Americans were killed on 9-11. He could have caught Osama Bin Laden in Tora Bora but failed. Remember how the trillion dollar war in Iraq produced zero weapons of mass destruction? Bush took us from a strong economy and a balanced budget to the worst economic collapse in 80 years. His No Child Left Behind legislation was completely ineffective. His budget-busting healthcare plan, Medicare Part C, will add $850 billion to the national debt in the next ten years. Bush took 1020 vacation days in his 8 years in office, which means he spend 35% of his time on vacation. Remember all this? Obama is a hero compared to the last Conservative in the White House. Oh you don't remember? What a surprise.

 

Do some research! Clinton had Bin Laden found and chose not to pursue when he was president and his organization was forming. Bush had been in the White House less than a year when terrorists attacked. He had the exact same warnings that Clinton had. Weapons of mass destruction were found..wait what? Yep. Learn to read. No Child Left Behind was Ted Kennedy's baby with bipartisan support. Once again some dumb ass only reads the headlines or what his party tells him instead of actually researching on his own. Congrats stud! Remember when Bush said pulling out of Iraq too soon would cause a larger and more aggressive terrorist group to form and take over the Middle East? Yep he said it and was quoted on it. But your boy Obama didn't listen to his warning and jumped out of Iraq (because he said he would) and didn't listen to any warnings. And look at what ISIS is now. Look at how radical islam is growing inside our own borders. That's your boy Obama. Open your eyes. Once again you're supporting the party of entitlement and handouts instead of personal accountability. You're part of the problem this country is facing right now.

 

This county is not relevant, and the more you understand that, the more you will live in peace. The action is in the Middle East, only.

At one time, we had it, but we gave it away about 100 years ago, and its over. With the abortions, and marriage rights, we are done. The Roman Empire is no longer.

But, no need to get caught up in it all, because the world will only get worse. Best way to live is to do it for yourself and your family, and let everyone walking in the wicked ways kiss your ass, because they will self destruct, while you enjoy your life.

 

Another Kool-Aid drinker believing State Run, Alphabet Channel, so-called journalism.

 

"Reproductive freedom?". Child, please STOP with the euphemisms.

Y'all are free to sex up whomever you want. We really don't care. But if you don't want to get pregnant, then please use contraception. If y'all DO mess around and get pregnant, then please don't be going inside 5 months later and ask someone cut that little human to pieces (later selling those pieces for profit). And then ask for the public to help pay for said cutting up.

 

This is a grotesque post, but it puts things in perspective. I too am tired of hearing the blabbing about how abortions reduce crime, and the claim that white right ringers care more about babies in wombs than for minorities in the inner cities.

I call B.S. on both of those obvious PP commercials. I am going to ask about starting a petition that no Pfizer money goes to Planned Parenthood. They've obviously overstepped their boundaries, here.

 

That's cool. 97% of scientists (aka people who know more about this than you) believe climate change is real and humans are having an impact. But you can believe whatever you want, just don't claim false equivalencies make your point legitimate. But you will continue to do so.

 

"97% of scientists believe"….more B.S. propaganda. Don't even get me started on THAT one, child. Your High Priest/Grand Poubah Al Gore made almost a billion dollars on that laughable presentation, and a litany scientists jumped all over it as means to raise grants, and to get published.

Stick to this point. Please justify going into a woman's body, delicately extracting the human that is in there, pulling out its organs, severing its limbs, and selling these parts. How about we do this, my PP acolyte: why don't we use a method vegans use: show graphic photos of butchering, or of animals being slaughtered. do you think if we did that in schools, the rate of abortions might go down? Gee, I wonder why?

 

I'll trust NASA and people actually knowledgeable in the field.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

 

The "abortions reduce crime" argument is one of the dumbest ideas floating around, along with "but, the child is going to have a tough life" argument.

We all have tough lives. People with money grow up to be jerks, despite the 3 meals, 2 snacks a day, and running water, and a roof over their head.

Abortion serves many purposes for the losers in our world:

1. It gives women a power they were never intended to have.
2. It emotionally damages a woman for life.
3. It supports to illegal transport of body parts.
4. It is a blood ritual for the evil (yes, this is real, you native dummies).

I could go on and on, but I won't. I am just happy to be single, and not have some women who has the power to destroy my child and my life for a little pleasure, around at all.

Women who have had an abortion need to check themselves before they pass. Judgement will be harsh for them. And the lawmakers and those that support this, are in for a very rough Judgement as well.

one last thing: FU PFIZER!

 

You know, abortion is bad, totally agree. But this is just plain crazy.

"4. It is a blood ritual for the evil (yes, this is real, you native dummies)."​

I mean, brainwashed, could be committed, type of crazy. Most Christians don't believe this, thankfully. No one in my church does.

 

You are a naive and foolish person, whose Christianity is worthless. Grow up and read your Bible, and know the truth. There are many verses about this:

Leviticus 20:2-5

"You shall also say to the sons of Israel: 'Any man from the sons of Israel or from the aliens sojourning in Israel who gives any of his offspring to Molech, shall surely be put to death; the people of the land shall stone him with stones. 'I will also set My face against that man and will cut him off from among his people, because he has given some of his offspring to Molech, so as to defile My sanctuary and to profane My holy name. "

Are not abortions an offering to Molech?

There are tons of more verses that support my position, but you follow a wrong Jesus (his name is not even Jesus, it is Yahshua, and hollowed be thy name).

Carry on with your ideas, and continue to call me crazy, as you and your powerless church continue to not search the Scriptures and live in your Fantasy Land.

You have a lot to learn, and please don't take this the wrong way. I have been in study for close to 20 years, and I have a lot to learn as well.

The difference between me and you and that I continue to learn and grow, while you just want to believe the "fun" parts of the Bible, and neglect learning more about the "God" (his name is Elohim, not God), as you should.

 

Uhhmmm. Doesn't NASA benefit financially from this horrific scourge known as the melting of the North polar ice cap. Sorry, too many independent sources out there refute the grant-getters' diatribes. BTW, how is Antartica's shrinking ice cap doing these days? What's this? It's not shrinking?

 

Don't fall for the mis-direction. Allow the abortionist justify the dismemberment of fetuses. And as another poster suggested, lets start linking photos of the results of an abortion. THEY (PP lovers are often global warming alarmists, no?) use faked pictures of lonely Arctic Circle predators, so why can't we use REAL photos of hacked humans?

 

BE CAREFUL! If you do anything to raise the ire of elected officials, you will pay the price. See what Obama's team (via the IRS) did to the Tea Party, or what the fat governor in New Jersey did to the mayor of that small town outside of the George Washington bridge?

 

Let's get something straight, Vick went to jail for inter-state gambling, not "dog fighting".

He is damn lucky he did not catch a RICO case out of it actually, and spend 20 to life in jail.

 

Hmmmm....let's apply Roe v. Wade and its successors which held that no abortion if the baby is viable. Back in the 60s, medical science was only advanced enough to keep a prematurely born baby alive around the beginning of the 3rd trimester. At that point, they deemed the baby is a human and abortion is murder. SCOTUS did give the woman and their abortionist doctor a way out by declaring that if birthing the baby after the 2nd trimester might harm the woman then they can still kill the unborn viable baby and it's not murder. This makes no sense to me. If the doctors could safely remove the baby early, then there is no need for killing it. But this was in the 1960s and maybe they weren't sophisticated enough to do so? I think they could, so the law makes no sense.

However, now with present medical science all babies from the time of conception are viable because they all can be transplanted to another woman. This means they are all viable as soon as it attaches to the woman's womb. So under current law, no woman shall have an abortion at any time, unless the transplant procedure shall harm her. Obviously, the right to abort a viable baby is insanely wrong and is truly murder.

The SCOTUS deemed that a viable baby has a right to life unless the birthing might kill the mother is antiquated because medical science has advanced drastically. Removing a baby from the time they are a zygote to full term is quite easy and safe. There are plenty of women who would volunteer or even get paid by private donors to carry the baby to full term.

All in all, under current law, all abortions are illegal. Logically applying the current decisions by the SCOTUS, all babies are viable, so all abortions are murder.

As for my personal feelings, I believe that a woman may only abort by the 3rd week or so. Whenever the first pregnancy test can tell a woman she is pregnant after the coitus. If we advance to having pregnancy tests that are accurate the day after coitus then the woman may abort that day only. This is just my opinion because I am not a "religionist", but a humanist.